Literature DB >> 3251239

Cholinergic antagonists in ventral tegmentum elevate thresholds for lateral hypothalamic and brainstem self-stimulation.

O Kofman1, J S Yeomans.   

Abstract

Frequency thresholds for lateral hypothalamic self-stimulation are elevated following microinjections of atropine into ventral tegmentum (73). Many self-stimulation sites in brainstem are situated near cholinergic cell groups and axons, and ventral tegmentum receives cholinergic afferents terminals. To test the hypothesis that ventral tegmental muscarinic receptors are involved in lateral hypothalamic and brainstem self-stimulation, stimulating electrodes were placed in lateral hypothalamus and dorsal tegmentum near the midbrain-pons border, and cannulae were implanted in ventral tegmentum. Microgram injections of muscarinic antagonists, atropine or scopolamine, or a choline uptake blocker, hemicholinium-3, elevated frequency thresholds for both self-stimulation sites in a dose-dependent and time-dependent fashion. In addition, summation and collision between the two self-stimulation sites was tested using paired-pulse methods (53). Summation ranged from 31 to 87% (i.e., 24 to 47% reductions in frequency threshold were observed at long intrapair intervals), but no collision-like effects were observed at short intrapair intervals. The ventral tegmentum is a likely site for the convergence of dorsal tegmental and lateral hypothalamic self-stimulation pathways.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3251239     DOI: 10.1016/0091-3057(88)90229-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav        ISSN: 0091-3057            Impact factor:   3.533


  9 in total

1.  Blockade of muscarinic acetylcholine receptors in the ventral tegmental area disrupts food-related learning in rats.

Authors:  Ruth Sharf; Robert Ranaldi
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2005-11-24       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Blockade of muscarinic acetylcholine receptors in the ventral tegmental area prevents acquisition of food-rewarded operant responding in rats.

Authors:  Ruth Sharf; Jennifer McKelvey; Robert Ranaldi
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2006-03-09       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 3.  Opioid-induced rewards, locomotion, and dopamine activation: A proposed model for control by mesopontine and rostromedial tegmental neurons.

Authors:  Stephan Steidl; David I Wasserman; Charles D Blaha; John S Yeomans
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2017-09-23       Impact factor: 8.989

Review 4.  Intracranial self-stimulation to evaluate abuse potential of drugs.

Authors:  S Stevens Negus; Laurence L Miller
Journal:  Pharmacol Rev       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 25.468

5.  Brain-stimulation reward thresholds raised by an antisense oligonucleotide for the M5 muscarinic receptor infused near dopamine cells.

Authors:  J S Yeomans; J Takeuchi; M Baptista; D D Flynn; K Lepik; J Nobrega; J Fulton; M R Ralph
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-12-01       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Mesencephalic substrate of reward: axonal connections.

Authors:  S M Boye; P P Rompré
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1996-05-15       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Acetylcholine release in the mesocorticolimbic dopamine system during cocaine seeking: conditioned and unconditioned contributions to reward and motivation.

Authors:  Zhi-Bing You; Bin Wang; Dawnya Zitzman; Roy A Wise
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-09-03       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Effects of pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus lesions on responding for intravenous heroin under different schedules of reinforcement.

Authors:  M C Olmstead; E M Munn; K B Franklin; R A Wise
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1998-07-01       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 9.  Neurobiology of reward-related learning.

Authors:  Ewa Galaj; Robert Ranaldi
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 8.989

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.