| Literature DB >> 32508446 |
Bhaskhar Abijeth1, Devaraj Ezhilarasan1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Syringic acid (SA) has long been used as traditional medicine and is known to have antioxidant, hepatoprotective, neuroprotective and anticancer effects. Studies regarding the anticancer effect of SA against squamous carcinoma cell (SCC)-25, human oral SCC (OSCC) line has not been studied. AIM: This study was aimed to evaluate the cytotoxic potentials of SA in SCC-25 cells.Entities:
Keywords: Caspases; cytochrome c; cytotoxicity; polyphenol
Year: 2020 PMID: 32508446 PMCID: PMC7269318 DOI: 10.4103/jomfp.JOMFP_178_19
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Oral Maxillofac Pathol ISSN: 0973-029X
Figure 1Morphology of squamous carcinoma cell-25 cells after SA treatment (×10). (a) Control; (b) dimethyl sulfoxide (c and d) syringic acid treatments 25 and 50 μM treatments, respectively. (e) Cytotoxic effect of syringic acid was analyzed by 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide assay. Squamous carcinoma cell-25 cells were treated with different concentrations of syringic acid for 24 h. Values are expressed as mean ± standard error of mean (n = 3)
Figure 2Apoptosis analysis by acridine orange/ethidium bromide (×10). (a) Control; (b) dimethyl sulfoxide; (c and d) syringic acid treatments 25 and 50 μM treatments, respectively. White arrowheads show the early apoptotic cells; Yellow arrowheads show late apoptotic and DNA fragmented cells. (e) Quantification of apoptotic cells. Values are expressed as mean ± standard error of mean (n = 3). ***P < 0.001 compared to control
Figure 3(a) Apoptotic marker gene expressions. GAPDH used as an internal control for optimization. (b) Quantification of gene expression values is expressed as mean ± standard error of mean (n = 3). P < 0.001 compared to control
Figure 4Probable mechanism of apoptosis induction by syringic acid treatment in squamous carcinoma cell-25 cells