Literature DB >> 32500560

Association of CD8 T cell apoptosis and EGFR mutation in non-small lung cancer patients.

Chao Zhao1, Chunxia Su2, Xuefei Li1, Caicun Zhou2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The abundance of tumor infiltrating CD8 T cells is an important parameter for antitumor effect of PD-1/PD-L1 immune checkpoint inhibitors, which is less in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation than wild-type non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The mechanism still requires further study.
METHODS: In total 190 surgical lung adenocarcinoma samples were included. EGFR mutation was detected using amplification-refractory mutation system. CD8 T cells and apoptosis were assessed by immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence staining in tumor samples. Exosomes extracted from lung cancer cell lines with and without EGFR mutation were used to test the function of promoting apoptosis in vitro.
RESULTS: The ratio of CD8 tumor infiltration lymphocytes was significantly lower in EGFR-mutant than in wild-type patients (P = 0.026). A higher ratio of apoptosis was also prone to occur in EGFR-mutant patients (P = 0.035). The distribution of apoptosis was not statistically associated with the ratio of CD8 TILs. An in vitro experiment indicated that exosomes secreted by EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer cell lines PC9 and HCC827 were more capable of promoting CD8 T cell apoptosis than EGFR wild-type cell lines H1299 and SK-MES-1 (P = 0.007 and P = 0.010, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Non-small cell lung cancer EGFR mutation could promote CD8 T cell apoptosis more than wild-type. Inhibiting CD8 + TILs apoptosis may strengthen immunotherapy effects in EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients.
© 2020 The Authors. Thoracic Cancer published by China Lung Oncology Group and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Apoptosis; immunotherapy; lung cancer; tumor infiltrating lymphocytes

Year:  2020        PMID: 32500560      PMCID: PMC7396381          DOI: 10.1111/1759-7714.13504

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Thorac Cancer        ISSN: 1759-7706            Impact factor:   3.500


Background

Immunotherapy targeting programmed cell death receptor 1/ligand 1 (PD‐1/PD‐L1) has been shown to exhibit good effect and durable response in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) wild‐type non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. , , , , , , However, in EGFR‐mutant NSCLC patients, the response rate has been reported to be very low. , Compared with EGFR wild‐type patients, EGFR‐mutant patients do not appear to benefit more from immunotherapy than chemotherapy. , The underlying mechanisms therefore still require further study. A retrospective study showed that CD8 + T‐cell abundance was the most predictive parameter of the response to anti‐PD‐1/PD‐L1 therapy across many cancer types,12 and the ratio of CD8 + TILs was significantly lower in EGFR‐mutant than in wild‐type patients. , Increasing the number of CD8 + TILs may be a promising strategy to enhance the immunotherapy effect for EGFR mutation in NSCLC patients. Zhu et al. reviewed former studies, and found that TILs frequently undergo apoptosis induced by tumor cells, which may influence the abundance. Horton et al. showed that tumor could specifically induce CD8 + TILs apoptosis, and reducing CD8 + TILs apoptosis could boost tumor control when combined with immutherapy. In immunotherapy, CD8+ T cell apoptosis could also be a key point which impedes the effect of one immune inhibitor on another. Exosomes are cell released extracellular vesicles with a size range of 40–160 nm in diameter, and play important roles in regulating the tumor microenvironment. PD‐L1 positive NSCLC exosomes have been reported to induce CD8 + T cell apoptosis. Exosomes expressing FasL have also been reported to mediate CD8 + T cell apoptosis. Whether exosomes of EGFR‐mutant and wild‐type NSCLC have a different ability to promote CD8 + T cell apoptosis has not been previously reported. From the above studies, we presume that the apoptosis caused the difference of CD8 + TILs abundance between EGFR‐mutant and wild‐type NSCLC. In this study, lung adenocarcinoma samples and peripheral blood were used to detect apoptosis of CD8 + T cells, and we hoped that the results would provide indications for current immunotherapy.

