Literature DB >> 32501152

Classification of breast masses on ultrasound shear wave elastography using convolutional neural networks.

Tomoyuki Fujioka1, Leona Katsuta1, Kazunori Kubota1,2, Mio Mori1, Yuka Kikuchi1, Arisa Kato1, Goshi Oda3, Tsuyoshi Nakagawa3, Yoshio Kitazume1, Ukihide Tateishi1.   

Abstract

We aimed to use deep learning with convolutional neural networks (CNNs) to discriminate images of benign and malignant breast masses on ultrasound shear wave elastography (SWE). We retrospectively gathered 158 images of benign masses and 146 images of malignant masses as training data for SWE. A deep learning model was constructed using several CNN architectures (Xception, InceptionV3, InceptionResNetV2, DenseNet121, DenseNet169, and NASNetMobile) with 50, 100, and 200 epochs. We analyzed SWE images of 38 benign masses and 35 malignant masses as test data. Two radiologists interpreted these test data through a consensus reading using a 5-point visual color assessment (SWEc) and the mean elasticity value (in kPa) (SWEe). Sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were calculated. The best CNN model (which was DenseNet169 with 100 epochs), SWEc, and SWEe had a sensitivity of 0.857, 0.829, and 0.914 and a specificity of 0.789, 0.737, and 0.763 respectively. The CNNs exhibited a mean AUC of 0.870 (range, 0.844-0.898), and SWEc and SWEe had an AUC of 0.821 and 0.855. The CNNs had an equal or better diagnostic performance compared with radiologist readings. DenseNet169 with 100 epochs, Xception with 50 epochs, and Xception with 100 epochs had a better diagnostic performance compared with SWEc (P = 0.018-0.037). Deep learning with CNNs exhibited equal or higher AUC compared with radiologists when discriminating benign from malignant breast masses on ultrasound SWE.

Keywords:  breast imaging; convolutional neural network; deep learning; elastography; shear wave elastography; ultrasound

Year:  2020        PMID: 32501152     DOI: 10.1177/0161734620932609

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrason Imaging        ISSN: 0161-7346            Impact factor:   1.578


  8 in total

Review 1.  The Utility of Deep Learning in Breast Ultrasonic Imaging: A Review.

Authors:  Tomoyuki Fujioka; Mio Mori; Kazunori Kubota; Jun Oyama; Emi Yamaga; Yuka Yashima; Leona Katsuta; Kyoko Nomura; Miyako Nara; Goshi Oda; Tsuyoshi Nakagawa; Yoshio Kitazume; Ukihide Tateishi
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2020-12-06

2.  Shear Wave Elastography-Assisted Ultrasound Breast Image Analysis and Identification of Abnormal Data.

Authors:  Caoxin Yan; Zhiyan Luo; Zimei Lin; Huilin He; Yunkai Luo; Jian Chen
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 2.682

3.  Combination of shear wave elastography and BI-RADS in identification of solid breast masses.

Authors:  Xue Zheng; Fei Li; Zhi-Dong Xuan; Yu Wang; Lei Zhang
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 1.930

4.  The efficacy of deep learning models in the diagnosis of endometrial cancer using MRI: a comparison with radiologists.

Authors:  Aiko Urushibara; Tsukasa Saida; Kensaku Mori; Toshitaka Ishiguro; Kei Inoue; Tomohiko Masumoto; Toyomi Satoh; Takahito Nakajima
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2022-04-30       Impact factor: 2.795

Review 5.  Ultrasound radiomics in personalized breast management: Current status and future prospects.

Authors:  Jionghui Gu; Tian'an Jiang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-08-17       Impact factor: 5.738

6.  Differentiation of carcinosarcoma from endometrial carcinoma on magnetic resonance imaging using deep learning.

Authors:  Tsukasa Saida; Kensaku Mori; Sodai Hoshiai; Masafumi Sakai; Aiko Urushibara; Toshitaka Ishiguro; Toyomi Satoh; Takahito Nakajima
Journal:  Pol J Radiol       Date:  2022-09-21

Review 7.  Breast Tumour Classification Using Ultrasound Elastography with Machine Learning: A Systematic Scoping Review.

Authors:  Ye-Jiao Mao; Hyo-Jung Lim; Ming Ni; Wai-Hin Yan; Duo Wai-Chi Wong; James Chung-Wai Cheung
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 6.639

8.  Study on association between shear wave elastography parameters and clinicopathological characteristics in breast cancer: A protocol for systematic review.

Authors:  Hong-Hong Xue; Yuan-Yuan Wang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-11-20       Impact factor: 1.817

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.