Bangshun He1, Aifang Zhong2, Qiuyue Wu3, Xiong Liu4, Jie Lin5, Chao Chen6, Yiming He6, Yanju Guo3, Man Zhang3, Peiran Zhu3, Jian Wu3, Changjun Wang7, Shukui Wang8, Xinyi Xia9. 1. COVID-19 Research Center, Institute of Laboratory Medicine, Jinling Hospital, Nanjing University School of Medicine, Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210002, China; General Clinical Research Center, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210006, China. 2. Medical Technical Support Division, Changzhou Medical District, the 904th Hospital, Changzhou, Jiangsu, 213003, China; Department of Laboratory Medicine & Blood Transfusion, Wuhan Huoshenshan Hospital, Wuhan, Hubei, 430100, China. 3. COVID-19 Research Center, Institute of Laboratory Medicine, Jinling Hospital, Nanjing University School of Medicine, Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210002, China. 4. Center for Disease Control and Prevention of PLA, Beijing, 100071, China; Joint Expert Group for COVID-19, Wuhan Huoshenshan Hospital, Wuhan, Hubei, 430100, China. 5. Department of Disease Control and Prevention, the 904th Hospital, Wuxi, Jiangsu, 214000, China; Department of Laboratory Medicine & Blood Transfusion, Wuhan Huoshenshan Hospital, Wuhan, Hubei, 430100, China. 6. Medical Technical Support Division, Changzhou Medical District, the 904th Hospital, Changzhou, Jiangsu, 213003, China. 7. Center for Disease Control and Prevention of PLA, Beijing, 100071, China; Joint Expert Group for COVID-19, Wuhan Huoshenshan Hospital, Wuhan, Hubei, 430100, China. Electronic address: science2008@hotmail.com. 8. General Clinical Research Center, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210006, China. Electronic address: sk_wang@njmu.edu.cn. 9. COVID-19 Research Center, Institute of Laboratory Medicine, Jinling Hospital, Nanjing University School of Medicine, Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210002, China; Department of Laboratory Medicine & Blood Transfusion, Wuhan Huoshenshan Hospital, Wuhan, Hubei, 430100, China; Joint Expert Group for COVID-19, Wuhan Huoshenshan Hospital, Wuhan, Hubei, 430100, China. Electronic address: xiaxynju@163.com.
Dear Editor,A recent article in Journal of Infection by Fu and colleagues have summarized the clinical characteristics of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in China, and described that those with medical comorbidities tend to have more severe clinical symptoms and higher case-fatality rate, according to data of 43 studies involving 3600 patients. Of the data from China, 81% cases were mild, 14% were severe, and 5% were critical, and the case-fatality rate was 2.3% in all cases and 49.0% in critical cases. Older age and comorbidities, such as cardiovascular disease, confer a higher risk for severe disease, and young and otherwise healthy patients are also at risk for complications. ARDS (Acute respiratory distress syndrome) and respiratory failure, sepsis, acute cardiac injury and heart failure were the most common critical complications during exacerbation of COVID-19. Several laboratory outcomes indicated the severity and the clinical outcome of COVID-19patients. Previous studies reported that tumor biomarkers, such as carcino embryonic antigen (CEA), cytokeratin 19 fragment (CYFRA21-1), neuron-specific enolase (NSE), squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCCA) and Pro-Gastrin Releasing Peptide (ProGRP), were elevated in the patients with benign lung disorders, such as pneumonia and pulmonary fibrosis.
,
,
We would like to share our findings that the role of tumor markers related lung cancer in COVID-19patients as predictive indicators for clinical outcome.A total of 129 patients diagnosed as COVID-19, with 20 moderate (15.50%), 73 severe (56.59%) and 36 critical severe cases (27.91%) on admission, were included in this study. In addition, a total of 80 age-and gender- matched health individuals were enrolled as controls. The patients self-reported medical history of comorbidities were recorded on admission and were classified as hypertension, cardiovascular disease, diabetes (type 2), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and others. Of 129 cases, 114 cases (88.37%) were discharged from hospital for their recovery from COVID-19, and 15 cases (11.63%) were deceased during the treatment, shown in Supplementary Table 1. For the characteristics of patients, we observed that the mean age of patients was significantly different among the subgroup of severity, and the mean age of patients with critical severe was significant higher than those who with severe or moderate. The distribution of patients with diabetes, chronic kidney disease and others comorbidities have significant differences among the sub-groups of disease severity. Most deceased cases (14/15) were with the critical severe COVID-19 and one with severe COVID-19. Patients who deceased have significant higher ration of comorbidities of chronic kidney disease (p=0.001), shown in Table 1
.
