Literature DB >> 32504255

The Effect of Timing of Intracranial Pressure Monitor Placement in Patients with Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.

Haydn Hoffman1, Katherine M Bunch2, Matthew Protas2, Lawrence S Chin2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/
OBJECTIVE: Intracranial pressure (ICP) monitor placement is indicated for patients with severe traumatic brain injury (sTBI) to minimize secondary brain injury. There is little evidence to guide the optimal timing of ICP monitor placement.
METHODS: A retrospective cohort study using the National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB) from 2013 to 2017 was performed. The NTDB was queried to identify patients with sTBI who underwent external ventricular drain or intraparenchymal ICP monitor placement. Propensity score matching was used to create matched pairs of patients who underwent early compared to late ICP monitor placement using 6-h and 12-h cutoffs. The outcomes of interest were in-hospital mortality, non-routine discharge disposition, total length of stay (LOS), intensive care unit (ICU) LOS, and number of days mechanically ventilated.
RESULTS: A total of 5057 patients with sTBI were included in the study. In-hospital mortality for patients with early compared to late ICP monitor placement was 33.6% and 30.4%, respectively (p = 0.049). The incidence of non-routine disposition was 92.6% in the within 6 h group and 94.4% in the late placement group (p = 0.037). Hospital LOS, ICU LOS, and number of days mechanically ventilated were significantly greater in the late ICP monitoring group. Similar results were seen when using a 12-h cutoff for late ICP monitor placement. In the Cox proportional hazards model, craniotomy (HR 1.097, 95% CI 1.037-1.160) and isolated intracranial injury (HR 1.128, 95% CI 1.055-1.207) were associated with early ICP monitor placement. Hypotension was negatively associated with early ICP monitor placement (HR 0.801, 95% CI 0.725-0.884).
CONCLUSION: Despite a statistically marginal association between mortality and early ICP monitor placement, most outcomes were superior when ICP monitors were placed within 6 or 12 h of arrival. This may be due to earlier identification and treatment of intracranial hypertension.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Brain injuries; Intracranial pressure; Neurosurgery; Traumatic

Year:  2021        PMID: 32504255     DOI: 10.1007/s12028-020-01002-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurocrit Care        ISSN: 1541-6933            Impact factor:   3.210


  4 in total

1.  The Trauma Quality Improvement Program: pilot study and initial demonstration of feasibility.

Authors:  Mark R Hemmila; Avery B Nathens; Shahid Shafi; J Forrest Calland; David E Clark; H Gill Cryer; Sandra Goble; Christopher J Hoeft; J Wayne Meredith; Melanie L Neal; Michael D Pasquale; Michelle D Pomphrey; John J Fildes
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2010-02

2.  [Intracranial pressure in severe brain injuries. 2nd Part: Therapeutic interests and prognosis].

Authors:  J D Born; P Hans; J Bonnal
Journal:  Neurochirurgie       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 1.553

3.  Intracranial pressure monitoring in brain-injured patients is associated with worsening of survival.

Authors:  Shahid Shafi; Ramon Diaz-Arrastia; Christopher Madden; Larry Gentilello
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2008-02

4.  Timing and duration of intracranial hypertension versus outcomes after severe traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  M Majdan; W Mauritz; I Wilbacher; A Brazinova; M Rusnak; J Leitgeb
Journal:  Minerva Anestesiol       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 3.051

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.