| Literature DB >> 32508677 |
Kun Liu1,2, Zhouying Duan2, Lihua Chen3, Zixing Wen1, Shengqun Zhu1, Qiang Qu1, Wenhua Chen1,2, Shuxin Zhang1, Bo Yu1,2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There were limited studies on the effect of skin temperature and local blood flow using kinesio tape (KT) adhered to the skin in different taping methods. This study aimed to determine the short-term effect of KT and athletic tape (AT) on skin temperature in the lower back and explore the possible effect of different taping methods (Y-strip and fan-strip taping) on local microcirculation.Entities:
Keywords: erector spinae; infrared thermal imaging; kinesio tape; skin temperature; taping shapes and materials
Year: 2020 PMID: 32508677 PMCID: PMC7251151 DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2020.00488
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Physiol ISSN: 1664-042X Impact factor: 4.566
Participants’ characteristics ( ± s).
| N | Male/Female | Age/years | Height/cm | Weight/kg | BMI/kg m–2 |
| 21 | 11/10 | 20.79 ± 1.58 | 170.72 ± 8.21 | 66.73 ± 12.27 | 22.81 ± 3.17 |
FIGURE 1Different taping methods with Kinesio Tape and Athletic Tape. (a) Y-strip of kinesio taping; (b) Y-strip of athletic taping; (c) fan-strip of kinesio taping; and (d) fan-strip of athletic taping.
FIGURE 2IRT measurement scenario for different taping methods with Kinesio Tape and Athletic Tape. (a) Y-strip of kinesio taping; (b) Y-strip of athletic taping; (c) fan-strip of kinesio taping; and (d) fan-strip of athletic taping. Note: In the infrared thermal image, the black line areas represent the region of interest (ROI).
Test-retest reliability of the infrared thermography measurement (n = 26).
| T1 | T2 | SD | ICC (95% CI) | SEM | MD | |
| 32.82 ± 0.59 | 32.77 ± 0.62 | 0.47 | 0.82(0.60,0.92) | 0.33 | 0.91 | 0.594 |
Room temperature, humidity, atmosphere of participants’ body temperature ( ± s).
| KY | Kfan | AY | Afan | NT | ηp2 | |||
| RT/°C | 24.62 ± 0.62 | 24.95 ± 0.63 | 24.69 ± 0.66 | 24.90 ± 0.62 | 24.76 ± 0.64 | 1.152 | 0.329 | 0.054 |
| H/% | 42.04 ± 3.58 | 40.57 ± 2.04 | 41.24 ± 3.75 | 40.67 ± 2.18 | 40.90 ± 3.49 | 0.837 | 0.453 | 0.040 |
| Atm/hpa | 1014.45 ± 6.53 | 1014.48 ± 4.78 | 1014.95 ± 6.12 | 1014.99 ± 5.00 | 1018.22 ± 5.78 | 2.060 | 0.142 | 0.093 |
| BT/°C | 36.29 ± 0.46 | 36.28 ± 0.45 | 36.30 ± 0.43 | 36.31 ± 0.47 | 36.34 ± 0.41 | 0.143 | 0.891 | 0.007 |
Comparison of skin temperature and self-perceived temperature for different taping methods ( ± s).
| KY | Kfan | AY | Afan | NT | F value | ηp2 | ||
| Pre_T/°C | 32.95 ± 0.60 | 32.83 ± 0.53 | 32.86 ± 0.66 | 32.91 ± 0.59 | 32.64 ± 0.64 | 0.958 | 0.406 | 0.046 |
| Pos_T/°C | 33.21 ± 0.64 | 33.39 ± 0.61 | 33.11 ± 0.57 | 33.21 ± 0.53 | 32.75 ± 0.60 | 3.435 | 0.012* | 0.147 |
| Self-Perceived | 6.68 ± 1.76 | 7.23 ± 1.41 | 6.45 ± 1.47 | 6.40 ± 1.73 | 6.16 ± 1.82 | 2.428 | 0.055 | 0.108 |
FIGURE 3Comparison of skin temperature at post-taping for different taping methods ( ± s). Note: ∗Significant difference between groups, p < 0.05.