Table 1
Clinical characteristics of the patients according to disease severity and the clinical outcomes
Clinical characteristics
Severity of Disease
P-value
Clinical outcome
P-value
Moderate
Severe
Critical severe
Discharged
Deceased
No
20
73
36
114
15
Age, Mean(SD),y
61.90(12.89)
66.59(11.49)
70.92(12.32)
0.026
66.40±12.24
72.13±11.86
0.090
Gender, n(%)
Male
11(14.10)
41(52.56)
26(33.33)
0.235
67(85.90)
11(14.10)
0.278
Female
9(17.65)
32(62.75)
10(19.61)
47(92.16)
4(7.84)
Hypertension, n(%)
Yes
5(9.09)
31(56.36)
19(34.55)
0.131
47(85.45)
8(14.55)
0.373
No
15(20.27)
42(56.76)
17(22.97)
67(90.54)
7(9.46)
Cardiovascular disease, n(%)
Yes
4(17.39)
9(39.13)
10(43.48)
0.135
19(82.61)
4(17.39)
0.341
No
16(15.09)
64(60.38)
26(24.53)
95(89.62)
11(10.38)
Diabetes, type 2, n(%)
Yes
5 (17.86)
10 (35.71)
13 (46.43)
0.026
23(82.14)
5(17.86)
0.245
No
15(14.85)
63(62.38)
23(22.77)
91(90.09)
10(9.90)
COPD, n(%)
Yes
0(0)
9(81.82)
2(18.18)
0.163
11(100)
0(0)
0.208
No
20(16.95)
64(54.24)
34(28.81)
103(87.29)
15(12.71)
Chronic kidney disease, n(%)
Yes
1(11.11)
2(22.22)
6(66.67)
0.025
5(55.56)
4(44.44)
0.001
No
19(15.83)
71(59.17)
30(25.00)
109(90.83)
11(9.17)
Others, n(%)
Yes
1(2.78)
21(58.33)
14(38.89)
0.025
30(83.33)
6(16.67)
0.267
No
19(20.43)
52(55.91)
22(23.66)
84 (90.32)
9(9.68)
Clinical outcome, n(%)
Discharge
20(17.54)
72(63.16)
22(19.30)
0.000
Die
0(0)
1(6.67)
14(93.33)
Tumor biomarkers, IQR
CEA (ng/mL)
2.39(1.20,3.82)
3.48(2.26,4.95)
5.03(3.09,8.58)
0.000
3.39(2.14,5.05)
5.43(3.55,11.42)
0.003
CYFRA21-1(ng/mL)
2.24(1.79,3.03)
3.30(2.43,4.09)
5.06(2.78,9.83)
0.000
3.14(2.35,4.05)
9.72(7.32,12.08)
0.000
NSE (ng/mL)
12.76(11.85,15.11)
13.01(10.67,16.28)
12.56(10.74,18.28)
0.970
12.40(10.86, 15.34)
15.92(12.77,28.41)
0.022
SCC (ng/mL)
0.99(0.64,1.68)
1.03(0.73,1.39)
2.62(1.18,4.10)
0.000
1.07(0.75,1.59)
3.59(2.75,8.77)
0.000
proGRP(pg/mL)
42.13(36.56,46.41)
44.06(35.67,57.15)
56.27(32.55,88.89)
0.219
44.61(36.38,61.35)
34.60 (16.57,102.55)
0.476
Clinical characteristics of the patients according to disease severity and the clinical outcomesThe plasma concentration of all the five biomarkers were significantly elevated in cases than those in controls (pall<0.01). In addition, the significant differences of plasma level of CEA, CYFRA21-1 and SCCA were observed among the subgroups of severity of disease and clinical outcome (Table 1) and plasma level of CEA, CYFRA21-1, SCCA were significantly increased with the advance serverity of disease. Whereas, there were no significant differences of NSE and proGRP contration amonge the different severity subgroups, shown in Supplementary Figure 1.To further analyze prognostic role of tumor biomarker in COVID-19patients, a logistic regression was applied to measure the associations of tumor biomarkers level to risk of death. Crude OR, OR adjusted for age and gender (model 1), and OR adjusted for molel1 plus comordities (model 2) were used to assess the relative risk, respectively. The results revealed that increased level of CEA (OR=1.13, 95%CI:1.03-1.23, p=0.010; adjust model 1 OR=1.12, 95%CI: 1.02-1.23, p=0.016; adjust model 2 OR=1.12, 95%CI: 1.01-1.26, p=0.029), CYFRA21-1 (OR=1.73, 95%CI:1.35-2.21, p=0.000; adjust model 1 OR=1.673, 95%CI: 1.34-2.36, p=0.000; adjust model 2 OR=1.73, 95%CI: 1.32-2.28, p=0.000), NSE (OR=1.09, 95%CI: 1.02-1.17, p=0.016; adjust model 1 OR=1.11, 95%CI: 1.04-1.19, p=0.003; adjust model 2 OR=1.15, 95%CI: 1.05-1.27, p=0.004) and SCCA (OR=1.28, 95%CI: 1.11-1.48, p=0.016; adjust model 1 OR=1.22, 95%CI: 1.06-1.41, p= 0.007; adjust model 2 OR=1.24, 95%CI: 1.07-1.45, p= 0.006) were associated with increased risk of death, respectively, shown in Table 2
.
