Literature DB >> 32501654

Favourable multi-institutional experience with penoscrotal decompression for prolonged ischaemic priapism.

Adam S Baumgarten1, Maia E VanDyke1, Yooni A Yi1, Christopher G Keith1, Joceline S Fuchs1, Nicolas M Ortiz1, Billy H Cordon2, Travis J Pagliara3, Ellen E Ward1, John W Jaderlund4, Charles S Teeple5, Brian S Christine6, Faysal A Yafi7, Steven J Hudak1, Allen F Morey1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To report our multi-institutional experience using penoscrotal decompression (PSD) for the surgical treatment of prolonged ischaemic priapism (PIP).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed clinical records for patients with PIP treated with PSD between 2017 and 2020. Priapisms were confirmed as ischaemic based on clinical presentations and cavernosal blood gas abnormalities. Treatment with irrigation and injection of α-agonists in all patients had failed prior to PSD. Patient characteristics, peri-operative variables and outcomes, and changes in International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) scores were evaluated.
RESULTS: We analysed 25 patients who underwent a total of 27 PSD procedures. The mean duration of priapism at initial presentation was 71.0 h. Irrigations and injections in all patients had failed, while corporoglanular shunt treatment in 48.0% of patients (12/25) had also failed prior to PSD. Of the 10 patients who underwent unilateral PSD, two (20.0%) had priapism recurrence. Both were treated with bilateral PSD, with prompt and lasting detumescence. Among the 15 patients undergoing primary bilateral PSD, none had priapism recurrence. Of the 15 patients with documented sexual function status at last follow-up, nine (60%) reported spontaneous erectile function adequate for penetration, while six (40%) reported erectile dysfunction. The median (interquartile range) decrease in IIEF-5 score was 3.5 (0-6.75) points after PSD. Two patients underwent uneventful inflatable penile prosthesis placement following PSD.
CONCLUSIONS: Penoscrotal decompression presents a simple, safe, highly effective and easily reproducible procedure for resolution of PIP. PSD should be considered as a viable salvage or alternative strategy to corporoglanular shunt procedures.
© 2020 The Authors BJU International © 2020 BJU International Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  #andrology; #erectiledysfunction; #priapism; erectile dysfunction; priapism; surgical management

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32501654     DOI: 10.1111/bju.15127

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  2 in total

Review 1.  Surgical and minimally invasive treatment of ischaemic and non-ischaemic priapism: a systematic review by the EAU Sexual and Reproductive Health Guidelines panel.

Authors:  S Minhas; A Salonia; U Milenkovic; A Cocci; R Veeratterapillay; K Dimitropoulos; L Boeri; P Capogrosso; N C Cilesiz; M Gul; G Hatzichristodoulou; V Modgil; G I Russo; T Tharakan; M I Omar; C Bettocchi; J Carvalho; Y Yuhong; G Corona; H Jones; A Kadioglu; J I Martinez-Salamanca; P Verze; E C Serefoglu
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 2.408

Review 2.  Recent advances in understanding and treating priapism.

Authors:  Hussain M Alnajjar; Asif Muneer
Journal:  Fac Rev       Date:  2022-08-26
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.