Mariela L Lara-Cabrera1,2,3, Stål Bjørkly4,5, Carlos De Las Cuevas6, Sindre Andre Pedersen7, Ingunn Pernille Mundal4,8. 1. Division of Mental Health, Department of Research and Development, St Olav's University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway. 2. Department of Mental Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway. 3. Division of Psychiatry, Tiller Community Mental Health Centre, St. Olav's University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway. 4. Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, Molde University College, Molde, Norway. 5. Centre for Research and Education in Forensic Psychiatry, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway. 6. Department of Internal Medicine, Dermatology and Psychiatry, University of La Laguna, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain. 7. Faculty of medicine and health sciences, Library Section for Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway. 8. Kristiansund Community Mental Health Centre, Møre og Romsdal Health Trust, Møre og Romsdal, Norway.
Abstract
AIMS: To synthesize evidence of the psychometric properties of the Five-item World Health Organization Well-being Index in mental health settings and critically appraise the methodologies of the included studies. DESIGN: Protocol for a systematic psychometric review. METHODS: The review protocol has been registered in the International Prospective Register for Systematic Reviews. The bibliographic databases MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science will be searched for relevant studies. The psychometric properties of each study will be evaluated according to the Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurements Instruments. DISCUSSION: The results of our psychometric review will synthesize the psychometric properties of the Five-item World Health Organization Well-being Index in mental health settings and identify possible gaps in the literature regarding methodological quality and its reliability, validity, and responsiveness to change. IMPACT: The evaluation of patient well-being is important, and the Five-item World Health Organization Well-being Index is an increasingly used patient-reported outcome measure. It is simple to collect, free to use, and consists of five questions using positive health statements. Although the number of studies assessing the validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the questionnaire is increasing worldwide, there is a need to summarize the existing evidence of the psychometric properties of this questionnaire. The proposed study's findings will contribute to future research recommendations and help midwives and nurses in different settings pick an effective, appropriate questionnaire to evaluate patient well-being.
AIMS: To synthesize evidence of the psychometric properties of the Five-item World Health Organization Well-being Index in mental health settings and critically appraise the methodologies of the included studies. DESIGN: Protocol for a systematic psychometric review. METHODS: The review protocol has been registered in the International Prospective Register for Systematic Reviews. The bibliographic databases MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science will be searched for relevant studies. The psychometric properties of each study will be evaluated according to the Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurements Instruments. DISCUSSION: The results of our psychometric review will synthesize the psychometric properties of the Five-item World Health Organization Well-being Index in mental health settings and identify possible gaps in the literature regarding methodological quality and its reliability, validity, and responsiveness to change. IMPACT: The evaluation of patient well-being is important, and the Five-item World Health Organization Well-being Index is an increasingly used patient-reported outcome measure. It is simple to collect, free to use, and consists of five questions using positive health statements. Although the number of studies assessing the validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the questionnaire is increasing worldwide, there is a need to summarize the existing evidence of the psychometric properties of this questionnaire. The proposed study's findings will contribute to future research recommendations and help midwives and nurses in different settings pick an effective, appropriate questionnaire to evaluate patient well-being.
Authors: Roger S McIntyre; Zahinoor Ismail; Christopher P Watling; Catherine Weiss; Stine R Meehan; Primrose Musingarimi; Michael E Thase Journal: J Patient Rep Outcomes Date: 2022-06-10
Authors: Mariela Loreto Lara-Cabrera; Moisés Betancort; Amparo Muñoz-Rubilar; Natalia Rodríguez-Novo; Ottar Bjerkeset; Carlos De Las Cuevas Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-08-16 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: Alberto José Niituma Ogata; Ana Maria Malik; Viviane Lourenço; Valena Savia; Ana Claudia Pinto; Yohana Rodrigues Journal: Rev Bras Med Trab Date: 2022-03-30