| Literature DB >> 32508942 |
Bailu Duan1, Lintao Han2, Shuping Ming3,4, JingJing Li1, Qiong Wang1, Dongning Zhang2, Guangyu Tian1, Fang Huang1.
Abstract
The Fuling (Poria cocos)-Guizhi (Cinnamomi ramulus) herb pair (FGHP) is a commonly used traditional Chinese herbal formula with coronary heart disease (CHD) treatment potential. However, the mechanism of FGHP in the treatment of CHD was still unclear. In this study, the action targets and underlying mechanism of FGHP against CHD were successfully achieved by combined network pharmacology prediction with experimental verification. 76 common targets were screened out by overlapping the chemical-protein data of FGHP and CHD-related targets. Then, two key targets were further selected for verification by using western blot analysis after analyzing PPI, GO function, and KEGG pathway. Results indicated FGHP could alleviate CHD syndromes and regulate inflammatory responses in acute myocardial ischemia rats, and the reduction of expression of TNF-α and IL-6 in myocardial tissue would be one of its possible underlying mechanisms. Our work demonstrated that network pharmacology combined with experimental verification provides a credible method to elucidate the pharmacological mechanism of FGHP against CHD.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32508942 PMCID: PMC7251461 DOI: 10.1155/2020/1489036
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
A list of the active compounds in FGHP.
| No. | Compound | OB (%) | DL | Herb |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | (2R)-2-[(3S, 5R, 10S, 13R, 14R, 16R, 17R)-3,16-Dihydroxy-4,4,10,13,14-pentamethyl-2,3,5,6,12,15,16,17-octahydro-1H-cyclopenta[a]phenanthren-17-yl]-6-methylhept-5-enoic acid | 30.93 | 0.81 | FL |
| 2 | Trametenolic acid | 38.71 | 0.8 | FL |
| 3 | Cerevisterol | 37.96 | 0.77 | FL |
| 4 | Ergosterol peroxide | 40.36 | 0.81 | FL |
| 5 | 3 | 38.7 | 0.81 | FL |
| 6 | Pachymic acid | 33.63 | 0.81 | FL |
| 7 | Poricoic acid A | 30.61 | 0.76 | FL |
| 8 | Poricoic acid B | 30.52 | 0.75 | FL |
| 9 | Poricoic acid C | 38.15 | 0.75 | FL |
| 10 | Hederagenin | 36.91 | 0.75 | FL |
| 11 | Dehydroeburicoic acid | 44.17 | 0.83 | FL |
| 12 | (−)-Taxifolin | 60.51 | 0.27 | GZ |
| 13 |
| 36.91 | 0.75 | GZ |
| 14 | Sitosterol | 36.91 | 0.75 | GZ |
| 15 | (+)-Catechin | 54.83 | 0.24 | GZ |
| 16 | ent-Epicatechin | 48.96 | 0.24 | GZ |
| 17 | Taxifolin | 57.84 | 0.27 | GZ |
| 18 | Peroxyergosterol | 44.39 | 0.82 | GZ |
Figure 1Overlapping targets between FGHP (A) and CHD (B).
Figure 2GO (a) and pathway (b) enrichment analysis by DAVID.
Figure 3PPI network of targets for FGHP against CHD (a). Top 10 targets in PPI network (b).
Figure 4The component-target-pathway network. There is a positive proportional relationship between the node size and the edge count.
Figure 5Effects of FGHP on ECG in AMI rats. ECG recordings (a) and bar graph of ST segment (b). ++P < 0.01 vs. the control group; P < 0.05 vs. the ISO group. Values are presented as mean ± SEM.
Figure 6Effects of FGHP on CK-MB (a) and LDH (b) in AMI rats. ++P < 0.01 vs. the control group; P < 0.01 vs. the ISO group. Values are presented as mean ± SEM.
Figure 7Effects of FGHP on histopathological features in AMI rats. Representative H&E staining images of heart paraffin sections in the various groups. Original magnification ×200. (a) Control. (b) ISO. (c) ISO + Pro. (d) ISO + FGHP.
Figure 8Effects of FGHP on TNF-α and IL-6 in cardiac muscle in AMI rats by western blot analysis. ++P < 0.01 vs. the control group; P < 0.05 vs. the ISO group. Values are presented as mean ± SEM.