Methods

Patients

From January 2017 to December 2018, 190 formalin‐fixed paraffin‐embedded surgical lung adenocarcinoma samples in Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital were included. All patients consented to EGFR gene detection. Disease‐free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were followed‐up until November 2019. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital (K19‐066Y).

Gene mutation detection

EGFR mutation detection was conducted using the Amplification‐Refractory Mutation System. FFPE DNA extraction kit (Amoy Diagnostics, Xiamen, China) was used to extract tumor DNA. EGFR mutation was detected by EGFR 29 Mutations Detection Kit (Amoy Diagnostics, Xiamen, China) using 80 ng DNA. The procedures were followed‐up as described in the protocol. PCR was performed on a Stratagene Mx3000P cycler (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA) using the following program: Five minutes at 95°C (one cycle); 25 seconds at 95°C, 20 seconds at 64°C, and 20 seconds at 72°C (15 cycles); 25 seconds at 93°C, 35 seconds at 60°C, and 20 seconds at 72°C (31 cycles). The results were determined as described in the protocol.

Immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence staining

CD8 immunohistochemistry antibody (cat no.ab4055, Abcam) was used to stain TILs in tumor samples. Brown or yellow‐brown staining of tumor infiltrating cells was defined as positive. CD8 TILs was grouped using a cutoff value of 5% similarly as reported in other studies. , Apoptosis was stained using TUNEL apoptosis staining kit (cat no.11684817910, Roche), and low, medium and high levels were determined as <1%, 1–5% and ≥5%. CD8 and TUNEL immunofluorescence costaining was conducted in 10 randomly selected tumor samples to show the condition of CD8 + T cell apoptosis.

CD8 + T cell apoptosis detection

Peripheral blood samples were collected from 11 healthy volunteers, and utilized for peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) separation in two hours using Ficoll‐Paque PREMIUM (cat no.17544203, GE Healthcare). PBMCs were placed on a 12‐well plate, and cultured in DMEM medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 100 U/mL penicillin, and 100 mg/mL streptomycin for 4–6 hours. Then, 30 μg exosomes extracted from cell lines culture supernatants were added to the medium, and cultured for 48 hours. Finally, CD3 (557 832, BD Pharmingen), CD8 (555 366, BD Pharmingen) and Annexin‐V (88 800 774, eBioscience) were stained and analyzed using flow cytometry.

Exosome extraction and detection

The culture supernatants of PC9, HCC827, H1299 and SK‐MES‐1 cell lines were used to extract exosomes by total exosome isolation reagent (cat no.4478359, Invitrogen). Briefly, the supernatants were centrifuged at 2000 rpm for 30 minutes. The debris was discarded, and the supernatants were added to half the volume of the isolation reagent, and recentrifuged at 10 000 g for 60 minutes at 4°C. The precipitates were dissolved in 50–100 μL PBS buffer and stored at −80°C for future use.

Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS v.20 software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Comparisons of clinicopathological features between different CD8 stainings were evaluated by Pearson Chi‐square test or Fisher's exact test. Mann‐Whitney U test was used to analyze the features among different apoptosis levels. A paired t‐test was used for exosome‐induced CD8 + T cell apoptosis analysis. The two‐sided significance level was set at P < 0.05.

Results

Ratio of CD8 TILs in lung cancer patients

CD8 was stained in 161 tumor samples, and grouped as high and low ratio using cutoff value of 5% (Figure S1). The clinicopathological features between high and low ratio CD8 TILs were investigated in the study (Table 1). EGFR mutation samples had a lower ratio of CD8 expression than wild‐type (P = 0.026), and there was no significant difference in other clinicopathological features.
Table 1

Clinicopathological features of CD8 staining surgical lung adenocarcinoma samples

