Literature DB >> 32502210

Dopamine neurons do not constitute an obligatory stage in the final common path for the evaluation and pursuit of brain stimulation reward.

Ivan Trujillo-Pisanty1, Kent Conover1, Pavel Solis1, Daniel Palacios1, Peter Shizgal1.   

Abstract

The neurobiological study of reward was launched by the discovery of intracranial self-stimulation (ICSS). Subsequent investigation of this phenomenon provided the initial link between reward-seeking behavior and dopaminergic neurotransmission. We re-evaluated this relationship by psychophysical, pharmacological, optogenetic, and computational means. In rats working for direct, optical activation of midbrain dopamine neurons, we varied the strength and opportunity cost of the stimulation and measured time allocation, the proportion of trial time devoted to reward pursuit. We found that the dependence of time allocation on the strength and cost of stimulation was similar formally to that observed when electrical stimulation of the medial forebrain bundle served as the reward. When the stimulation is strong and cheap, the rats devote almost all their time to reward pursuit; time allocation falls off as stimulation strength is decreased and/or its opportunity cost is increased. A 3D plot of time allocation versus stimulation strength and cost produces a surface resembling the corner of a plateau (the "reward mountain"). We show that dopamine-transporter blockade shifts the mountain along both the strength and cost axes in rats working for optical activation of midbrain dopamine neurons. In contrast, the same drug shifted the mountain uniquely along the opportunity-cost axis when rats worked for electrical MFB stimulation in a prior study. Dopamine neurons are an obligatory stage in the dominant model of ICSS, which positions them at a key nexus in the final common path for reward seeking. This model fails to provide a cogent account for the differential effect of dopamine transporter blockade on the reward mountain. Instead, we propose that midbrain dopamine neurons and neurons with non-dopaminergic, MFB axons constitute parallel limbs of brain-reward circuitry that ultimately converge on the final-common path for the evaluation and pursuit of rewards.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32502210     DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0226722

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  5 in total

1.  Editorial: Neurobehavioral Mechanisms of Reward: Theoretical and Technical Perspectives and Their Implications for Psychopathology.

Authors:  George Panagis; Styliani Vlachou; Alejandro Higuera-Matas; Maria J Simon
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2022-07-05       Impact factor: 3.617

2.  Introducing the PLOS ONE Collection on the neuroscience of reward and decision making.

Authors:  Stephanie M Groman; Satoshi Ikemoto; Matthew Rushworth; Jane R Taylor; Robert Whelan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-10-08       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  On the Similarity Between the Reinforcing and the Discriminative Properties of Intracranial Self-Stimulation.

Authors:  David N Velazquez-Martinez; Benita Lizeth Pacheco-Gomez; Ana Laura Toscano-Zapien; Maria Almudena Lopez-Guzman; Daniel Velazquez-Lopez
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2022-02-21       Impact factor: 3.558

4.  The Convergence Model of Brain Reward Circuitry: Implications for Relief of Treatment-Resistant Depression by Deep-Brain Stimulation of the Medial Forebrain Bundle.

Authors:  Vasilios Pallikaras; Peter Shizgal
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 3.617

5.  Dopamine and Beyond: Implications of Psychophysical Studies of Intracranial Self-Stimulation for the Treatment of Depression.

Authors:  Vasilios Pallikaras; Peter Shizgal
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2022-08-08
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.