Literature DB >> 32504659

Assessment of RBE-Weighted Dose Models for Carbon Ion Therapy Toward Modernization of Clinical Practice at HIT: In Vitro, in Vivo, and in Patients.

Stewart Mein1, Carmen Klein2, Benedikt Kopp1, Giuseppe Magro3, Semi Harrabi4, Christian P Karger5, Thomas Haberer6, Jürgen Debus7, Amir Abdollahi8, Ivana Dokic9, Andrea Mairani10.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Present-day treatment planning in carbon ion therapy is conducted with assumptions for a limited number of tissue types and models for effective dose. Here, we comprehensively assess relative biological effectiveness (RBE) in carbon ion therapy and associated models toward the modernization of current clinical practice in effective dose calculation.
METHODS: Using 2 human (A549, H460) and 2 mouse (B16, Renca) tumor cell lines, clonogenic cell survival assay was performed for examination of changes in RBE along the full range of clinical-like spread-out Bragg peak (SOBP) fields. Prediction power of the local effect model (LEM1 and LEM4) and the modified microdosimetric kinetic model (mMKM) was assessed. Experimentation and analysis were carried out in the frame of a multidimensional end point study for clinically relevant ranges of physical dose (D), dose-averaged linear energy transfer (LETd), and base-line photon radio-sensitivity (α/β)x. Additionally, predictions were compared against previously reported RBE measurements in vivo and surveyed in patient cases.
RESULTS: RBE model prediction performance varied among the investigated perspectives, with mMKM prediction exhibiting superior agreement with measurements both in vitro and in vivo across the 3 investigated end points. LEM1 and LEM4 performed their best in the highest LET conditions but yielded overestimations and underestimations in low/midrange LET conditions, respectively, as demonstrated by comparison with measurements. Additionally, the analysis of patient treatment plans revealed substantial variability across the investigated models (±20%-30% uncertainty), largely dependent on the selected model and absolute values for input tissue parameters αx and βx.
CONCLUSION: RBE dependencies in vitro, in vivo, and in silico were investigated with respect to various clinically relevant end points in the context of tumor-specific tissue radio-sensitivity assignment and accurate RBE modeling. Discovered model trends and performances advocate upgrading current treatment planning schemes in carbon ion therapy and call for verification via clinical outcome analysis with large patient cohorts.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32504659     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.05.041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  7 in total

1.  Proton and carbon ion therapy for skull base chordomas.

Authors:  Daniel M Trifiletti; Paul D Brown
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2020-09-29       Impact factor: 12.300

Review 2.  Applications of nanodosimetry in particle therapy planning and beyond.

Authors:  Antoni Rucinski; Anna Biernacka; Reinhard Schulte
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2021-12-10       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Ways to unravel the clinical potential of carbon ions for head and neck cancer reirradiation: dosimetric comparison and local failure pattern analysis as part of the prospective randomized CARE trial.

Authors:  Thomas Held; Thomas Tessonnier; Henrik Franke; Sebastian Regnery; Lukas Bauer; Katharina Weusthof; Semi Harrabi; Klaus Herfarth; Andrea Mairani; Jürgen Debus; Sebastian Adeberg
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 4.309

Review 4.  Carbon Ion Radiobiology.

Authors:  Walter Tinganelli; Marco Durante
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2020-10-17       Impact factor: 6.575

5.  Spot-Scanning Hadron Arc (SHArc) Therapy: A Study With Light and Heavy Ions.

Authors:  Stewart Mein; Thomas Tessonnier; Benedikt Kopp; Semi Harrabi; Amir Abdollahi; Jürgen Debus; Thomas Haberer; Andrea Mairani
Journal:  Adv Radiat Oncol       Date:  2021-02-04

6.  Technical note: Impact of beamline-specific particle energy spectra on clinical plans in carbon ion beam therapy.

Authors:  Andreas Franz Resch; Mansure Schafasand; Niklas Lackner; Tom Niessen; Staffan Beck; Alessio Elia; David Boersma; Loïc Grevillot; Piero Fossati; Lars Glimelius; Markus Stock; Dietmar Georg; Antonio Carlino
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2022-04-27       Impact factor: 4.506

7.  Carbon ion reirradiation compared to intensity-modulated re-radiotherapy for recurrent head and neck cancer (CARE): a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Thomas Held; Kristin Lang; Sebastian Regnery; Katharina Weusthof; Adriane Hommertgen; Cornelia Jäkel; Eric Tonndorf-Martini; Johannes Krisam; Peter Plinkert; Karim Zaoui; Christian Freudlsperger; Julius Moratin; Jürgen Krauss; Semi B Harrabi; Klaus Herfarth; Jürgen Debus; Sebastian Adeberg
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-08-05       Impact factor: 3.481

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.