Literature DB >> 32505414

Bony increased-offset-reverse shoulder arthroplasty: 5 to 10 years' follow-up.

Pascal Boileau1, Nicolas Morin-Salvo2, Charles Bessière3, Mikaël Chelli4, Marc-Olivier Gauci4, Devin B Lemmex5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Glenoid lateralization has been shown to be the most imortant factor in maximizing passive range of motion and shoulder stability while preventing scapular impingement and notching. We aimed to evaluate mid- to long-term functional and radiologic outcomes after bony increased-offset-reverse shoulder arthroplasty (BIO-RSA) using a Grammont-style (medialized) humeral implant.
METHODS: The study included 143 consecutive shoulders (140 patients; mean age, 72 years) treated with a BIO-RSA for rotator cuff deficiency. A cylinder of autologous cancellous bone graft, harvested from the humeral head, was placed between the reamed glenoid surface and baseplate; fixation was achieved using a long central peg (25 mm) and 4 screws. A large baseplate (29 mm) with a small baseplate sphere (36 mm) was used in 77% of cases, and a Grammont-style (medialized) humeral implant with 155° of inclination was used in all cases. All patients underwent clinical and radiographic assessment at a minimum of 5 years after surgery; in addition, 86 cases (60%) underwent computed tomography scan assessment.
RESULTS: At a mean follow-up of 75 months (range, 60-126 months), the survivorship of the BIO-RSA using revision as an endpoint was 96%. No cases of dislocation or humeral loosening were observed. Overall, 118 patients (83%) were either very satisfied (61%) or satisfied (22%). The adjusted Constant score improved from 40% ± 18% to 93% ± 23%, and the Subjective Shoulder Value improved from 31% ± 15% to 77% ± 18% (P < .001). The humeral bone graft incorporated completely in 96% of cases (137 of 143). Severe inferior scapular notching (grade 3 or 4) occurred in 18% (24 of 136). The risk of postoperative notching correlated to a lower body mass index (P < .05), superior glenosphere inclination (P = .02), and high or flush glenosphere positioning (P = .035).
CONCLUSIONS: BIO-RSA is a safe and effective technique to lateralize the glenoid, providing consistent bone graft healing, excellent functional outcomes, a low revision rate, and a high rate of patient satisfaction. Thin patients (with a low body mass index) and glenosphere malposition (with persistent superior inclination and/or insufficient lowering of the baseplate and sphere) are associated with higher risk of scapular notching.Our data confirm the importance of implanting the baseplate with a neutral inclination (reverse shoulder arthroplasty angle < 5°) and with sufficient glenosphere inferior overhang (>5 mm) in preventing scapular notching. The use of a less medialized humeral implant (135° or 145° inclined) and smaller (25-mm) baseplate (when using a small, 36-mm sphere) should allow reduction in the incidence of scapular notching.
Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Reverse shoulder arthroplasty; bony increased-offset–reverse shoulder arthroplasty (BIO-RSA); glenoid bone graft; glenoid inclination; glenoid lateralization; scapular notching

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32505414     DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.02.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg        ISSN: 1058-2746            Impact factor:   3.019


  7 in total

1.  Metallic humeral and glenoid lateralized implants in reverse shoulder arthroplasty for cuff tear arthropathy and primary osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Jan-Philipp Imiolczyk; Laurent Audigé; Viktoria Harzbecker; Philipp Moroder; Markus Scheibel
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2021-12-14

2.  Analysis of the coaptation role of the deltoid in reverse shoulder arthroplasty. A preliminary biomechanical study.

Authors:  Lucas Martinez; Margaux Machefert; Thomas Poirier; Jean Matsoukis; Fabien Billuart
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-08-18       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Medium- to Long-Term Outcomes after Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty with a Standard Long Stem.

Authors:  Matthias Bülhoff; Felix Zeifang; Caroline Welters; Tobias Renkawitz; Marcus Schiltenwolf; Anna-K Tross
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-04-19       Impact factor: 4.964

4.  Clinical and radiographic outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty using a hybrid baseplate fixation mechanism.

Authors:  Lionel Neyton; Ana Nigues; Floris Van Rooij; Sheng Zhang; Philippe Collin
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2021-09-04

5.  Inverted-Bearing Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty: Consequences on Scapular Notching and Clinical Results at Mid-Term Follow-Up.

Authors:  Alessandro Castagna; Mario Borroni; Luigi Dubini; Stefano Gumina; Giacomo Delle Rose; Riccardo Ranieri
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 4.964

6.  A novel method for localization of the maximum glenoid bone defect during reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Graeme T Harding; Aaron J Bois; Martin J Bouliane
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2021-04-28

7.  Adjusting Implant Size and Position Can Improve Internal Rotation After Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty in a Three-dimensional Computational Model.

Authors:  Eric G Huish; George S Athwal; Lionel Neyton; Gilles Walch
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 4.755

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.