Denise I Garcia1, Aaron P Lesher2, Corinne Corrigan3, H Ryan Howard2, Robert A Cina2. 1. Division of Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC. Electronic address: garciad@musc.edu. 2. Division of Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC. 3. Quality Department Medical University of South Carolina Children's Hospital, Charleston, SC.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Approaches to burn care in the pediatric population are highly variable and can be targeted as a potential measure in cost-reduction. We hypothesized that institutions vary significantly in treatment allocation of nonsevere burns to either inpatient or outpatient care. METHODS: We queried the PHIS database for fiscal year 2017 to quantify small pediatric burn admissions and Emergency Department visits (ED). The ICD-10 code T31.0 was used to identify burns involving <10% of total body surface area (TBSA). Centers were categorized by burn center status and length of stay, readmissions, and charges were compared. RESULTS: Inpatient versus outpatient management distribution was significantly different across the included pediatric children's hospitals (n = 34, p < 0.00001). When data were analyzed with respect to outpatient care, a bimodal distribution distinguished two groups: high hospital utilizers with an average of 30% outpatient burn care and low-utilizers averaging 87%. Median inpatient charge per patient was greater than 31-fold compared to ED burn management (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Variability of inpatient versus outpatient pediatric burn management in small burns was significant. Compared to outpatient burn care, inpatient care is significantly more costly. Implementing protocols and personnel to provide adequate attention to small burns in the ED could be an important cost-saving measure. TYPE OF STUDY: Retrospective analysis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.
BACKGROUND: Approaches to burn care in the pediatric population are highly variable and can be targeted as a potential measure in cost-reduction. We hypothesized that institutions vary significantly in treatment allocation of nonsevere burns to either inpatient or outpatient care. METHODS: We queried the PHIS database for fiscal year 2017 to quantify small pediatric burn admissions and Emergency Department visits (ED). The ICD-10 code T31.0 was used to identify burns involving <10% of total body surface area (TBSA). Centers were categorized by burn center status and length of stay, readmissions, and charges were compared. RESULTS: Inpatient versus outpatient management distribution was significantly different across the included pediatric children's hospitals (n = 34, p < 0.00001). When data were analyzed with respect to outpatient care, a bimodal distribution distinguished two groups: high hospital utilizers with an average of 30% outpatient burn care and low-utilizers averaging 87%. Median inpatient charge per patient was greater than 31-fold compared to ED burn management (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Variability of inpatient versus outpatient pediatric burn management in small burns was significant. Compared to outpatient burn care, inpatient care is significantly more costly. Implementing protocols and personnel to provide adequate attention to small burns in the ED could be an important cost-saving measure. TYPE OF STUDY: Retrospective analysis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.
Authors: Hala Bedri; Kathleen S Romanowski; Junlin Liao; Ghassan Al-Ramahi; Jason Heard; Thomas Granchi; Lucy Wibbenmeyer Journal: J Burn Care Res Date: 2017 May/Jun Impact factor: 1.845
Authors: Danielle B Cameron; Stephanie K Serres; Charity C Glass; Carly E Milliren; Dionne A Graham; Seema Anandalwar; Hariharan Thangarajah; Adam B Goldin; Matthew Hall; Shawn J Rangel Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2020-01 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Kathryn Tinsley Anderson; Marisa A Bartz-Kurycki; Grant M Garwood; Robert Martin; Rigoberto Gutierrez; Dylan N Supak; Stephanie N Wythe; Akemi L Kawaguchi; Mary T Austin; Todd F Huzar; KuoJen Tsao Journal: Surgery Date: 2018-08-26 Impact factor: 3.982
Authors: Matthew B Klein; C Bradley Kramer; Jason Nelson; Frederick P Rivara; Nicole S Gibran; Thomas Concannon Journal: JAMA Date: 2009-10-28 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Susan L Bratton; Christopher J L Newth; Athena F Zuppa; Frank W Moler; Kathleen L Meert; Robert A Berg; John Berger; David Wessel; Murray Pollack; Rick Harrison; Joseph A Carcillo; Thomas P Shanley; Teresa Liu; Richard Holubkov; J Michael Dean; Carol E Nicholson Journal: Pediatr Crit Care Med Date: 2012-07 Impact factor: 3.624