| Literature DB >> 32509877 |
Kolapo Ayoola Fasina1,2, Titilayo O Adesetan2, Faithfulness Oseghale3, Haneefat O Egberongbe2, O O Aghughu1, Fred A Akpobome1.
Abstract
Ficus asperifolia Linn. known as "Eepin" in Yoruba language, or sand paper tree, is a monoecious fig tree whose leaves, bark, seeds, and roots have been used locally in treating many infectious and noninfectious diseases. The study is aimed at investigating the bacteriological and phytochemical potential of Ficus asperifolia Linn. The roots of the plant were harvested and washed, and phytochemical analysis was carried out using standard analytical techniques. Infusion was aseptically prepared, and incubation for 24 hours and microbiological analysis were carried out using the pour plate method on Plate Count Agar (PCA) and Nutrient Agar (NA). Microorganisms were subcultured and identified using morphological and biochemical tests according to "Bergey's Manual of Determinative Bacteriology." Phytochemical analysis of the fresh and dry roots revealed the presence of alkaloids, cardenolides, and saponins, while anthraquinones and tannins were absent. Total heterotrophic bacteria count on PCA was 5.6 × 105 CFU/ml, while on NA, it was 2.3 × 105 CFU/ml, and four classes of bacteria were isolated including Klebsiella sp., Escherichia coli, Proteus sp., and Bacillus sp. Although the presence of medicinal phytochemicals in F. asperifolia Linn. indicates strong potentials for its use in infusions, the presence of potential pathogens found in the infusions makes it unsafe for consumption.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32509877 PMCID: PMC7244965 DOI: 10.1155/2020/9762639
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Colonial morphology and biochemical tests of microbial isolates.
| Characteristics | PCA | NA | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N1 | N2 | N3 | N4 | |
| Shape | Circular | Irregular | Irregular | Circular |
| Elevation | Convex | Unbonate | Flat | Flat |
| Edge | Entire | Entire | Lobulated | Entire |
| Consistency | Moist | Dry | Moist | Dry |
| Opacity | Opaque | Opaque | Translucent | Opaque |
| Spread | None | None | Swarming | None |
| Pigmentation | Cream | White | Creamish white | Creamish white |
| Grams | -ve | -ve | -ve | +ve |
| Shape | Rod | Rod | Rod | Rod |
| Catalase | +ve | -ve | -ve | +ve |
| Citrate | +ve | -ve | -ve | +ve |
| Sucrose | +ve | +ve | +ve | +ve |
| Maltose | -ve | +ve | +ve | +ve |
| Fructose | +ve | +ve | +ve | +ve |
| Glucose | +ve | +ve | +ve | +ve |
| D(+) galactose | +ve | +ve | -ve | +ve |
| Lactose | -ve | +ve | -ve | +ve |
| Probable organism |
|
|
|
|
Phytochemical analysis of the fresh roots of Ficus asperifolia.
| Test | Observation | Inference |
|---|---|---|
| Alkaloid test | ||
| (i) Dragendoff's reagent | Brown precipitate formed | Alkaloids present |
| (ii) Meyer's reagent | No precipitate formed | Alkaloids absent |
| (iii) Wagner's reagent | Brown precipitate formed | Alkaloids present |
| Cardenolide test | ||
| (i) Keller-Killiani | Brown ring formed | Cardenolides present |
| (ii) Kedde | No brown ring | Cardenolides absent |
| Anthraquinone test | No mixture of chloroform and ammonia | Anthraquinones absent |
| Saponin test (frothing) | Soapy froth observed | Saponins present |
| Tannin test (ferric chloride) | No precipitate | Tannins absent |
Phytochemical analysis of the fresh roots of Ficus asperifolia Linn.
| Test | Observation | Inference |
|---|---|---|
| Alkaloid test | ||
| (i) Dragendoff's reagent | Brown precipitate formed | Alkaloids present |
| (ii) Meyer's reagent | No precipitate formed | Alkaloids absent |
| (iii) Wagner's reagent | Brown precipitate formed | Alkaloids present |
| Cardenolide test | ||
| (i) Keller-Killiani | Brown ring formed | Cardenolides present |
| (ii) Kedde | No brown ring | Cardenolides absent |
| Anthraquinone test | No mixture of chloroform and ammonia | Anthraquinones absent |
| Saponin test (frothing) | Soapy froth observed | Saponins present |
| Tannin test (ferric chloride) | No precipitate | Tannins absent |