Literature DB >> 3251000

Advantages of a standard method for research on reproductive effects of occupation.

M Joffe1.   

Abstract

A recent review of the literature identified several common methodological weaknesses in studies of the effects of occupational exposures on male and female reproductive processes. This paper suggests a strategy which addresses these problems, by the use of a standard method. The potential benefits include increased measurement reliability and statistical power, together with a systematic study of expected (background) rates, confounding effects, types of exposure and selection effects. Particular advantages are the avoidance of designating a group as non-exposed with attendant problems of bias, and in the longer term the study of multiple or rare exposures.

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3251000      PMCID: PMC1052727          DOI: 10.1136/jech.42.3.209

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health        ISSN: 0143-005X            Impact factor:   3.710


  21 in total

1.  Comparison of ante-natal hospital records with retrospective interviewing.

Authors:  M Joffe; J A Grisso
Journal:  J Biosoc Sci       Date:  1985-01

Review 2.  Assessment of methods and results of reproductive occupational epidemiology: spontaneous abortions and malformations in the offspring of working women.

Authors:  K Hemminki; O Axelson; M L Niemi; G Ahlborg
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 2.214

3.  [Attempt to correct the bias due to non-response].

Authors:  M Chavance
Journal:  Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 1.019

4.  Use of exposure data in occupational reproductive studies.

Authors:  G K Lemasters; S G Selevan
Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health       Date:  1984-02       Impact factor: 5.024

5.  Spontaneous abortions in an industrialized community in Finland.

Authors:  K Hemminki; P Kyyrönen; M L Niemi; K Koskinen; M Sallmén; H Vainio
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Exposure to anaesthetic gases and spontaneous abortion: response bias in a postal questionnaire study.

Authors:  G Axelsson; R Rylander
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 7.196

7.  A comparison of two respiratory symptoms questionnaires.

Authors:  W W Holland; J R Ashford; J R Colley; D C Morgan; N J Pearson
Journal:  Br J Prev Soc Med       Date:  1966-04

8.  Congenital defects and occupational factors. A comparison of different methodological approaches.

Authors:  P C Holmberg; S Hernberg
Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health       Date:  1979-12       Impact factor: 5.024

9.  Reciprocal effects of health and labor force participation among women: evidence from two longitudinal studies.

Authors:  I Waldron; J Herold; D Dunn; R Staum
Journal:  J Occup Med       Date:  1982-02

10.  Validation of questionnaire reported miscarriage, malformation and birth weight.

Authors:  G Axelsson; R Rylander
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 7.196

View more
  4 in total

1.  Detection of agents causing genetic or reproductive damage.

Authors:  M Joffe
Journal:  Br J Ind Med       Date:  1992-01

2.  Feasibility of studying subfertility using retrospective self reports.

Authors:  M Joffe
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 3.710

3.  Lead-exposed workmen and fertility: a cohort study on 354 subjects.

Authors:  J Coste; L Mandereau; F Pessione; M Bregu; C Faye; D Hemon; A Spira
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 8.082

4.  Use of questionnaires in a study of spontaneous abortion in a general population.

Authors:  G Axelsson
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 3.710

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.