Literature DB >> 32501766

A review of the PERFORMS scheme in breast screening.

Alastair Gale1, Yan Chen2.   

Abstract

This review details the aetiology of the PERFORMS self-assessment scheme in breast screening, together with its subsequent development, current implementation and future function. The purpose of the scheme is examined and the importance of its continuing role in a changing screening service described, together with current evolution.

Mesh：

Year:  2020        PMID： 32501766      PMCID： PMC7446009          DOI： 10.1259/bjr.20190908

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN： 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  17 in total

1.  Improving the accuracy of mammography: volume and outcome relationships.

Authors:  Laura Esserman; Helen Cowley; Carey Eberle; Alastair Kirkpatrick; Sophia Chang; Kevin Berbaum; Alastair Gale
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2002-03-06       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  On the scientific evaluation of diagnostic procedures.

Authors:  L H GARLAND
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1949-03       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Quantification of the UK 5-point breast imaging classification and mapping to BI-RADS to facilitate comparison with international literature.

Authors:  K Taylor; P Britton; S O'Keeffe; M G Wallis
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Mammography and screening for breast cancer.

Authors:  E J Roebuck
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1986-01-25

5.  The statistical assessment of the variability in observer perception and description of roentgenographic pulmonary shadows.

Authors:  J Yerushalmy
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  1969-12       Impact factor: 2.303

6.  Computer aids to mammographic diagnosis.

Authors:  A G Gale; E J Roebuck; P Riley; B S Worthington
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  Computer-aided detection in the United Kingdom National Breast Screening Programme: prospective study.

Authors:  Lisanne A L Khoo; Paul Taylor; Rosalind M Given-Wilson
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Extending the age range for breast screening in England: pilot study to assess the feasibility and acceptability of randomization.

Authors:  Kath Moser; Sarah Sellars; Margot Wheaton; Julie Cooke; Alison Duncan; Anthony Maxwell; Michael Michell; Mary Wilson; Valerie Beral; Richard Peto; Mike Richards; Julietta Patnick
Journal:  J Med Screen       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.136

Review 9.  Mammographic breast density as an intermediate phenotype for breast cancer.

Authors:  Norman F Boyd; Johanna M Rommens; Kelly Vogt; Vivian Lee; John L Hopper; Martin J Yaffe; Andrew D Paterson
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 41.316

10.  Single reading with computer-aided detection for screening mammography.

Authors:  Fiona J Gilbert; Susan M Astley; Maureen G C Gillan; Olorunsola F Agbaje; Matthew G Wallis; Jonathan James; Caroline R M Boggis; Stephen W Duffy
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-10-01       Impact factor: 91.245
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.