Literature DB >> 32511754

Effectiveness and safety of perampanel monotherapy for focal and generalized tonic-clonic seizures: Experience from a national multicenter registry.

Rafael Toledano Delgado1,2, Irene García-Morales2,3, Beatriz Parejo-Carbonell3, Adolfo Jiménez-Huete4, David Herrera-Ramirez2, Ayoze González-Hernández5, Fernando Ayuga Loro6, Estevo Santamarina7, Manuel Toledo7, Joaquín Ojeda8, Juan José Poza9, Albert Molins10, Pau Giner11, José Carlos Estévez María12, María Dolores Castro-Vilanova13, Jorge Zurita14, Rosa Ana Saiz-Diaz15, Asier Gómez-Ibañez16, Juan Rodriguez-Uranga17, Antonio Gil-Nagel2, Dulce Campos18, Álvaro Sánchez-Larsen19, Maria José Aguilar-Amat Prior20, José Angel Mauri Llerda21, Nuria Huertas González22, Nuria García-Barragán1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness and tolerability of perampanel (PER) monotherapy in routine clinical practice for the treatment of focal onset and generalized tonic-clonic seizures (GTCS).
METHODS: This multicenter, retrospective, observational study was conducted in patients aged ≥12 years treated with PER as primary monotherapy or converted to PER monotherapy by progressive reduction of background antiepileptic drugs. Outcomes included retention, responder, and seizure-free rate after 3, 6, and 12 months and tolerability throughout the follow-up.
RESULTS: A total of 98 patients (mean age = 49.6 ± 21.7 years, 51% female) with focal seizures and/or GTCS were treated with PER monotherapy for a median exposure of 14 months (range = 1-57) with a median dose of 4 mg (range = 2-10). The retention rates at 3, 6, and 12 months and last follow-up were 93.8%, 89.3%, 80.9%, and 71.4%, respectively. The retention rates according to the type of monotherapy (primary vs conversion) did not differ (log-rank P value = .57). Among the 98 patients, 61.2% patients had seizures throughout the baseline period, with a median seizure frequency of 0.6 seizures per month (range = 0.3-26). Responder rates at 3, 6, and 12 months were 79.6%, 70.1%, and 52.8%, respectively, and seizure freedom rates at the same points were 62.7%, 56.1%, and 41.5%. Regarding the 33 patients who had GTCS in the baseline period, 87.8% were seizure-free at 3 months, 78.1% at 6 months, and 55.1% at 12 months. Over the entire follow-up, PER monotherapy was generally well tolerated, and only 16% of patients discontinued PER due to adverse events (AEs). Female patients were found to be at a higher risk of psychiatric AEs (female vs male odds ratio = 2.85, 95% confidence interval = 1-8.33, P = .046). SIGNIFICANCE: PER demonstrated good effectiveness and a good safety profile when used as primary therapy or conversion to monotherapy at relatively low doses, in a clinical setting with patients with focal seizures and GTCS.
© 2020 International League Against Epilepsy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  effectiveness; epilepsy; monotherapy; perampanel; tolerability

Year:  2020        PMID: 32511754     DOI: 10.1111/epi.16548

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Epilepsia        ISSN: 0013-9580            Impact factor:   5.864


  6 in total

1.  Efficacy and adverse reactions of perampanel in the treatment of epilepsy in children.

Authors:  Dan Li; Shaoping Huang; Xueying Wang; Lin Yang; Tingting Song
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-07-27       Impact factor: 4.086

2.  Perampanel and childhood absence epilepsy: A real life experience.

Authors:  Francesca Felicia Operto; Alessandro Orsini; Gianpiero Sica; Chiara Scuoppo; Chiara Padovano; Valentina Vivenzio; Valeria de Simone; Rosetta Rinaldi; Gilda Belfiore; Roberta Mazza; Salvatore Aiello; Luigi Vetri; Serena Donadio; Angelo Labate; Grazia Maria Giovanna Pastorino
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-08-11       Impact factor: 4.086

3.  Replacement of Valproic Acid with New Anti-Seizure Medications in Idiopathic Generalized Epilepsy.

Authors:  Ayataka Fujimoto; Hideo Enoki; Keisuke Hatano; Keishiro Sato; Tohru Okanishi
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-08-05       Impact factor: 4.964

4.  Perampanel Reduces Hyperthermia-Induced Seizures in Dravet Syndrome Mouse Model.

Authors:  Shih-Yin Ho; Li Lin; I-Chun Chen; Che-Wen Tsai; Fang-Chia Chang; Horng-Huei Liou
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2021-07-14       Impact factor: 5.810

Review 5.  Optimal Use of Perampanel in Asian Patients with Epilepsy: Expert Opinion.

Authors:  Yotin Chinvarun; Chin-Wei Huang; Ye Wu; Hsiu-Fen Lee; Surachai Likasitwattanakul; Jing Ding; Takamichi Yamamoto
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2021-07-21       Impact factor: 2.423

6.  PERMIT study: a global pooled analysis study of the effectiveness and tolerability of perampanel in routine clinical practice.

Authors:  Vicente Villanueva; Wendyl D'Souza; Hiroko Goji; Dong Wook Kim; Claudio Liguori; Rob McMurray; Imad Najm; Estevo Santamarina; Bernhard J Steinhoff; Pavel Vlasov; Tony Wu; Eugen Trinka
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2021-08-24       Impact factor: 4.849

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.