| Literature DB >> 32503809 |
Kengo Furuichi1, Miho Shimizu2, Masayuki Yamanouchi3, Junichi Hoshino3, Norihiko Sakai2, Yasunori Iwata2, Tadashi Toyama2, Shinji Kitajima2, Akinori Hara2, Yukio Yuzawa4, Hiroshi Kitamura5, Yoshiki Suzuki6, Hiroshi Sato7, Noriko Uesugi8, Yoshihiko Ueda9, Shinichi Nishi10, Tomoya Nishino11, Kenichi Samejima12, Kentaro Kohagura13, Yugo Shibagaki14, Hirofumi Makino15, Seiichi Matsuo16, Yoshifumi Ubara3, Hitoshi Yokoyama17, Takashi Wada2.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The speed of declining kidney function differs among patients with diabetic nephropathy. This study was undertaken to clarify clinical and pathological features that affect the speed of declining kidney function in patients with diabetic nephropathy. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This study was design as multicenter retrospective study. The subjects (377 patients with diabetic nephropathy diagnosed by kidney biopsy at 13 centers in Japan) were classified into three groups based on the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) declining speed. The eGFR increasing group, the control group, and the eGFR declining group were divided at 0 and 5 mL/min/1.73 m2/year, respectively. Characteristics of clinicopathological findings of declining kidney function were evaluated.Entities:
Keywords: kidney biopsies; kidney failure; nephropathology; nephropathy
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32503809 PMCID: PMC7282298 DOI: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2019-001157
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care ISSN: 2052-4897
Baseline clinical characteristics stratified by eGFR declining speed
| Increasing | Control | Decreasing | Total | Inc vs Cont | Dec vs Cont | |||||||||
| Median | 25 | 75 | Median | 25 | 75 | Median | 25 | 75 | Median | 25 | 75 | P value | P value | |
| Age (years old) | 56 | 47 | 63 | 60 | 53 | 66 | 60 | 50 | 67 | 59 | 51 | 66 | <0.05 | |
| Gender (male) | 69.7% | 72.8% | 71.7% | 71.6% | ||||||||||
| BMI | 22.7 | 20.8 | 25.4 | 23.4 | 21.6 | 25.8 | 23.0 | 21.2 | 25.5 | 23.0 | 21.2 | 25.6 | ||
| SysBP (mm Hg) | 134 | 123 | 146 | 140 | 130 | 155 | 148 | 138 | 162 | 142 | 132 | 160 | <0.05 | <0.01 |
| DiaBP (mm Hg) | 73 | 70 | 84 | 80 | 70 | 87 | 80 | 72 | 90 | 80 | 70 | 88 | ||
| Hb (g/dL) | 13.4 | 11.9 | 15.2 | 12.8 | 11.3 | 14.4 | 11.6 | 10.0 | 13.2 | 12.2 | 10.5 | 13.9 | <0.01 | |
| eGFR | 53.9 | 38.8 | 70.6 | 50.2 | 31.7 | 65.5 | 47.3 | 35.0 | 66.0 | 49.1 | 35.0 | 66.4 | ||
| UA (mg/dL) | 6.0 | 5.2 | 7.4 | 6.7 | 5.8 | 7.5 | 6.5 | 5.7 | 7.6 | 6.5 | 5.6 | 7.6 | ||
| TP (g/dL) | 7.0 | 6.5 | 7.7 | 6.8 | 6.1 | 7.1 | 6.0 | 5.4 | 6.8 | 6.3 | 5.6 | 7.0 | <0.01 | |
| Alb (g/dL) | 3.8 | 3.4 | 4.3 | 3.6 | 2.9 | 4.0 | 3.0 | 2.5 | 3.5 | 3.2 | 2.6 | 3.7 | <0.01 | |
| HbA1c (%) | 7.6 | 6.5 | 8.8 | 7.2 | 6.4 | 8.5 | 7.0 | 6.0 | 8.9 | 7.2 | 6.2 | 8.8 | ||
| Tcho (mg/dL) | 193 | 159 | 226 | 194 | 165 | 229 | 211 | 179 | 256 | 206 | 175 | 244 | <0.01 | |
| LDL (mg/dL) | 120 | 102 | 173 | 135 | 106 | 168 | 133 | 102 | 160 | 132 | 102 | 162 | ||
| TG (mg/dL) | 156 | 103 | 219 | 158 | 107 | 195 | 153 | 114 | 210 | 154 | 110 | 207 | ||
