| Literature DB >> 32509500 |
Xiaohong Wang1,2, Jin Cheng1, Wenjuan Qin1,3, Hua Chen1, Gongwei Chen1, Xuanjian Shang1, Mengting Zhang1, Nyamsuren Balsai1, Hongquan Chen1,4,3.
Abstract
Chinese and imported pig breeds differ in fat production potential, which is associated with the polymorphisms in the 5' proximal regulating region (5'PRR) of thyroid hormone responsive gene (THRSP). In three Chinese breeds (Dingyuan, CDY; Wannanhua, CWH; and Jixi, CJX) and one introduced breed (Yorkshire, YKS), three variant sites were located at T/C-400, A/G-376, and G/A-98 in the 5'PRR. Chinese pig breeds had higher C-400 allele frequencies than YKS. The frequencies of A-376 in CDY and G-376 in CWH were about 0.8. G-98 allele frequencies in CWH and YKS were 0.8617 and 0.8149, respectively. TGG was the dominant haplotype in YKS, CGG in CWH and CJX, and CAA in CDY. According to haplotype frequency, four breeds were clustered into three types, which was consistent with the geographical distribution of the breeds. In CDY, the average backfat thickness (BFT) was the highest with the CC-400 genotype, followed by CT-400 and TT-400 genotypes. In YKS, the pigs with CC-400 or CT-400 genotypes had higher BFT and average daily weight gain, whereas those with CC-400 or TT-400 genotypes had larger lion-eye area. No significant difference was observed in carcass traits among different genotypes at the A/G-376 and G/A-98 loci. The mRNA abundance of THRSP expression for the CCAGAG genotype was significantly higher than that for CTAGAG or TTAGAG genotype. These results indicated that the polymorphisms and genotype distribution of THRSP were closely related to the potential for fat production in pig breeds, which were the result of adaptation to artificial selection and natural selection. © King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology 2020.Entities:
Keywords: Backfat thickness; Carcass trait; Genotype distribution; Pig breed; THRSP gene
Year: 2020 PMID: 32509500 PMCID: PMC7248146 DOI: 10.1007/s13205-020-02266-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: 3 Biotech ISSN: 2190-5738 Impact factor: 2.406