CD8
Low N (%)High N (%) P‐value
Sex
Female49 (58.3)42 (54.5)0.628
Male35 (41.7)35 (45.5)
Age
<6545 (53.6)39 (50.6)0.711
≥6539 (46.4)38(49.4)
Smoking status
Never61 (72.6)54 (70.1)0.727
Light/smoker23 (27.4)23 (29.9)
EGFR status
Mutation55 (65.5)37 (48.1)0.026
Wild‐type29 (34.5)40 (51.9)
Disease stage
I–II75 (89.3)66 (85.7)0.493
III–IV9 (10.7)11 (14.3)
T
T178 (92.9)71 (92.2)0.875
Others6 (7.1)6 (7.8)
N
N078 (92.9)70 (90.9)0.650
Others6 (7.1)7 (9.1)
M
M075 (89.3)66 (85.7)0.493
Others9 (10.7)11 (14.3)
Clinicopathological features of CD8 staining surgical lung adenocarcinoma samples

Ratio of apoptosis in lung cancer patients

Total cell apoptosis was stained in the 190 samples. As more than half the samples had a low ratio of apoptosis, which was less than 1%, we further used a 5% cutoff value to classify the higher ratio of apoptosis. A higher level of apoptosis was prone to occur in patients harboring an EGFR mutation (P = 0.035) (Fig 1a,b). CD8 and TUNEL immunofluorescence costaining showed that CD8 + T cell underwent apoptosis (Fig 1c). However, as the sample number was small (five EGFR mutation and five wild‐type), we did not further analyze the association between the ratio of CD8 + T cell apoptosis and EGFR mutation status. We analyzed the association between EGFR subtypes and apoptosis, and found no significant difference between EGFR 19del and L858R, as well as EGFR common mutations (19del/L858R) and rare mutations (Figure S2A,B). The distribution of apoptosis on other clinical features was also not significantly different, except on disease stage (Figure S2C–F). Multivariate analysis showed that disease stage, but not EGFR mutation status, was significantly associated with the ratio of apoptosis (P = 0.003, Table S1). We will, therefore, study further with in vitro experiements whether EGFR mutation has a stronger ability than wild‐type.
Figure 1

Apoptosis in lung adenocarcinoma samples. (a) DAPI and TUNEL were stained in tumor samples. Low refers to the ratio of apoptosis less than 1%; medium refers to 1%–5%; high refers to above 5%. (b) The distribution of apoptosis ratio was compared between EGFR mutation and wild‐type samples () Low, () Medium, and () High. (c) CD8 and TUNEL immunofluorescence costaining was conducted in tumor samples to show CD8+ T cell apoptosis.

Apoptosis in lung adenocarcinoma samples. (a) DAPI and TUNEL were stained in tumor samples. Low refers to the ratio of apoptosis less than 1%; medium refers to 1%–5%; high refers to above 5%. (b) The distribution of apoptosis ratio was compared between EGFR mutation and wild‐type samples () Low, () Medium, and () High. (c) CD8 and TUNEL immunofluorescence costaining was conducted in tumor samples to show CD8+ T cell apoptosis.

Association between ratio of CD8 TILs and apoptosis

We investigated whether there was an association between CD8 TILs ratio and apoptosis in EGFR mutation and wild‐type patients (Fig 2). However, in the EGFR mutation as well as wild‐type groups, there was no significant difference (P = 0.102 and P = 0.417, respectively). Another cutoff value was used, but also showed no significant difference between the patients.
Figure 2

The association between the ratio of CD8 and apoptosis was analyzed in EGFR mutation and wild‐type samples. Low, medium and high levels of apoptosis were determined as <1%, 1–5% and ≥5%. The cutoff value of CD8 ratio was 5% () High, () Medium, and () Low (a) and 10% () High, () Medium, and () Low (b).

The association between the ratio of CD8 and apoptosis was analyzed in EGFR mutation and wild‐type samples. Low, medium and high levels of apoptosis were determined as <1%, 1–5% and ≥5%. The cutoff value of CD8 ratio was 5% () High, () Medium, and () Low (a) and 10% () High, () Medium, and () Low (b).