| Ualb (g/day) | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.9 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 1.3 | 2.0 | 0.9 | 3.4 | 1.2 | 0.5 | 2.6 | <0.05 | <0.01 |
| UOB | 14.5% | 20.7% | 42.0% | 32.7% | ||||||||||
| ACEI | 25.0% | 32.5% | 33.6% | 32.3% | ||||||||||
| ARB | 21.4% | 55.0% | 53.7% | 49.8% | <0.01 | |||||||||
| RAS | 46.4% | 87.5% | 87.2% | 82.0% | <0.05 | |||||||||
| CCB | 50.0% | 60.0% | 49.7% | 51.6% | ||||||||||
| Lipid | 17.9% | 20.0% | 28.2% | 25.3% | ||||||||||
Data are median (25th, 75th percentile) or percentage unless otherwise indicated.
ACEI, ACE inhibitor; Alb, albumin; ARB, angiotensin II receptor blocker; BMI, body mass index; CCB, calcium channel blocker; Cont, control group; Dec, eGFR declining group; DiaBP, diastolic blood pressure; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; Hb, hemoglobin; Inc, eGFR increasing group; LDL, low-density-lipoprotein cholesterol; lipid, lipid-lowering agent; RAS, renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system blocker; SysBP, systolic blood pressure; Tcho, total cholesterol; TG, triglyceride; TP, total protein; UA, uric acid; UAlb, urinary albumin; UOB, urinary occult blood.
Figure 1Crude and adjusted HR for composite kidney event, kidney death, and all-cause death, among three groups by eGFR declining speed. Cox analysis indicated that eGFR increasing group and eGFR declining group were statistically significantly high and low risk for composite kidney event even after adjusted by age, gender, urinary albuminuria, Hb, and systolic pressure, respectively (control group is reference). Similarly, eGFR declining group was statistically significantly high risk for all-cause death even after adjusted by age, gender, urinary albuminuria, Hb, and systolic pressure. eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; Hb, hemoglobin; ND, not determined; SysBP, systolic blood pressure; Ualb, urinary levels of albumin.
Figure 2Survival curves for composite kidney end points stratified by three groups as derived from the Kaplan-Meier method with log-rank test. Event-free curves of composite kidney end points are shown. Differences between two groups were compared by a log-rank test.
Figure 3Crude and adjusted HR for kidney death. Crude and adjusted HR for kidney death were determined for various pathological clinical characteristics (indicated in the figure) by the Cox analysis. A plot of the HR for each variable is shown; open circles indicate the HR in univariate analysis, and solid circles indicate the HR in multivariable analysis with age, gender, urinary levels of albumin, and hemoglobin; 95% CI shown as whiskers. HRs were calculated for a one score increase in each pathological finding; 10% increase in global glomerulosclerosis; 1 g/day increase in urinary levels of albumin; 1 g/dL increase in Hb. Athero, intimal thickening; Diff, diffuse lesion; Double, subendothelial space widening (or duplication of basement membrane); Exda, exudative lesion; GScle, global glomerulosclerosis, collapsing glomerulopathy, and ischemic nephropathy; Hb, hemoglobin; ICell, interstitial cell infiltration; IFTA, interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy; MesL mesangiolysis/microaneurysm; Nodu, nodular lesion; UAlb, urinary levels of albumin.
