Kishan Gokaraju1, Peter Domos2, Osama Aweid3, Rachael Fisher3, Andrew White3, Lee Van Rensburg4, Sertaz-Niel Kang4. 1. Trauma & Orthopaedics, Barnet General Hospital, Wellhouse Lane, Barnet, EN5 3DJ, UK. kgokaraju@hotmail.com. 2. Trauma & Orthopaedics, Barnet General Hospital, Wellhouse Lane, Barnet, EN5 3DJ, UK. 3. Trauma & Orthopaedics, Peterborough City Hospital, Edith Cavell Campus, Bretton Gate, Peterborough, PE3 9GZ, UK. 4. Trauma & Orthopaedics, Addenbrookes Hospital, Hills Rd, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The available literature discussing optimal surgical management of Mason II and III radial head (RH) fractures without concomitant bone or ligamentous injuries is limited. We aim to help determine the appropriate management of these functionally significant injuries. DESIGN: We present our retrospective cohort study of outcomes of surgically managed isolated, displaced RH fractures SETTING: Study from three trauma centres. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Adults who underwent surgical treatment for isolated displaced RH fractures. INTERVENTION: RH open reduction internal fixation (ORIF), replacement or excision MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Elbow range of motion (ROM), pain and function using Oxford Elbow Score (OES), Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), Patient-Rated Elbow Evaluation (PREE) and QuickDASH (QD). RESULTS: Of 46 patients included (mean age 47 years and mean follow-up 48 months), 12 type II fractures were treated with ORIF and 34 type III injuries had ORIF (16), replacement (12) or resection (6). ROM was comparable in all groups, with mean arcs of flexion-extension of 131° and pronation-supination of 147°. Mean visual analogue score for pain was 1.3 in those treated with ORIF compared to 1.9 with arthroplasty and 2.5 with excision. Mean functional scores were 41, 92, 14 and 14 for OES, MEPS, PREE and QD, respectively. Complication rates were 39% for ORIF, 33% for arthroplasty and 33% for resection. Overall re-operation rate was 13%. CONCLUSIONS: Functional outcome is similar in all groups of surgically treated patients with isolated, displaced RH fractures. Complication rates are higher than that reported previously in the literature but with low re-operation rates. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.
OBJECTIVES: The available literature discussing optimal surgical management of Mason II and III radial head (RH) fractures without concomitant bone or ligamentous injuries is limited. We aim to help determine the appropriate management of these functionally significant injuries. DESIGN: We present our retrospective cohort study of outcomes of surgically managed isolated, displaced RH fractures SETTING: Study from three trauma centres. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Adults who underwent surgical treatment for isolated displaced RH fractures. INTERVENTION: RH open reduction internal fixation (ORIF), replacement or excision MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Elbow range of motion (ROM), pain and function using Oxford Elbow Score (OES), Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), Patient-Rated Elbow Evaluation (PREE) and QuickDASH (QD). RESULTS: Of 46 patients included (mean age 47 years and mean follow-up 48 months), 12 type II fractures were treated with ORIF and 34 type III injuries had ORIF (16), replacement (12) or resection (6). ROM was comparable in all groups, with mean arcs of flexion-extension of 131° and pronation-supination of 147°. Mean visual analogue score for pain was 1.3 in those treated with ORIF compared to 1.9 with arthroplasty and 2.5 with excision. Mean functional scores were 41, 92, 14 and 14 for OES, MEPS, PREE and QD, respectively. Complication rates were 39% for ORIF, 33% for arthroplasty and 33% for resection. Overall re-operation rate was 13%. CONCLUSIONS: Functional outcome is similar in all groups of surgically treated patients with isolated, displaced RH fractures. Complication rates are higher than that reported previously in the literature but with low re-operation rates. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.
Entities:
Keywords:
Fracture; Isolated; Radial head; Surgery