Exosomes from mutation cell lines induced CD8 + T cell apoptosis

To further explore whether EGFR mutation and wild‐type had different effects on CD8 T cell apoptosis, exosomes from EGFR mutation cell line PC9 and wild‐type cell line H1299 were used to treat cultured PBMC (Fig 3). The results showed that although there was no significant difference in apoptosis of all the treated cells between EGFR mutation and wild‐type groups, PC9 cell exosomes could promote CD8 T cell apoptosis, and the effect was stronger than that from H1299 (P = 0.007). We also found that PC9 exosomes possessed a similar ability to promote CD8 + T cell apoptosis with EGFR mutation cell line HCC827 exosomes (P = 0.626, Fig 3c), and HCC827 exosomes had a stronger ability to promote CD8 + T cell apoptosis than the EGFR wild‐type cell line SK‐MES‐1 (P = 0.010, Fig 3d).
Figure 3

The function of exosomes in promoting apoptosis. Exosomes from EGFR mutation cell lines PC9 and HCC827, and wild‐type cell lines H1299 and SK‐MES‐1 were extracted and used to treat PBMCs from healthy volunteers. The apoptosis ratio of CD3+ PBMCs (a) and CD3 + CD8+ cells (b, c, d) were compared, respectively. Control: PBMCs without exosome treatment; PC9, HCC827, H1299, SK‐MES‐1: PBMCs treated with 30μg PC9, HCC827, H1299, SK‐MES‐1 cell exosomes for 24 hours.

The function of exosomes in promoting apoptosis. Exosomes from EGFR mutation cell lines PC9 and HCC827, and wild‐type cell lines H1299 and SK‐MES‐1 were extracted and used to treat PBMCs from healthy volunteers. The apoptosis ratio of CD3+ PBMCs (a) and CD3 + CD8+ cells (b, c, d) were compared, respectively. Control: PBMCs without exosome treatment; PC9, HCC827, H1299, SK‐MES‐1: PBMCs treated with 30μg PC9, HCC827, H1299, SK‐MES‐1 cell exosomes for 24 hours.

Patient survival

Until the end of the follow‐up date, 161 patients had no disease recurrence or metastasis, DFS data was obtained in four patients, and 25 patients were lost to follow‐up. Of the four patients, two were harboring EGFR mutation and two were harboring EGFR wild‐type (Table 2). Three of the four patients had an apoptosis ratio greater than 5%. However, the treatment was complicated in these patients, and it is therefore unreasonable to speculate the function of apoptosis to patient prognosis based only on DFS data. More survival data are needed in order to carry out further analyses.
Table 2

Characteristics of patients obtained DFS data

No.SexAgeSmoking statusDisease stage EGFR statusTreatmentCD8 ratioApoptosis ratioDFS (month)OS (month)
1M69YesIV19delTKI†Low>5%18.0NA
2F71NoneIWTNALow>5%9.5NA
3F54NoneIVL861QTKIHigh>5%8.0NA
4M68YesIVWTChemoLow<1%6.6NA

TKI, tyrosine kinase inhibitors; Chemo, chemotherapy.

Characteristics of patients obtained DFS data TKI, tyrosine kinase inhibitors; Chemo, chemotherapy.