Table 2
The relative risk of tumor biomarkers to death
Patients
CEA
CYFRA21-1
NSE
SCCA
proGRP
OR(95%CI)
P value
OR(95%CI)
P value
OR(95%CI)
P value
OR(95%CI)
P value
OR(95%CI)
P value
Discharged
reference
reference
reference
reference
reference
Deceased
1.13(1.03,1.23)
0.010
1.73(1.35,2.21)
0.000
1.09(1.02,1.17)
0.016
1.28(1.11,1.48)
0.001
1.01(0.99,1.02)
0.417
Model1
1.12(1.02,1.23)
0.016
1.73(1.34,2.36)
0.000
1.11(1.04,1.19)
0.003
1.27(1.09,1.48)
0.002
1.00(0.99,1.02)
0.832
Model2
1.12(1.01,1.26)
0.029
1.73(1.32,2.28)
0.000
1.15(1.05,1.27)
0.004
1.24(1.07,1.45)
0.006
1.00(0.98,1.01)
0.601
Model1, adjusted for age and gender; Model2, adjusted for model1 plus comorbidities.
The relative risk of tumor biomarkers to deathModel1, adjusted for age and gender; Model2, adjusted for model1 plus comorbidities.The ROC curve revealed that SCCA (AUC: 0.937, p=0.000, cut-off: 2.57 ng/ml), CYFRA21-1(AUC: 0.882, p=0.000, cut-off: 7.29 ng/ml) and CEA (AUC: 0.737, p=0.003, cut-off: 8.55 ng/ml) could predicte the clinical outcome of COVID-19patients, shown in Figure 2. The correlation of biomarkers dynamics and patient outcome was also evaluated with 22 discharged and 11 deceased patients, and the result revealed that the increased concentration of CYFRA21-1, SCCA and NSE were the risk of death (Supplementary Table 2), indicating that dynamic monitor for the three biomarkers could predict the clinical outcome of COVID-19patients.This study revealed that age, diabetes, chronic kidney disease and other diseases were associated with the severity of COVID-19patients. In which, chronic kidney disease was also regarded as a risk of death of COVID-19patients, which was consistent the result of publised data. Acutally, the most common cause of death in COVID-19patients is viral pneumonia leading to inflammatory response results in the progression to multi-organ failure. Therefore, those patients have history of diabetes, chronic kidney disease were more susceptiable to develop multi-organ failure and lead to death. Tumor biomarkers related lung cancer that CEA, CYFRA21-1, NSE, SCCA, ProGRP were previously reported to be elevated in the pneumoniapatients or benign lung diseases.
,
In this study, we observed that all five tumor biomarkers were significantly increased in the plasma of COVID-19patients than those in health controls, that CEA, CYFRA21-1 and SCCA were significantly different among the subgroups of severity of disease and clinical outcome, and that CEA, CYFRA21-1, SCCA could predicte the clinical outcome of COVID-19patients. This study firstly reported the role of tumor biomarkers in COVID-19patients.In short, we concluded that the concentrations of tumor biomarkers of CEA, CYFRA21-1, NSE, SCCA, ProGRP were elevated in COVID-19patients, and that CEA, CYFRA21-1, SCCA could predicte the clinical outcome of COVID-19patients.