| Literature DB >> 32508480 |
Mousumi Pal1, Debaleena Nawn2, Pooja Lahiri3, Debnath Das3, Ranjan Rashmi Paul1, Debjani Chakraborty4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In the context of early diagnosis and prevention of oral cancer, precise assessment of malignant potentiality of the oral potentially malignant disorders, particularly oral submucous fibrosis (OSF) is crucial. Till date, the assessment of malignant potentiality suffers from predictive ambiguity due to the lack of precision in the gold standard techniques. This can be addressed by integrating heuristic domain knowledge with quantitative analysis. AIM: The aim of this study is to propose an index for enhancing accuracy in malignant potentiality evaluation.Entities:
Keywords: Histomorphometry; malignant potentiality index; oral submucous fibrosis; weightage of features
Year: 2020 PMID: 32508480 PMCID: PMC7269314 DOI: 10.4103/jomfp.JOMFP_297_19
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Oral Maxillofac Pathol ISSN: 0973-029X
Figure 1Microphotograph (×200) of H&E staining of different study groups: (a) normal oral mucosa; (b) oral submucous fibrosis without dysplasia; (c) oral sub-mucous fibrosis with dysplasia
Figure 2Microphotograph (×400) of Van Gieson's staining of different study groups: (a) normal oral mucosa; (b) oral submucous fibrosis without dysplasia; (c) oral submucous fibrosis with dysplasia
Figure 3Microphotograph (×400) of periodic acid–Schiff staining of different study groups: (a) normal oral mucosa; (b) oral submucous fibrosis without dysplasia; (c) oral submucous fibrosis with dysplasia
Histopathological features with assigned weightage
| Chromaticity of nucleus-10 implies feature named Chromaticity of nucleus is assigned a weightage of 10 | Ratio of vasculature in connective tissue (area covered by blood vessels/total area)-5 implies 5 is assigned to this feature |
| Basal cell nuclear area-9.5 | Epithelial thickness-4 |
| Nuclear area/cytoplasm area-9 | Collagen density I2 (VG intensity at 50 μm below the junction)-2 |
| Collagen density I1 (VG intensity at the epithelialmesenchymal junction)-7 | Collagen density I3 (VG intensity at 100 μm below the junction)-1 |
| Thickness of basement membrane-6 |
VG: Van Gieson’s
Statistical significance test of the histopathological features among different study groups
| Features | NOM | OSFWTD | OSFWD | ANOVA | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Epithelial thickness (μm) | 338.30±90.37 | 143.17±31.4 | 296.12±64.68 | 210.7 | <0.0001 |
| Basal cell nuclear area (μm2) | 34.31±7.08 | 38.10±11.96 | 52.58±15.37 | 115.4 | <0.0001 |
| Nuclear area/cytoplasm area | 0.92±0.28 | 0.74±0.26 | 1.24±0.39 | 90.29 | <0.0001 |
| Grayscale intensity of nucleus (reciprocal of chromaticity) | 80.97±15.79 | 105.92±23.61 | 54.32±15.50 | 1862 | <0.0001 |
| Basement membrane thickness (μm) | 1.42±0.46 | 2.16±0.70 | 4.05±1.58 | 813.8 | <0.0001 |
| Ratio of vasculature in connective tissue (area covered by blood vessels/total area) | 0.13±0.02 | 0.09±0.02 | 0.16±0.02 | 52.68 | <0.0001 |
| Collagen density I1 (VG intensity at the epithelialmesenchymal junction) | 3.6±0.98 | 7.32±1.02 | 8.8±0.40 | 128.9 | <0.0001 |
| Collagen density I2 (VG intensity at 50 μm below the junction) | 4.5±1.18 | 7.075±1.37 | 8.55±0.63 | 186.5 | <0.0001 |
| Collagen density I3 (VG intensity at 100 μm below the junction) | 4.75±1.37 | 6.62±1.52 | 8.42±0.78 | 121.9 | <0.0001 |
NOM: Normal oral mucosa, OSF: Oral Submucous fibrosis, OSFWTD: OSF without dysplasia, OSFWD: OSF with dysplasia, ANOVA: Analysis of variance, VG: Van Gieson’s
Figure 4Notch box plot analysis of histopathology features among different study group (normal oral mucosa, oral submucous fibrosis without dysplasia and oral submucous fibrosis with dysplasia): (a) basement membrane thickness; (b) grayscale intensity of nucleus; (c) epithelial thickness; (d) ratio of nuclear area and cytoplasmic area; (e) basal cell nuclear area; (f) ratio of vasculature in connective tissue; Significance between groups: *P > 0.0001, **P < 0.0001