Literature DB >> 32500779

Personality and educational level determine self-reported health-related quality-of-life and distress in patients with renal tumors awaiting radical surgery.

Elisabeth Beisland1, Elen M Hauge2, Anne K H Aarstad3, Marianne J Hjermstad4,5, Hans J Aarstad2,6, Christian Beisland2,7.   

Abstract

Objective: Data on preoperative distress and health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) is lacking for patients with newly diagnosed renal tumors. This study aims to compare HRQoL within this group with the general population and to study the relationship between distress, HRQoL, personality, coping, and patient/tumor-related factors.Materials and methods: Between January 2011 and June 2014, 153 patients (100 males/53 females), scheduled for surgery were prospectively included. Distress was determined by the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ), HRQoL by EORTC-QLQ-C30 questionnaire, personality by Eysenck Personality Inventory and coping by COPE questionnaire. HRQoL-data from an age and gender matched Norwegian reference population was used for comparison.
Results: The study patients had significantly poorer HRQoL than the reference population. GHQ and HRQoL sum scores had a common variance (CV = r2) of 29-35%. In regression models, the measured variables accounted for 33% of the variance for the GHQ score. Significant predictors of the measured variance were neuroticism (18%), education level (3%) and avoidant coping (2%). Similarly, the measured variables accounted for 33-44% of the variance for the HRQoL sum scores. For all HRQoL sum scores, neuroticism predicted 17-28%, while education predicted 4-11% of the measured variance. Large tumor size, comorbidity, performance status and CRP predicted 2-7% of individual sum scores.Conclusions: For both preoperative distress and HRQoL, personality traits such as neuroticism and education level were the most important predictors. Tumor-related factors and other preexisting conditions seemed to be of lesser importance. Thus, preoperatively screening of psychological factors could be helpful to identify those at risk of poor outcomes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Health-related quality-of-life; baseline data; distress; kidney tumors; personality; preoperative evaluation; psychological factors; renal cell carcinoma

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32500779     DOI: 10.1080/21681805.2020.1773528

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Urol        ISSN: 2168-1805            Impact factor:   1.612


  3 in total

1.  Quality of life among cancer inpatients 80 years and older: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jorunn Drageset; Reidun Karin Sandvik; Leslie Sofia Pareja Eide; Gunhild Austrheim; Mary Fox; Elisabeth Grov Beisland
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2021-03-20       Impact factor: 3.186

Review 2.  Quality of Life and Psychological Distress among Patients with Small Renal Masses.

Authors:  Liliana Vartolomei; Andrei Cotruș; Camelia Stanciu; Cristian Delcea; Marco Tozzi; Elena Lievore; Felice Crocetto; Francesco Del Giudice; Giuseppe Lucarelli; Matteo Muto; Matteo Ferro
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-07-07       Impact factor: 4.964

3.  Nurse-led telephone follow-up according to the revised nursing outcomes classification for laryngeal carcinoma surgery patients: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Yongxia Ding; Jinxia Xu; Yan Ning; Qian Wang; Zhaojie Chang
Journal:  BMC Nurs       Date:  2022-10-17
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.