| Literature DB >> 32504913 |
Lauren C Houghton1, Rebecca Troisi2, Marni Sommer3, Hormuzd A Katki4, Mark Booth5, Osul A Choudhury6, Kate R Hampshire7.
Abstract
Early puberty is a risk factor for adult diseases and biomedical and psychosocial research implicate growth (in height and weight) and stress as modifiable drivers of early puberty. Seldom have studies examined these drivers simultaneously or concurrently using quantitative and qualitative methods. Within the context of migration, we used mixed-methods to compare growth, stress and puberty in a study of 488 girls, aged 5-16, who were either Bangladeshi, first-generation migrant to the UK, second-generation migrant, or white British (conducted between 2009 and 2011). Using a biocultural framework, we asked the questions: 1) Does migration accelerate pubertal processes? 2) What biocultural markers are associated with migration? 3) What biocultural markers are associated with puberty? Girls self-reported pubertal stage, recalled 24-h dietary intake, and answered questions relating to dress, food, and ethnic identity. We collected anthropometrics and assayed saliva specimens for dehydroepiandrosterone-sulfate (DHEA-S) to assess adrenarcheal status. Our findings demonstrate that first-generation migrants had earlier puberty than second-generation migrants and Bangladeshi girls. British style of dress did not increase with migration, while dietary choices did, which were reflected in increasing body mass index. However, the widely-used phrase, "I'm proud of my religion, but not my culture" demonstrated that ethnic identity was aligned more with Islamic religion than 'Bangladeshi culture.' This was epitomized by wearing the hijab, but denial of eating rice. The social correlates of puberty, such as 'practicing' wearing the hijab and becoming 'dedicated to the scarf,' occurred at the same ages as adrenarche and menarche, respectively, among first-generation girls. We suggest that the rejection of 'Bangladeshi culture' might be a source of psychosocial stress for first-generation girls, and this may explain elevated DHEA-S levels and early puberty compared to their second-generation counterparts. Our results support a biocultural model of adolescence, a period for biological embedding of culture, when biological and psychosocial factors adjust developmental timing with potential positive and negative implications for long-term health.Entities:
Keywords: Androgens; Biocultural; Migration; Mixed-methods; Puberty
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32504913 PMCID: PMC7369632 DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113058
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Soc Sci Med ISSN: 0277-9536 Impact factor: 4.634
Fig. 1Generalized Model for Bio(cultural)markers, adapted from Worthman and Costello (2009). Panel A is Worthman and Costello's biomarker model and Panel B is our adapted biocultural marker model for puberty.
Fig. 3Hijab Styles. A) hijab scarf secured with pins B) pre-sewn hijab C) fashion hijab D) loose gumpta or orna (illustration by Stacy Antoville).
Fig. 4Median ages of biological and social correlates of puberty in bangladeshi, first-generation, second-generation, white british girls in the ABBY project.
Timing and tempo of puberty by migration scale.
| n | Bangladeshi | 1st Generation | 2nd Generation | White British | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 162 | 40 | 159 | 48 | ||||||
| Adrenarche | 0.868 | 0.707 | 0.007 | ||||||
| Thelarche | <0.001 | 0.0003 | 0.553 | ||||||
| Pubarche | 0.018 | 0.009 | 0.032 | ||||||
| Menarche | 0.792 | 0.637 | 0.559 | ||||||
| Adrenarche | 7.2 | 5.3 | 7.4 | 7.1 | |||||
| Thelarche | 10.7 | 9.2 | 9.6 | 8.7 | |||||
| Pubarche | 12.5 | 13.2 | 11.6 | 10.9 | |||||
| Menarche | 12.5 | 11.8 | 12.1 | 12.6 | |||||
| Juvenile Tempo (Adrenarche to Thelarche) | |||||||||
| Pubertal Tempo (Thelarche to menarche) | |||||||||
Body mass index, overweight and obesity and the association (β* and P-value) between BMI z-scores and the timing of adrenarche, thelarche and menarche in Bangladeshi, First-Generation, Second-Generation and white British girls in the ABBY Project, derived from Weibull Models.
| N | Body Size | Pubertal Outcomes | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMI | Overweight/Obese | Adrenarche | Thelarche | Menarche | |||||
| Mean (SD) | % | β | P | β | p | β | p | ||
| Overall | 410 | 18.2 (3.9) | 25% | 0.08 | 0.16 | 0.29 | <0.001 | 0.10 | 0.34 |
| Bangladeshi | 165 | 16.4 (3.4) | 8.4% | 0.09 | 0.37 | 0.48 | 0.001 | 0.38 | 0.08 |
| First-Generation | 39 | 19.6 (4.3) | 35% | 0.28 | 0.33 | 0.02 | 0.92 | −0.23 | 0.50 |
| Second-Generation | 156 | 18.8 (3.6) | 32% | 0.07 | 0.49 | 0.06 | 0.59 | −0.09 | 0.61 |
| White British | 50 | 19.9 (3.8) | 48% | 0.37 | 0.18 | 0.82 | 0.01 | 0.39 | 0.30 |
*a positive β represents an earlier age at pubertal outcome per unit increase in BMI z-score.
Fig. 2Joint quantitative and qualitative display of biocultural markers among Sylheti, First-generation, Second-generation and white British girls.