Literature DB >> 32510784

How rates of perinatal mental health screening in Australia have changed over time and which women are missing out.

Katrina M Moss1, Nicole Reilly2,3, Annette J Dobson1, Deborah Loxton2, Leigh Tooth1, Gita D Mishra1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To report rates of perinatal mental health screening from 2000 to 2017 and investigate factors associated with not being screened both antenatally and postnatally more recently (2013-2017).
METHODS: A longitudinal community-based study of self-reported perinatal mental health screening with a national sample of 7,566 mothers from the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women's Health reporting on 9,384 children. The main outcome measure was whether mothers were asked about their emotional wellbeing by a health professional, including completing a questionnaire.
RESULTS: From 2000 to 2017, the percentage of women not screened decreased from 40.6% to 1.7%. The percentage of women screened both antenatally and postnatally increased from 21.3% to 79.3%. From 2013 to 2017, women who were older (aOR, 0.65; 95%CI, 0.52-0.81) or had reported emotional distress (aOR, 0.77; 95%CI, 0.60-0.99) were less likely to have been screened both antenatally and postnatally.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite improvements, perinatal mental health screening is not yet universal. One-in-five women are not screened both antenatally and postnatally, including women in high-risk populations such as those who have reported emotional distress. Implications for public health: Women are in regular contact with health professionals in the perinatal period. This opportunity to detect women at risk of perinatal mental health issues is too important to be missed.
© 2020 The Authors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Australia; longitudinal study; maternal depression; mental health; perinatal screening

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32510784     DOI: 10.1111/1753-6405.12999

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust N Z J Public Health        ISSN: 1326-0200            Impact factor:   2.939


  4 in total

1.  Perinatal Depression in Australian Women during the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Birth in the Time of COVID-19 (BITTOC) Study.

Authors:  Belinda Lequertier; Mia A McLean; Sue Kildea; Suzanne King; Hazel Keedle; Yu Gao; Jacqueline A Boyle; Kingsley Agho; Hannah G Dahlen
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-04-21       Impact factor: 4.614

2.  Generational differences in the prevalence of postpartum depression among young Australians: a comparison of two cohorts born 17 years apart.

Authors:  Sifan Cao; Mark Jones; Leigh Tooth; Gita Devi Mishra
Journal:  Arch Womens Ment Health       Date:  2021-09-15       Impact factor: 3.633

3.  Perceived social support on postpartum mental health:  An instrumental variable analysis.

Authors:  John Nkwoma Inekwe; Evelyn Lee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-05-05       Impact factor: 3.752

4.  Research Trends and Geographical Contribution in the Field of Perinatal Mental Health: A Bibliometric Analysis from 1900 to 2020.

Authors:  Usman Ali; Ahmed Waqas; Muhammad Ayub
Journal:  Womens Health Rep (New Rochelle)       Date:  2022-07-25
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.