Literature DB >> 32504964

Anesthesia and infection control in cesarean section of pregnant women with COVID-19 infection: A descriptive study.

Linli Yue1, Lefei Han2, Qiannan Li1, Min Zhong1, Jun Wang1, Zhenzhen Wan1, Caijuan Chu1, Yi Zeng1, Min Peng3, Na Li4, Lin Yang5.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32504964      PMCID: PMC7253971          DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2020.109908

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Anesth        ISSN: 0952-8180            Impact factor:   9.452


× No keyword cloud information.
To the editor From January 24 to March 15, 2020, there were 3294 pregnant women who had vaginal or operative deliveries in the Maternal and Children Health Hospital of Hubei Province in Wuhan, China, of whom 110 with suspected and confirmed COVID-19 infection. Given an increasing number of pregnant women, COVID-19 infection has been as one indication for cesarean section since 24 January 2020 in our hospital. Anesthesiologists had a high exposure risk to SARS-CoV-2 when conducting cesarean section for pregnant women with COVID-19. In response, we upgraded infection prevention and control (IPC) practice to the highest level according to the national guideline [1]. One negative pressure operating room was dedicated to all operations on pregnant women with confirmed COVID-19 pneumonia. Pregnant women with confirmed and suspected COVID-19 were required to wear a surgical mask upon arrival to operation room during surgery. They were moved to isolation wards immediately after surgery. Some newborns stayed in neonatal wards and others were sent home to be taken care by family members. Here we reported the safety and efficacy of the combined spinal-epidural anesthesia (CSEA) and infection control measures on perinatal care quality of 14 pregnant women with confirmed COVID-19 infection. The ethical approval has been obtained from the Ethics Committee of the Hubei Provincial Maternal and Child Health Center [2020-IEC-LW011]. The requirement for written informed consent was waived by the Ethics Committee since the data were encrypted. We followed a standard protocol of the CSEA procedure in our hospital. Intraspinal anesthesia (0.5% ropivacaine at 10–15 mg) was administered using pencil-point spinal needles at L2–3. An epidural catheter was inserted toward the head as a rescue pathway during operation and also for postoperative analgesia. For postoperative analgesia, dezocine (5 mg/ml) at 5–10 mg was immediately administered by intravenous infusion after delivery, combined with morphine (0.2 mg/ml) at 2 mg injected via epidural catheter at the end of cesarean section. Dezocine is an opioid kappa-receptor antagonist and a mu-receptor partial agonist, which has been widely used in postoperative analgesia in China and other Asian countries [2,3]. Anesthesia results of fourteen patients with confirmed COVID-19 infection are summarized in Table 1 . Most patients had sensory blockade levels above T5 and Bromage scale of 3 during operation. The mean duration of puncture and surgery was 3.7 and 39.4 min respectively. The vital signs of patients remained stable during the surgery. The patients achieved satisfactory visual analogue scale (VAS) and Bruggmann Comfort Scale scores (BCS). Some minor complications were reported in these patients, including itchiness, postoperative vomit and nausea, pain at puncture site. None of the patients reported the incidence of severe obstetric complications related to anesthesia and surgeries.
Table 1

Anesthesia evaluations in patients with confirmed COVID-19 infection.

Confirmed cases (n = 14)
ASA score I/II, n (%)14 (100%)
Dosage of ropivacaine, mean ± SD (mg)12.0 ± 0.8
Duration of puncture, mean ± SD (min)3.7 ± 1.5
Sensory blockade level, 10 min after anesthesia, n (%)
 T45 (35.7%)
 T55 (35.7%)
 T64 (28.6%)
 T70 (0.0%)
Modified Bromage scale, 10 min after anesthesia, n (%)
 24 (28.6%)
 310 (71.4%)
Sensory blockade level, immediate after surgery, n (%)
 T41 (7.1%)
 T57 (50.0%)
 T65 (35.7%)
 T71 (7.1%)
 T80 (0.0%)
Modified Bromage scale, immediate after surgery, n (%)
 312 (85.7%)
Intraoperative hypotension, n (%)a0 (0.0%)
Intraoperative sedation, n (%)0 (0.0%)
Airway management during operation0 (0.0%)
Dosage of atropine, mean ± SD (mg)0 ± 0
Dosage of ephedrine, mean ± SD (mg)0 ± 0
Grade of anesthesia effect, n (%)
 111 (78.6%)
 23 (21.4%)

Hypotension defined as systolic blood pressure < 80 mmHg or ≥30% decrease relative to baseline blood pressure.

Anesthesia evaluations in patients with confirmed COVID-19 infection. Hypotension defined as systolic blood pressure < 80 mmHg or ≥30% decrease relative to baseline blood pressure. We previously reported that COVID-19 infection caused relatively mild symptoms in pregnant women, who rarely had hypoxia or respiratory failure. The maternal and neonatal outcomes were also comparable to other pregnant women without infection [4]. Another study in Wuhan reported that 12 out of 14 pregnant women experienced hypotension during the cesarean section under epidural anesthesia [5]. However, very few incidences of hypotension had occurred in our patients (zero in confirmed cases, and 4 out of 16 in suspected ones). This could be owing to administration of dezocine and morphine in our anesthesia procedure, but it requires further investigations from more studies. In cesarean section for pregnant women with COVID-19 infection, CSEA was safe and efficient in achieving satisfactory obstetrical anesthesia and could also assist administration of dezocine and morphine for postoperative analgesia. No adverse events associated with anesthesia and surgery were found in these patients, and no cross-infection occurred in the HCWs working in these operations while wearing a full set of personal protective equipment.

Funding support

NL is supported by the Joint Fund of the Hubei Provincial Health Commission. L. Yang is supported by the Alibaba (China) Collaborative Fund (P0031768).

Authors' contributions

L Yue conceived the study and collected the data; LH analyzed the data, and drafted the manuscript; QL, MZ, JW, ZW, CC, YZ helped collect the original data and review the final manuscript; MP contributed to drafting the paper; L Yang and NL revised the manuscript; All the authors reviewed and approved the final manuscript.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors report no potential conflicts of interest.
  3 in total

Review 1.  Impact of COVID-19 on maternal and neonatal outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Francesca Di Toro; Mattheus Gjoka; Giovanni Di Lorenzo; Davide De Santo; Francesco De Seta; Gianpaolo Maso; Francesco Maria Risso; Federico Romano; Uri Wiesenfeld; Roberto Levi-D'Ancona; Luca Ronfani; Giuseppe Ricci
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 8.067

2.  Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 through breast milk and breastfeeding: a living systematic review.

Authors:  Elizabeth Centeno-Tablante; Melisa Medina-Rivera; Julia L Finkelstein; Pura Rayco-Solon; Maria Nieves Garcia-Casal; Lisa Rogers; Kate Ghezzi-Kopel; Pratiwi Ridwan; Juan Pablo Peña-Rosas; Saurabh Mehta
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2020-08-28       Impact factor: 5.691

3.  Perioperative Outcomes in COVID-19 Obstetric Patients Undergoing Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Section: A Prospective Observational Study.

Authors:  Omar Ababneh; Mustafa Alrabayah; Ahmad I El-Share'; Isam Bsisu; Yara Bahar; Banan Dabousi; Alia Sandoqa; Dania AlWreikat; Ayman Qatawneh
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-24
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.