| Literature DB >> 32501529 |
Daniel Moreno Berggren1, Matilda Kjellander2, Ellen Backlund1, Marie Engvall3, Hege Garelius4, Fryderyk Lorenz5, Lars Nilsson6, Bengt Rasmussen7, Sören Lehmann1, Eva Hellström-Lindberg2, Martin Jädersten2, Johanna Ungerstedt2, Elisabeth Ejerblad1.
Abstract
Outcomes in chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia (CMML) are highly variable and may be affected by comorbidity. Therefore, prognostic models and comorbidity indices are important tools to estimate survival and to guide clinicians in individualising treatment. In this nationwide population-based study, we assess comorbidities and for the first time validate comorbidity indices in CMML. We also compare the prognostic power of: the revised International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-R), CMML-specific prognostic scoring system (CPSS), MD Anderson Prognostic Scoring System (MDAPS) and Mayo score. In this cohort of 337 patients with CMML, diagnosed between 2009 and 2015, the median overall survival was 21·3 months. Autoimmune conditions were present in 25% of the patients, with polymyalgia rheumatica and Hashimoto's thyroiditis being most common. Of the tested comorbidity indices: the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), Haematopoietic cell transplantation-specific Comorbidity Index (HCT-CI) and Myelodysplastic Syndrome-Specific Comorbidity Index (MDS-CI), CCI had the highest C-index (0·62) and was the only comorbidity index independently associated with survival in multivariable analyses. When comparing the prognostic power of the scoring systems, the CPSS had the highest C-index (0·69). In conclusion, using 'real-world' data we found that the CCI and CPSS have the best prognostic power and that autoimmune conditions are overrepresented in CMML.Entities:
Keywords: CMML-specific prognostic scoring system (CPSS); chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia (CMML); comorbidity index; population-based study; prognostic scores
Year: 2020 PMID: 32501529 DOI: 10.1111/bjh.16790
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Br J Haematol ISSN: 0007-1048 Impact factor: 6.998