Baseline pathological characteristics stratified by eGFR declining speed
| Increasing | Control | Decreasing | Total | Inc | Dec vs Cont | |||||||||||||
| Mean | Median | 25 | 75 | Mean | Median | 25 | 75 | Mean | Median | 25 | 75 | Mean | Median | 25 | 75 | P value | P value | |
| Diff | 1.72 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2.11 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 2.32 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 2.17 | 2 | 1 | 3 | ||
| Nodu | 0.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.30 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.53 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.43 | 0 | 0 | 1 | ||
| Double | 0.43 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.89 | 1 | 0 | 1.5 | 1.21 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1.00 | 1 | 0 | 2 | <0.05 | |
| Exda | 0.28 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.37 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.58 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.48 | 0 | 0 | 1 | ||
| MesL | 0.16 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.25 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.48 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.38 | 0 | 0 | 1 | ||
| Pola | 0.52 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.78 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0.79 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0.74 | 1 | 0 | 1 | ||
| GScle | 16.80 | 10.0 | 0 | 29.6 | 24.58 | 20.0 | 6.6 | 34.4 | 27.28 | 24.0 | 10.0 | 40.0 | 24.85 | 20.0 | 6.3 | 39.0 | <0.05 | |
| SScle | 1.79 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2.90 | 0 | 0 | 3.3 | 3.80 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 5.6 | 3.26 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 4.3 | ||
| GMega | 0.30 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.38 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.45 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.41 | 0 | 0 | 1 | ||
| IFTA | 1.27 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1.65 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2.03 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 1.82 | 2 | 1 | 3 | ||
| ICell | 0.92 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1.27 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1.31 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1.23 | 1 | 1 | 2 | <0.05 | |
| Hyali | 1.91 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 2.30 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 2.27 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2.21 | 3 | 1 | 3 | ||
| Athero | 1.00 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1.22 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1.31 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1.24 | 1 | 1 | 2 | ||
Data are mean and median (25th, 75th percentile) of pathological score or %.
Baseline pathological characteristics stratified by eGFR declining speed were shown. After propensity score matching with urinary albumin, Hb, and systolic blood pressure, three pathological findings (subendothelial space widening, global glomerulosclerosis, and interstitial cell infiltration) have a lower score in eGFR increasing group than control group. There was no statistical significance in any pathological financing between control and declining group.
Athero, intimal thickening; Cont, control group; Dec, eGFR declining group; Diff, diffuse lesion; Double, subendothelial space widening (or duplication of basement membrane); eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; Exda, exudative lesion; GMega, glomerulomegaly; GScle, global glomerulosclerosis, collapsing glomerulopathy, and ischemic nephropathy; Hyali, arteriolar hyalinosis; ICell, interstitial cell infiltration; IFTA, interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy; Inc, eGFR increasing group; MesL, mesangiolysis/microaneurysm; Nodu, nodular lesion; Pola, perihilar neovascularization (polar vasculosis); SScle, segmental sclerosis.
Figure 4OR to the risk for inclusion in the eGFR decreasing group compared with control group (A) and OR to the risk for inclusion in the eGFR increasing group compared with control group (B). ORs to the risk for inclusion in the eGFR decline group or eGFR increasing group were determined for various pathological and clinical characteristics (indicated in the figure) by the logistic model. A plot of the OR for each variable is shown; open circles indicate the OR in univariate logistic regression, and solid circles indicate the OR in multivariable logistic regression; 95% CI shown as whiskers. ORs were calculated for a one score increase in each pathological finding; 10% increase in global glomerulosclerosis; 1 g/day increase in urinary levels of albumin; 1 g/dL increase in Hb; 10 mm Hg increase in systolic blood pressure. Diff, diffuse lesion; Double, subendothelial space widening (or duplication of basement membrane); eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; Exda, exudative lesion; GScle, global glomerulosclerosis, collapsing glomerulopathy, and ischemic nephropathy; Hb, hemoglobin; Hyali, arteriolar hyalinosis; ICell, interstitial cell infiltration; IFTA, interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy; MesL, mesangiolysis/microaneurysm; Nodu, nodular lesion; Pola, perihilar neovascularization (polar vasculosis); SysBP, systolic blood pressure; uAlb, urinary levels of albumin.