Elise G Kramer1, Stephen J Vincent2. 1. Miami Contact Lens Institute, Miami, FL, USA. Electronic address: elise@miamicontactlens.com. 2. Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Centre for Vision and Eye Research, School of Optometry and Vision Science, Contact Lens and Visual Optics Laboratory, Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland, Australia. Electronic address: sj.vincent@qut.edu.au.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To examine the variation in intraocular pressure (IOP) during the first six months of scleral lens wear. METHODS: Thirty-two neophyte scleral lens wearers were recruited and IOP was measured using Goldman applanation tonometry before, and after 1 and 6 months of scleral lens wear (following lens removal). All scleral lenses were designed based on scleral topography or an impression of the ocular surface. Central corneal thickness and the central post-lens fluid reservoir thickness were quantified using optical coherence tomography. RESULTS: Post-lens removal IOP displayed an increasing trend after 1 and 6 months of lens wear, but the magnitude of change was not clinically or statistically significant using several repeated measures analyses to account for sporadic missing longitudinal data (mean increase of 1 mmHg or less, p > 0.05). Central corneal thickness and the central post-lens fluid reservoir remained stable throughout the first six months of lens wear. CONCLUSION: IOP measured following lens removal did not vary significantly during the first 6 months of lens wear in scleral lens neophytes. Further research is required to determine if IOP varies during lens wear, following lens removal, or after longer-term lens wear due to suction forces or tissue compression beneath the landing zone.
PURPOSE: To examine the variation in intraocular pressure (IOP) during the first six months of scleral lens wear. METHODS: Thirty-two neophyte scleral lens wearers were recruited and IOP was measured using Goldman applanation tonometry before, and after 1 and 6 months of scleral lens wear (following lens removal). All scleral lenses were designed based on scleral topography or an impression of the ocular surface. Central corneal thickness and the central post-lens fluid reservoir thickness were quantified using optical coherence tomography. RESULTS: Post-lens removal IOP displayed an increasing trend after 1 and 6 months of lens wear, but the magnitude of change was not clinically or statistically significant using several repeated measures analyses to account for sporadic missing longitudinal data (mean increase of 1 mmHg or less, p > 0.05). Central corneal thickness and the central post-lens fluid reservoir remained stable throughout the first six months of lens wear. CONCLUSION: IOP measured following lens removal did not vary significantly during the first 6 months of lens wear in scleral lens neophytes. Further research is required to determine if IOP varies during lens wear, following lens removal, or after longer-term lens wear due to suction forces or tissue compression beneath the landing zone.