Discussion

Immunotherapy has been widely used in EGFR and ALK wild‐type NSCLC patients; however, in EGFR mutation or ALK rearrangement patients, the effect is unsatisfactory. The mechanism behind the mystery therefore still needs to be determined. To date, there are three main factors to explain this issue: TILs, tumor mutation burden (TMB), and PD‐L1 expression. The abundance of CD8 + TILs has been reported to be a better parameter than the other two factors to predict the response to anti‐PD‐1/PD‐L1 therapy across many cancer types. We and others have reported that CD8 + TILs have been found to be relatively lower in EGFR‐mutant than in wild‐type patients. , In this study, we aimed to explore what induces the difference between the two patient groups. Recently, the mechanism of apoptosis in TILs has been reviewed, but the study was mainly focused on the Fas‐FasL pathway. A study in a melanoma model showed that CD8 + TILs had high rates of apoptosis and preventing apoptosis could improve tumor control. These studies indicate that CD8 + TILs could undergo apoptosis in a tumor microenvironment, and inhibiting apoptosis may boost the immunotherapy effect. In this study, apoptosis was stained in tumor tissues and the results showed that EGFR mutation samples had a higher apoptosis ratio of tumor infiltrating cells than wild‐type. Multivariate analysis showed that EGFR mutation status was not significantly associated with CD8 + T cell apoptosis. However, based on the previous results in the study, cell line experiments in vitro could be used to further detect whether EGFR mutation could promote CD8 + T cell apoptosis compared with wild‐type. In the future, we will also collect more advanced stage samples to confirm whether disease stage is an independent factor to influence CD8 + T cell apoptosis. Next, we analyzed the association between the ratio of CD8 TILs and apoptosis in EGFR‐mutant or wild‐type patients; however, no significant difference was found. As far as we know, there may be two potential reasons. First, the ratio of CD8 TILs had no association with the ratio of apoptosis. Second, there was an association between them, but it was concealed by apoptosis of other cells. To further test the promoting apoptosis function of EGFR mutation and wild‐type NSCLC to CD8 + T cells, exosomes were extracted from cell lines and used to treat CD8 + T cells in vitro. Exosomes are a type of extracellular vesicle secreted by cell types that mediate intercellular communication, and also play important roles in immunotherapy. The results suggested that exosomes could promote CD8 + T cell apoptosis, and the function was stronger in EGFR‐mutant NSCLC than wild‐type. Based on the results, more questions were raised, such as which content induces apoptosis, which subtype of CD8 TILs undergoes apotosis, or are there other types of cell that experience apoptosis? It has been reported that PD‐L1 expression on exosomes of NSCLC patients could promote CD8 + T cell apoptosis, rather than inhibit proliferation. As exosomes are composed of many proteins, RNA and lipids, whether there is another factor, especially that is different between EGFR mutation and wild‐type exosomes which induces apoptosis, should be studied in the future. The abundance of CD8 + CD39 + T cells was reported to be a good parameter for immunotherapy, and was less in EGFR‐mutant than wild‐type NSCLC patients. Whether this kind of cell undergo apoptosis more in EGFR mutation than wild‐type NSCLC patients also need to be studied further. There are limitations in this study. First, the apoptosis was stained on all the cells to overview the panorama. However, limited by the economic cost, the costaining of CD8 and apoptosis was only conducted on some of the samples to show the state of CD8 + TIL apoptosis. Costaining would be helpful to compare CD8 TILs apoptosis between EGFR mutation and wild‐type samples, which will be implemented in more samples in future studies. Second, the CD8 + T cells used in our study were from the PBMC of healthy volunteers, and therefore were not fully representative of those in the tumor microenvironment of NSCLC patients. CD8 TILs and their apoptosis could be detected in surgical fresh tumor tissues as well as biopsy tissues to validate the results. Third, the patients were mostly at an early stage, the survival data were not mature and also not fully analyzed in the study. Survival data needs further follow‐up to investigate the influence of different ratios of CD8 TILs and apoptosis to survival. In conclusion, our study determined that there was more apoptosis in EGFR‐mutant lung adenocarcinoma patients, and exosomes of EGFR mutation cell lines could promote CD8 + T cell apoptosis. Inhibiting CD8 + TILs apoptosis may be a feasible strategy to strengthen the immunotherapy effect.

Disclosure

The authors declare that they have no competing interests. Figure S1 CD8 immunohistochemistry staining in tumor samples. A cutoff value of 5% was used to group the samples. Left, below 5% (low ratio of CD8); Right, above 5% (high ratio of CD8). Click here for additional data file. Figure S2 Apoptosis between different clinicopathological features. The distribution of apoptosis ratio was compared on different EGFR mutation subtypes (A and B), sex (C), age (D), smoking history (E), and disease stage (F). Low, medium and high levels of apoptosis were determined as <1%, 1–5% and ≥5%. Click here for additional data file. Table S1 Logistic regression analysis of CD8 T cell apoptosis. Click here for additional data file.
  22 in total

