Rob Thinnes1, Morgan B Swanson2, Kristel Wetjen3, Karisa K Harland4, Nicholas M Mohr5. 1. Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, United States. Electronic address: Robert-Thinnes@uiowa.edu. 2. College of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology; Carver College of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, United States. Electronic address: Morgan-Bobb@uiowa.edu. 3. Stead Family Children's Hospital, Department of Surgery, Division of Pediatric Surgery, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, United States. Electronic address: Kristel-Wetjen@uiowa.edu. 4. College of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology; Carver College of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, United States. Electronic address: Kari-Harland@uiowa.edu. 5. College of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology, Carver College of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine; Department of Anesthesia Critical Care, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, United States. Electronic address: Nicholas-Mohr@uiowa.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Pre-hospital emergency medical services (EMS) transport can be associated with benefits following pediatric injury. However, many pediatric trauma patients do not use EMS. The objective of this study was to elucidate guardians' decision factors for pre-hospital transport for children after injury. METHODS: This is a multi-methods study of pediatric trauma patients (≤14 years) and their guardians presenting to the ED of a Level I Pediatric Trauma Center via both EMS and non-EMS modalities. Demographic information and injury characteristics were collected. Semi-structured interviews were conducted, and qualitative codes were identified and assigned into themes. RESULTS: (Quantitative): Of the 29 child-guardian pairs, five participants initially presented by EMS, 18 were admitted, and the majority (66%) sustained mild injuries. Guardians' assessment of their child's injury severity did not correlate with Injury Severity Score (ISS). Neither EMS status (did or did not use EMS to transport to first hospital) nor rurality status of participants' place of residence were associated with disparate management in any of the three scenarios. (QUALITATIVE): Five themes emerged, which informed guardians' transport decisions: Factors Related to the Nature of the Patient's Injury, Guardian Attributes and Prior Experiences, Access and Availability of EMS, Perceived Risks and Benefits of EMS and Hospital, and Collaborative Decision-Making. Injury characteristics and contextual factors, like perceived EMS response times and advice from family or medical providers, were considered in choices about EMS utilization and hospital selection. Despite the view that EMS response times were important in determining what to do following injury, both EMS and non-EMS users were largely unfamiliar with the capabilities of EMS in their area. Finally, guardians described cost to be a theoretical risk of EMS use, and a few cited this as a factor contributing to their decision-making. CONCLUSIONS: Guardians used a variety of considerations to make transport decisions, including the five themes identified above. Future studies could explore modalities to disseminate information about pre-hospital decision-making for guardians and determine the relationship between EMS utilization and patient outcomes.
BACKGROUND: Pre-hospital emergency medical services (EMS) transport can be associated with benefits following pediatric injury. However, many pediatric traumapatients do not use EMS. The objective of this study was to elucidate guardians' decision factors for pre-hospital transport for children after injury. METHODS: This is a multi-methods study of pediatric traumapatients (≤14 years) and their guardians presenting to the ED of a Level I Pediatric Trauma Center via both EMS and non-EMS modalities. Demographic information and injury characteristics were collected. Semi-structured interviews were conducted, and qualitative codes were identified and assigned into themes. RESULTS: (Quantitative): Of the 29 child-guardian pairs, five participants initially presented by EMS, 18 were admitted, and the majority (66%) sustained mild injuries. Guardians' assessment of their child's injury severity did not correlate with Injury Severity Score (ISS). Neither EMS status (did or did not use EMS to transport to first hospital) nor rurality status of participants' place of residence were associated with disparate management in any of the three scenarios. (QUALITATIVE): Five themes emerged, which informed guardians' transport decisions: Factors Related to the Nature of the Patient's Injury, Guardian Attributes and Prior Experiences, Access and Availability of EMS, Perceived Risks and Benefits of EMS and Hospital, and Collaborative Decision-Making. Injury characteristics and contextual factors, like perceived EMS response times and advice from family or medical providers, were considered in choices about EMS utilization and hospital selection. Despite the view that EMS response times were important in determining what to do following injury, both EMS and non-EMS users were largely unfamiliar with the capabilities of EMS in their area. Finally, guardians described cost to be a theoretical risk of EMS use, and a few cited this as a factor contributing to their decision-making. CONCLUSIONS: Guardians used a variety of considerations to make transport decisions, including the five themes identified above. Future studies could explore modalities to disseminate information about pre-hospital decision-making for guardians and determine the relationship between EMS utilization and patient outcomes.
Authors: Michelle M Corrado; Junxin Shi; Krista K Wheeler; Jin Peng; Brian Kenney; Sarah Johnson; Huiyun Xiang Journal: Am J Emerg Med Date: 2016-11-30 Impact factor: 2.469
Authors: Michael P Goldman; Ambrose H Wong; Ambika Bhatnagar; Beth L Emerson; Linda L Brown; Marc A Auerbach Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2018-08-10 Impact factor: 3.451
Authors: Joshua B Brown; Mark L Gestring; Christine M Leeper; Jason L Sperry; Andrew B Peitzman; Timothy R Billiar; Barbara A Gaines Journal: J Trauma Acute Care Surg Date: 2017-06 Impact factor: 3.313
Authors: Manish N Shah; Jeremy T Cushman; Colleen O Davis; Jeffrey J Bazarian; Peggy Auinger; Bruce Friedman Journal: Prehosp Emerg Care Date: 2008 Jul-Sep Impact factor: 3.077
Authors: Rachel B Webman; Elizabeth A Carter; Sushil Mittal; Jichaun Wang; Chethan Sathya; Avery B Nathens; Michael L Nance; David Madigan; Randall S Burd Journal: JAMA Pediatr Date: 2016-08-01 Impact factor: 16.193
Authors: Monica Brova; Krislyn M Boggs; Kori S Zachrison; Rachel D Freid; Ashley F Sullivan; Janice A Espinola; Tehnaz P Boyle; Carlos A Camargo Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2018-11-08 Impact factor: 3.451