Literature DB >> 32502877

TAVR for low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis: Prognostic impact of aortic valve calcification.

Sebastian Ludwig1, Alina Goßling1, Lara Waldschmidt1, Matthias Linder1, Oliver D Bhadra2, Lisa Voigtländer1, Andreas Schäfer2, Florian Deuschl1, Johannes Schirmer2, Hermann Reichenspurner2, Stefan Blankenberg1, Ulrich Schäfer3, Dirk Westermann1, Moritz Seiffert1, Lenard Conradi2, Niklas Schofer4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Compared to high gradient aortic stenosis (AS), patients with low-flow, low-gradient AS have higher mortality after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), but distinct outcome predictors in this patient subset are yet to be determined. The present study investigated the prognostic impact of aortic valve calcification (AVC) in patients with low-flow, low-gradient AS undergoing TAVR.
METHODS: This retrospective single-center analysis includes all patients undergoing TAVR for severe low-flow, low-gradient AS (n = 526), ie, low EF low gradient AS (LEF-LG AS; n = 290) and paradoxical low-flow, low-gradient AS (PLF-LG AS; n = 236), in whom AVC was quantified from contrast-enhanced multislice computed tomography images. AVCdensity was defined as calcium volume per annulus area. Patients were trichotomized according to sex-specific AVCdensity tertiles in both subgroups. All-cause mortality was assessed by Kaplan-Meier analyses and independent outcome predictors were determined by multivariable analyses.
RESULTS: In both subgroups, patients with high AVCdensity had higher mean transvalvular gradients at baseline and higher rates of PVL after TAVR. High AVCdensity was associated with lowest 1- and 3-year mortality after TAVR in the LEF-LG AS but not in the PLF-LG AS group. According to multivariable analysis AVCdensity was independently associated with better survival in LEF-LG AS patients (HR 0.73 [0.60-0.88], P = .0011), but not in those with PLF-LG AS (HR 0.91 [0.73-1.14], P = .42).
CONCLUSIONS: Quantification of AVC may not only be of diagnostic but also of prognostic value, as it facilitates the selection of LEF-LG AS patients with higher probability of beneficial outcome after TAVR.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32502877     DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2020.03.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Heart J        ISSN: 0002-8703            Impact factor:   4.749


  3 in total

1.  Risk prediction in patients with low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis and reduced ejection fraction undergoing TAVI.

Authors:  Sebastian Ludwig; Alina Goßling; Moritz Seiffert; Dirk Westermann; Jan-Malte Sinning; Atsushi Sugiura; Matti Adam; Victor Mauri; Derk Frank; Hatim Seoudy; Tanja Rudolph; Max Potratz; Lenard Conradi; Niklas Schofer
Journal:  Open Heart       Date:  2022-01

2.  Artificial Intelligence Enabled Fully Automated CMR Function Quantification for Optimized Risk Stratification in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

Authors:  Ruben Evertz; Torben Lange; Sören J Backhaus; Alexander Schulz; Bo Eric Beuthner; Rodi Topci; Karl Toischer; Miriam Puls; Johannes T Kowallick; Gerd Hasenfuß; Andreas Schuster
Journal:  J Interv Cardiol       Date:  2022-04-20       Impact factor: 1.776

3.  Aortic valve calcium volume as measured by native versus contrast-enhanced computer tomography and the implications for the diagnosis of severe aortic stenosis in TAVR patients with low-gradient aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Mohammad El Garhy; Tamer Owais; Philipp Lauten
Journal:  Egypt Heart J       Date:  2022-09-30
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.