Literature DB >> 32501607

Selective C-reactive protein apheresis for Covid-19 patients suffering from organ damage.

Stefan Kayser1, Rudolf Kunze2, Ahmed Sheriff1,3.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32501607      PMCID: PMC7300911          DOI: 10.1111/1744-9987.13532

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ther Apher Dial        ISSN: 1744-9979            Impact factor:   2.195


× No keyword cloud information.
Dear Editor, Up to May 19, 2020, severe acute respiratory syndrome‐coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) infections (causing Covid‐19) were confirmed in more than 4.5 million people worldwide. The mortality rate is approximately 7%; however, in the age group above 60 years it is more than 20%. SARS‐CoV‐2 induces lung fibrosis and cardiac complications among other organ deteriorations in a small percentage of the infected population. The current therapeutic approach focuses on the treatment of the acute respiratory distress syndrome, as it is the main cause of mortality, followed by cardiac and septic complications. Pulmonary fibrosis is accompanied by a first cytokine storm followed by a massive increase of CRP levels. So far, there is no therapeutic option to reduce the extremely high synthesis of CRP. It triggers tissue damage itself and is thus also causally involved in the enlargement of destroyed tissue and contributes to irreversible tissue destruction. , During the clinical manifestation of Covid‐19 infection, both IL‐6 and CRP increase drastically. While IL‐6 is used as a classical prognostic marker of inflammation, the CRP concentration often correlates with the overall clinical picture and is strongly elevated (>150 mg/L) over several days, especially in severely ill patients with a high risk of death. With this background, the rapid reduction of extremely high CRP levels in medium and severe courses of Covid‐19 could be a rationally comprehensible therapeutic approach. Selective extracorporeal CRP apheresis lowers the CRP concentration drastically within a few hours, and the repeatable treatment is safe, efficient, and selective. Clear evidence has been shown in previous clinical studies, which investigated CRP apheresis after myocardial infarction, that CRP depletion reduces systemic inflammation and cardiac tissue damage. The pathomechanism derived from these previous findings , is shown schematically in Figure 1. According to this model, the infection of the epithelial cells leads to the production and release of SARS‐CoV‐2 and to the activation of proinflammatory cytokines and consequently CRP. This occurs in the sense of a vicious circle, that is, at the expense of the healthy cell population not only in the lung but also in other ischemic tissues and leads to a continuous decrease in the latter if regeneration cannot take place to the same extent. Specifically the strong and lasting increase of the CRP concentration is striking. Such extremely high CRP levels have never been observed in this magnitude in any other acute or chronic viral infectious disease. The ubiquitous molecular pathomechanism of CRP (complement‐mediated) suggests that the tissue‐protective effect of CRP apheresis also occurs in tissues other than the heart muscle, for example in the lung.
FIGURE 1

Hypothesized pathomechanism of lung destruction by severe acute respiratory syndrome‐coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) and the triggered immunoreaction. Infection of lung epithelial cells leads to the production and release of SARS‐CoV‐2 and to the activation of proinflammatory cytokines, and consequently CRP. This subsequently triggers more inflammation and leads to a vicious circle, finally damaging not only infected cells but also healthy tissue. The model adapts previous findings ,

Hypothesized pathomechanism of lung destruction by severe acute respiratory syndrome‐coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) and the triggered immunoreaction. Infection of lung epithelial cells leads to the production and release of SARS‐CoV‐2 and to the activation of proinflammatory cytokines, and consequently CRP. This subsequently triggers more inflammation and leads to a vicious circle, finally damaging not only infected cells but also healthy tissue. The model adapts previous findings , We hypothesize that it is beneficial for Covid‐19 patients to be treated by CRP apheresis, especially in the early phase of incipient pulmonary fibrosis. This therapeutic option presents an extremely low risk and expected benefit for patients. Therefore, we propose to acknowledge this treatment and recommend a clinical pilot trial, which can evaluate CRP apheresis in patients suffering from Covid‐19.
  7 in total

1.  Selective C-Reactive Protein-Apheresis in Patients.

Authors:  Wolfgang Ries; Franz Heigl; Christoph Garlichs; Ahmed Sheriff; Jan Torzewski
Journal:  Ther Apher Dial       Date:  2019-04-29       Impact factor: 1.762

2.  A rampage through the body.

Authors:  Meredith Wadman; Jennifer Couzin-Frankel; Jocelyn Kaiser; Catherine Matacic
Journal:  Science       Date:  2020-04-24       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Selective apheresis of C-reactive protein: a new therapeutic option in myocardial infarction?

