A national survey on radiation oncology patterns of practice in Switzerland during the COVID-19 pandemic: Present changes and future perspectives.

The outbreak of the novel coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) has rapidly and drastically impacted worldwide the healthcare system. Despite an increasing number of recommendations becoming available in the last two months, measures adopted in radiation-oncology departments to overcome this situation are rapidly changing and may differ largely based on institutional and national practices.

We conducted a national survey of all radiation oncology centers in Switzerland to better understand the early impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our discipline.

Methods

A 53-questions online survey was finalized on April 6th, 2020 using available recommendations [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8] and distributed by email on April 07th, 2020 to the representatives of the 30 Swiss radiation oncology departments. The survey was finalized on April 24th, 2020 with answers from 22 out of 30 Swiss radiation oncology departments (Suppl. Fig. 1).

Results

Up to April 7th, 2020, approximately half (45%, 10/22) of the Swiss radiation-oncology departments had been confronted with patients diagnosed with COVID-19, with 73% of the centers (16/22) experiencing a reduction of their daily activity (Suppl. Figs. 1 and 2). As far as human resources were concerned, 18% of the departments suffered from staff shortage (4/22), with COVID-19 infection among staff members observed in 5 out of 22 centers (23%,) and part/full-time shift of collaborators in a COVID-19 unit imposed in 6 out of 22 centers (27%).

Dedicated IT solutions for the COVID-19 crisis were implemented in all institutions. Remote access to the treatment planning workstations was available for staff members in 19 out of 22 centers (91%) and allowed for majority of the teams (17/22, 81%) to practice split staffing. In hospitals, the use of medical masks for all healthcare professionals was common practice in almost all centers (91%, 19/22).

For patient’s care, remote consultations were offered whenever possible in all centers. When a physical presence in the department was necessary, patients were screened at the hospital entrance in more than 70% of the centers (16/22). Moreover, patient zoning based on COVID-19 status was proposed in 19 centers (86.4%). Medical masks were mandatory for all patients in 59% of the centers (13/22), reserved for patients with symptoms in 36 % of the centers (8/22), while one center (5%) did not recommend any protective equipment.

For prostate cancer, radiotherapy treatment in the primary setting was delayed if not considered detrimental for low- and favorable intermediate-risk disease in almost all participating centers (90.9%, 20/22). The use of a neoadjuvant treatment up to an expected resolution of the peak of the pandemic was recommended by the 82% of the centers (18/22) if a concomitant androgen deprivation treatment (ADT) was indicated. For high-risk disease patients diagnosed during the pandemic, radiotherapy combined with ADT was the preferred treatment option recommended by the local tumorboards in 18/22 of the centers (82%). The proportion of centers using hypofractionated schedules for prostate cancer patients remained approximately the same, 86% (19/22) before and 91% (20/22) during pandemic. No shift towards an increased use of extreme hypofractionation was observed during the pandemic, with rates of centers using moderate or extreme hypofractionation, or both modalities, remaining stable over time (moderate: 50%, 11/22 vs. 55%, 12/22; extreme: 9%, 2/22 vs. 9%, 2/2; moderate + extreme: 27%, 6/22, vs. 27%, 6/22, before and during pandemic, respectively).

For breast cancer, during the COVID-19 pandemic half of the centers (11/22, 50%) omitted radiotherapy boost unless the patient presented with significant risk factors of relapse (≤60 years, high-grade tumors, inadequate margins). In 2 out of 22 centers (9%), radiotherapy was omitted for patients aged ≥65 years, with invasive breast cancer <30 mm, with clear margins, grade 1–2, estrogen receptors (ER)+, HER2−, and node negative disease, who were planned for treatment with endocrine therapy. Lastly, none of the centers omitted radiotherapy for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) breast cancer. The use of upfront endocrine therapy to delay radiotherapy initiation for breast cancer patients with ER+ cancer, either DCIS or invasive, was adopted by 50% of the centers. Compared to the pre-pandemic period, there was an 18% increase (from 64%, 14/22 to 82%, 18/22) in the rate of centers using moderate hypofractionation (i.e., 42.5 Gy/16 fx or 40 Gy/15 fx) for the majority of patients (all stages; intact breast and post-mastectomy and/or regional nodal irradiation) (Fig. 1 A). Extreme hypofractionated schedules (i.e., 26 Gy/5 fx daily or 28.5 Gy/5 fx once-weekly, as per the FAST and FAST Forward trials, respectively [9], [10] were adopted in one center (5%).

Fig. 1

Use of hypofractionation for breast (A) and rectal cancer (B) before and during COVID-19 pandemic.

Short course radiotherapy was the preferred neoadjuvant treatment for rectal cancer, with a 23% increase during the pandemic (from 41%, 9/22 to 64%, 14/22) (Fig. 1B). For other disease sites, with the exception of palliative radiotherapy for symptomatic bone metastases, no clear change of practice was observed (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2

Survey questions for non-prostate, non-breast disease sites. (RT, Radiotherapy).

Discussion

This survey provides a snapshot of the April 2020 status of the Swiss radiation oncology departments following the COVID-19 outbreak and highlights three major aspects.

First, confronted with the current pandemic, all radiation oncology departments were able to rapidly implement telemedicine. Second, all centers were able to reorganize institutional practices, with creation of zoning and use of dedicated protective equipment for patients and medical staff. Third, delay of radiotherapy treatments with hormonal manipulations when possible, associated with an increased use of hypofractionation for breast, rectal cancer and palliation were the pragmatic responses of the majority of the centers to the pandemic.

Our work faces the limitation associated with reporting the evolution of radiation oncology practices in the earliest stages of the pandemic, when ASTRO/ESTRO recommendations for lung and head and neck cancer [11], [12] were not yet published, with an unequal number of online resources available for participants depending on when they answered the survey (Suppl. Fig. 3). Moreover, a single country survey risks to be influenced by several aspects, including national-specific clinical practices, the healthcare reimbursement system, and the influence of governmental legislations undertaken during the pandemic. Nevertheless, valuable information is emerging from this report which may provide basis to better understand the actual and future impact of COVID-19 pandemic on our discipline.

Conflict of interest

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Funding

None