Literature DB >> 32507343

Using the American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System at the Point of Care: Sonographer Performance and Interobserver Variability.

Benjamin Wildman-Tobriner1, Salmaan Ahmed2, Al Erkanli3, Maciej A Mazurowski4, Jenny K Hoang5.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess inter-observer variability and performance when sonographers assign features to thyroid nodules on ultrasound using the American College of Radiology (ACR) Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (TI-RADS). Fifteen sonographers retrospectively evaluated 100 thyroid nodules and assigned features to each nodule according to ACR TI-RADS lexicon. Ratings were compared with one another and to a gold standard using Fleiss' and Cohen's kappa statistics, respectively. Sonographers were also asked subjective questions regarding their comfort level assessing each feature, and opinions were compared with performance using a mixed effects model. Sonographers demonstrated only slight agreement for margin (κ = 0.18, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.16-0.20) and large comet tail artifact (κ = 0.08, 95% CI: 0.06-0.10) but better performance for macrocalcification (κ = 0.41, 95% CI: 0.39-0.43) and no echogenic foci (κ = 0.52, 95% CI: 0.50-0.54). Sonographer comfort level with different feature assignments did not statistically correlate with performance for a given feature. In conclusion, sonographers using ACR TI-RADS to assign thyroid nodule features on ultrasound demonstrate a range of agreement across features, with margin and large comet tail artifact showing the most variability. These results highlight potential areas of focus for sonographer education efforts as ACR TI-RADS continues to be implemented in radiology departments.
Copyright © 2020 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  FNA; Follow-up; TI-RADS; Ultrasound

Year:  2020        PMID: 32507343     DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2020.04.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol        ISSN: 0301-5629            Impact factor:   2.998


  5 in total

1.  Clinician Agreement on the Classification of Thyroid Nodules Ultrasound Features: A Survey of 2 Endocrine Societies.

Authors:  Nydia Burgos; Jing Zhao; Juan P Brito; Jenny K Hoang; Fabian Pitoia; Spyridoula Maraka; M Regina Castro; Ji-Hyun Lee; Naykky Singh Ospina
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2022-07-14       Impact factor: 6.134

2.  Reducing the Number of Unnecessary Thyroid Nodule Biopsies With the American College of Radiology (ACR) Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (TI-RADS).

Authors:  Bader Abou Shaar; Moussa Meteb; Ghassan Awad El-Karim; Youssef Almalki
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-03-13

3.  Tips for improving consistency of thyroid nodule interpretation with ACR TI-RADS.

Authors:  Gavin Low; Meredith Bara; Yang Du; Prayash Katlariwala; Roger Croutze; Katrin Resch; Jonathan Porter; Medica Sam; Mitchell Wilson
Journal:  J Ultrason       Date:  2022-02-08

4.  Summary of Meta-analyses of Studies Considering Lesion Size Cut-off Thresholds for The Assessment of Eligibility for FNAB and Sonoelastography and Inter- and Intra-observer Agreement in Estimating the Malignant Potential of Focal Lesions of The Thyroid Gland.

Authors:  Katarzyna Dobruch-Sobczak; Zbigniew Adamczewski; Marek Dedecjus; Andrzej Lewiński; Bartosz Migda; Marek Ruchała; Anna Skowrońska-Szcześniak; Ewelina Szczepanek-Parulska; Klaudia Zajkowska; Agnieszka Żyłka
Journal:  J Ultrason       Date:  2022-04-27

5.  Diagnostic Performances of the ACR-TIRADS System in Thyroid Nodules Triage: A Prospective Single Center Study.

Authors:  Davide Leni; Davide Seminati; Davide Fior; Francesco Vacirca; Giulia Capitoli; Laura Cazzaniga; Camillo Di Bella; Vincenzo L'Imperio; Stefania Galimberti; Fabio Pagni
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 6.639

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.