Literature DB >> 32501935

Pain After Cochlear Implantation Without Signs of Inflammation: A Systematic Review.

Mantegh Sethi1, Amy Hammond-Kenny1, Ananth Vijendren1, Daniele Borsetto1, Eleanor J Barker2, James R Tysome1, Neil Donnelly1, Patrick Axon1, Manohar Bance1,3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This review summarizes current evidence on causes and management strategies for delayed pain post-cochlear implantation (CI) surgery, without clinical evidence of inflammation or infection.
METHODS: The systematic review was undertaken in line with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic review and Meta-Analysis Protocols 2015 guidelines. A literature search was undertaken, with inclusion of patients who underwent CI and presented with delayed pain (>3 months post-operatively) around their device site without an identifiable cause. Analysis was undertaken using MATLAB (MathWorks, Natick, MA) and the R-software package (www.r-project.org).
RESULTS: 4 articles (48 patients), all retrospective case series, met inclusion criteria. The mean onset of pain post-CI was 60 months and mean follow-up was 15.8 months, there was no difference in the prevalence of pain between device brands (p=0.13). The majority (90%) did not have any hearing deterioration, and investigations did not reveal a cause for the pain in any of the patients. In terms of management, medical therapies, including oral therapy (analgesia, non-steroidal anti-inflammatories, antibiotics) and local treatments (topical, injections) resolved pain in 41% and 63%, respectively. Surgical intervention (explantation, magnet replacement, tympanic neurectomy), where undertaken, resolved pain in 100%. A minority had an identifiable infective microorganism cultured from intra-operative soft tissue or biofilm samples.
CONCLUSIONS: Evidence for the causes and management of delayed pain post-CI without clinical evidence of inflammation is scarce. A stepwise approach is deemed best, with decisions being made on an individual basis, evaluating each patient's specific circumstances and priorities. Further evaluation of explanted devices would allow for better understanding of the causes and treatment of this group of patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32501935     DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000002696

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otol Neurotol        ISSN: 1531-7129            Impact factor:   2.311


  2 in total

1.  Multimodal Analysis of the Tissue Response to a Bone-Anchored Hearing Implant: Presentation of a Two-Year Case Report of a Patient With Recurrent Pain, Inflammation, and Infection, Including a Systematic Literature Review.

Authors:  Martin L Johansson; Tim G A Calon; Omar Omar; Furqan A Shah; Margarita Trobos; Peter Thomsen; Robert J Stokroos; Anders Palmquist
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2021-03-30       Impact factor: 5.293

2.  Hearing Improvement After Pain Related to Cochlear Implant Explantation: A Case Report.

Authors:  Isra Aljazeeri; Maha Alrajhi; Abdulrahman Hagr
Journal:  J Int Adv Otol       Date:  2022-07       Impact factor: 1.316

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.