Authors:  Ahmed Sheriff; Ralf Schindler; Birgit Vogt; Hassan Abdel-Aty; Juliane K Unger; Christopher Bock; Frank Gebauer; Anna Slagman; Timo Jerichow; Dörte Mans; Gülcan Yapici; Gunnar Janelt; Malte Schröder; Rudolf Kunze; Martin Möckel
Journal:  J Clin Apher       Date:  2014-07-05       Impact factor: 2.821

4.  Clinical and immunological features of severe and moderate coronavirus disease 2019.

Authors:  Guang Chen; Di Wu; Wei Guo; Yong Cao; Da Huang; Hongwu Wang; Tao Wang; Xiaoyun Zhang; Huilong Chen; Haijing Yu; Xiaoping Zhang; Minxia Zhang; Shiji Wu; Jianxin Song; Tao Chen; Meifang Han; Shusheng Li; Xiaoping Luo; Jianping Zhao; Qin Ning
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 14.808

5.  First-in-Man: Case Report of Selective C-Reactive Protein Apheresis in a Patient with SARS-CoV-2 Infection.

Authors:  Jan Torzewski; Franz Heigl; Oliver Zimmermann; Florian Wagner; Christian Schumann; Reinhard Hettich; Christopher Bock; Stefan Kayser; Ahmed Sheriff
Journal:  Am J Case Rep       Date:  2020-07-14

6.  Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China.

Authors:  Chaolin Huang; Yeming Wang; Xingwang Li; Lili Ren; Jianping Zhao; Yi Hu; Li Zhang; Guohui Fan; Jiuyang Xu; Xiaoying Gu; Zhenshun Cheng; Ting Yu; Jiaan Xia; Yuan Wei; Wenjuan Wu; Xuelei Xie; Wen Yin; Hui Li; Min Liu; Yan Xiao; Hong Gao; Li Guo; Jungang Xie; Guangfa Wang; Rongmeng Jiang; Zhancheng Gao; Qi Jin; Jianwei Wang; Bin Cao
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Clinical predictors of mortality due to COVID-19 based on an analysis of data of 150 patients from Wuhan, China.

Authors:  Qiurong Ruan; Kun Yang; Wenxia Wang; Lingyu Jiang; Jianxin Song
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2020-03-03       Impact factor: 17.440

  7 in total
  8 in total

1.  Understanding the role of therapeutic plasma exchange in COVID-19: preliminary guidance and practices.

Authors:  Gopal K Patidar; Kevin J Land; Hans Vrielink; Naomi Rahimi-Levene; Eldad J Dann; Hind Al-Humaidan; Steven L Spitalnik; Yashaswi Dhiman; Cynthia So-Osman; Salwa I Hindawi
Journal:  Vox Sang       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 2.996

Review 2.  An aberrant STAT pathway is central to COVID-19.

Authors:  Toshifumi Matsuyama; Shawn P Kubli; Steven K Yoshinaga; Klaus Pfeffer; Tak W Mak
Journal:  Cell Death Differ       Date:  2020-10-09       Impact factor: 15.828

3.  A Report on the First 7 Sequential Patients Treated Within the C-Reactive Protein Apheresis in COVID (CACOV) Registry.

Authors:  Christian Schumann; Franz Heigl; Imanuel J Rohrbach; Ahmed Sheriff; Lutz Wagner; Florian Wagner; Jan Torzewski
Journal:  Am J Case Rep       Date:  2022-01-10

Review 4.  Targeting C-Reactive Protein by Selective Apheresis in Humans: Pros and Cons.

Authors:  Jan Torzewski; Patrizia Brunner; Wolfgang Ries; Christoph D Garlichs; Stefan Kayser; Franz Heigl; Ahmed Sheriff
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 4.241

5.  Seven COVID-19 Patients Treated with C-Reactive Protein (CRP) Apheresis.

Authors:  Fabrizio Esposito; Harald Matthes; Friedemann Schad
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 4.241

Review 6.  Selective Apheresis of C-Reactive Protein for Treatment of Indications with Elevated CRP Concentrations.

Authors:  Stefan Kayser; Patrizia Brunner; Katharina Althaus; Johannes Dorst; Ahmed Sheriff
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-09-12       Impact factor: 4.241

Review 7.  Patients with COVID-19: in the dark-NETs of neutrophils.

Authors:  Maximilian Ackermann; Hans-Joachim Anders; Rostyslav Bilyy; Gary L Bowlin; Christoph Daniel; Rebecca De Lorenzo; Mikala Egeblad; Timo Henneck; Andrés Hidalgo; Markus Hoffmann; Bettina Hohberger; Yogendra Kanthi; Mariana J Kaplan; Jason S Knight; Jasmin Knopf; Elzbieta Kolaczkowska; Paul Kubes; Moritz Leppkes; Aparna Mahajan; Angelo A Manfredi; Christian Maueröder; Norma Maugeri; Ioannis Mitroulis; Luis E Muñoz; Teluguakula Narasaraju; Elisabeth Naschberger; Indira Neeli; Lai Guan Ng; Marko Z Radic; Konstantinos Ritis; Patrizia Rovere-Querini; Mirco Schapher; Christine Schauer; Hans-Uwe Simon; Jeeshan Singh; Panagiotis Skendros; Konstantin Stark; Michael Stürzl; Johan van der Vlag; Peter Vandenabeele; Ljubomir Vitkov; Maren von Köckritz-Blickwede; Cansu Yanginlar; Shida Yousefi; Alexander Zarbock; Georg Schett; Martin Herrmann
Journal:  Cell Death Differ       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 15.828

Review 8.  [CRP apheresis in acute myocardial infarction and COVID-19].

Authors:  Michael Buerke; Ahmed Sheriff; Christoph D Garlichs
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2022-03-25       Impact factor: 1.552

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.