Literature DB >> 32510556

MetaFS: Performance assessment of biomarker discovery in metaproteomics.

Jing Tang, Minjie Mou, Yunxia Wang, Yongchao Luo, Feng Zhu.   

Abstract

Metaproteomics suffers from the issues of dimensionality and sparsity. Data reduction methods can maximally identify the relevant subset of significant differential features and reduce data redundancy. Feature selection (FS) methods were applied to obtain the significant differential subset. So far, a variety of feature selection methods have been developed for metaproteomic study. However, due to FS's performance depended heavily on the data characteristics of a given research, the well-suitable feature selection method must be carefully selected to obtain the reproducible differential proteins. Moreover, it is critical to evaluate the performance of each FS method according to comprehensive criteria, because the single criterion is not sufficient to reflect the overall performance of the FS method. Therefore, we developed an online tool named MetaFS, which provided 13 types of FS methods and conducted the comprehensive evaluation on the complex FS methods using four widely accepted and independent criteria. Furthermore, the function and reliability of MetaFS were systematically tested and validated via two case studies. In sum, MetaFS could be a distinguished tool for discovering the overall well-performed FS method for selecting the potential biomarkers in microbiome studies. The online tool is freely available at https://idrblab.org/metafs/.
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Keywords:  biomarker discovery; consistency and robustness; feature selection method; metaproteomic; predictive performance

Year:  2021        PMID: 32510556     DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbaa105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brief Bioinform        ISSN: 1467-5463            Impact factor:   11.622


  6 in total

1.  Understanding the mutational frequency in SARS-CoV-2 proteome using structural features.

Authors:  Puneet Rawat; Divya Sharma; Medha Pandey; R Prabakaran; M Michael Gromiha
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2022-06-07       Impact factor: 6.698

2.  Diagnosis and prognosis of COVID-19 employing analysis of patients' plasma and serum via LC-MS and machine learning.

Authors:  Alexandre de Fátima Cobre; Monica Surek; Dile Pontarolo Stremel; Mariana Millan Fachi; Helena Hiemisch Lobo Borba; Fernanda Stumpf Tonin; Roberto Pontarolo
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2022-05-21       Impact factor: 6.698

3.  Integrated COVID-19 Predictor: Differential expression analysis to reveal potential biomarkers and prediction of coronavirus using RNA-Seq profile data.

Authors:  Naiyar Iqbal; Pradeep Kumar
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2022-06-03       Impact factor: 6.698

4.  A combined test for feature selection on sparse metaproteomics data-an alternative to missing value imputation.

Authors:  Sandra Plancade; Magali Berland; Mélisande Blein-Nicolas; Olivier Langella; Ariane Bassignani; Catherine Juste
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 3.061

Review 5.  Recent Advances in Predicting Protein S-Nitrosylation Sites.

Authors:  Qian Zhao; Jiaqi Ma; Fang Xie; Yu Wang; Yu Zhang; Hui Li; Yuan Sun; Liqi Wang; Mian Guo; Ke Han
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  GIMICA: host genetic and immune factors shaping human microbiota.

Authors:  Jing Tang; Xianglu Wu; Minjie Mou; Chuan Wang; Lidan Wang; Fengcheng Li; Maiyuan Guo; Jiayi Yin; Wenqin Xie; Xiaona Wang; Yingxiong Wang; Yubin Ding; Weiwei Xue; Feng Zhu
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 16.971

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.