John R Craig1, Roderick W Tataryn2,3, Tara L Aghaloo4, Alan T Pokorny5,6, Stacey T Gray7, Jose L Mattos8, David M Poetker9. 1. Department of Otolaryngology, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI. 2. Tataryn Endodontics, Spokane, WA. 3. Department of Endodontics, School of Dentistry, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA. 4. University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) School of Dentistry, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA. 5. Spokane ENT Clinic, Spokane, WA. 6. Department of Otolaryngology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA. 7. Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA. 8. Department of Otolaryngology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA. 9. Department of Otolaryngology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Odontogenic sinusitis (ODS) can present a therapeutic dilemma because multiple treatment strategies have been reported. ODS review articles have been published, but they have lacked multidisciplinary collaboration and an evidence-based methodology. The purpose of this article was to perform an evidence-based review of ODS management options, and develop a multidisciplinary consensus statement on ODS management options. METHODS: An evidence-based review of dental and medical literature on ODS management was performed using PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Review Databases up to December 2019. Exclusion criteria included non-English-language articles, case series with fewer than 10 patients, fungal sinusitis, and studies that did not report treatment success rates. Because aggregate levels of evidence for recommendations were no higher than level C, a clinical consensus statement was conducted using a modified Delphi method. RESULTS: Sixteen articles met inclusion criteria for the evidence-based review on the following ODS management options: dental treatment alone or combined with ESS for various dental pathologies, and endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) alone for dental implant-related ODS. Strong consensus was achieved for 9 of the 10 clinical statements, the strongest being the use of shared decision-making for selecting management strategies. No consensus was reached for determining the extent of ESS necessary for uncomplicated ODS. CONCLUSION: Strong consensus was reached that ODS management should involve shared decision-making between the otolaryngologist, dental provider, and patient, where the benefits and risks of dental treatment and ESS are discussed. Higher-quality studies are necessary to develop evidence-based treatment recommendations for ODS.
BACKGROUND:Odontogenic sinusitis (ODS) can present a therapeutic dilemma because multiple treatment strategies have been reported. ODS review articles have been published, but they have lacked multidisciplinary collaboration and an evidence-based methodology. The purpose of this article was to perform an evidence-based review of ODS management options, and develop a multidisciplinary consensus statement on ODS management options. METHODS: An evidence-based review of dental and medical literature on ODS management was performed using PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Review Databases up to December 2019. Exclusion criteria included non-English-language articles, case series with fewer than 10 patients, fungal sinusitis, and studies that did not report treatment success rates. Because aggregate levels of evidence for recommendations were no higher than level C, a clinical consensus statement was conducted using a modified Delphi method. RESULTS: Sixteen articles met inclusion criteria for the evidence-based review on the following ODS management options: dental treatment alone or combined with ESS for various dental pathologies, and endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) alone for dental implant-related ODS. Strong consensus was achieved for 9 of the 10 clinical statements, the strongest being the use of shared decision-making for selecting management strategies. No consensus was reached for determining the extent of ESS necessary for uncomplicated ODS. CONCLUSION: Strong consensus was reached that ODS management should involve shared decision-making between the otolaryngologist, dental provider, and patient, where the benefits and risks of dental treatment and ESS are discussed. Higher-quality studies are necessary to develop evidence-based treatment recommendations for ODS.
Authors: Antonio M Bulfamante; Carlotta Pipolo; Umberto D'Agostino Fiorenza; Flavio Arnone; Paolo Lozza; Giovanni Felisati; Alberto Maria Saibene Journal: Clin Case Rep Date: 2020-12-14