1.  Atezolizumab versus docetaxel in patients with previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer (OAK): a phase 3, open-label, multicentre randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Achim Rittmeyer; Fabrice Barlesi; Daniel Waterkamp; Keunchil Park; Fortunato Ciardiello; Joachim von Pawel; Shirish M Gadgeel; Toyoaki Hida; Dariusz M Kowalski; Manuel Cobo Dols; Diego L Cortinovis; Joseph Leach; Jonathan Polikoff; Carlos Barrios; Fairooz Kabbinavar; Osvaldo Arén Frontera; Filippo De Marinis; Hande Turna; Jong-Seok Lee; Marcus Ballinger; Marcin Kowanetz; Pei He; Daniel S Chen; Alan Sandler; David R Gandara
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2016-12-13       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Pembrolizumab versus docetaxel for previously treated, PD-L1-positive, advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (KEYNOTE-010): a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Roy S Herbst; Paul Baas; Dong-Wan Kim; Enriqueta Felip; José L Pérez-Gracia; Ji-Youn Han; Julian Molina; Joo-Hang Kim; Catherine Dubos Arvis; Myung-Ju Ahn; Margarita Majem; Mary J Fidler; Gilberto de Castro; Marcelo Garrido; Gregory M Lubiniecki; Yue Shentu; Ellie Im; Marisa Dolled-Filhart; Edward B Garon
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2015-12-19       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Pembrolizumab versus Chemotherapy for PD-L1-Positive Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Martin Reck; Delvys Rodríguez-Abreu; Andrew G Robinson; Rina Hui; Tibor Csőszi; Andrea Fülöp; Maya Gottfried; Nir Peled; Ali Tafreshi; Sinead Cuffe; Mary O'Brien; Suman Rao; Katsuyuki Hotta; Melanie A Leiby; Gregory M Lubiniecki; Yue Shentu; Reshma Rangwala; Julie R Brahmer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2016-10-08       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Pembrolizumab plus Chemotherapy for Squamous Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Luis Paz-Ares; Alexander Luft; David Vicente; Ali Tafreshi; Mahmut Gümüş; Julien Mazières; Barbara Hermes; Filiz Çay Şenler; Tibor Csőszi; Andrea Fülöp; Jerónimo Rodríguez-Cid; Jonathan Wilson; Shunichi Sugawara; Terufumi Kato; Ki Hyeong Lee; Ying Cheng; Silvia Novello; Balazs Halmos; Xiaodong Li; Gregory M Lubiniecki; Bilal Piperdi; Dariusz M Kowalski
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2018-09-25       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Bystander CD8+ T cells are abundant and phenotypically distinct in human tumour infiltrates.

Authors:  Yannick Simoni; Etienne Becht; Michael Fehlings; Chiew Yee Loh; Si-Lin Koo; Karen Wei Weng Teng; Joe Poh Sheng Yeong; Rahul Nahar; Tong Zhang; Hassen Kared; Kaibo Duan; Nicholas Ang; Michael Poidinger; Yin Yeng Lee; Anis Larbi; Alexis J Khng; Emile Tan; Cherylin Fu; Ronnie Mathew; Melissa Teo; Wan Teck Lim; Chee Keong Toh; Boon-Hean Ong; Tina Koh; Axel M Hillmer; Angela Takano; Tony Kiat Hon Lim; Eng Huat Tan; Weiwei Zhai; Daniel S W Tan; Iain Beehuat Tan; Evan W Newell
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Nivolumab versus Docetaxel in Advanced Nonsquamous Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Hossein Borghaei; Luis Paz-Ares; Leora Horn; David R Spigel; Martin Steins; Neal E Ready; Laura Q Chow; Everett E Vokes; Enriqueta Felip; Esther Holgado; Fabrice Barlesi; Martin Kohlhäufl; Oscar Arrieta; Marco Angelo Burgio; Jérôme Fayette; Hervé Lena; Elena Poddubskaya; David E Gerber; Scott N Gettinger; Charles M Rudin; Naiyer Rizvi; Lucio Crinò; George R Blumenschein; Scott J Antonia; Cécile Dorange; Christopher T Harbison; Friedrich Graf Finckenstein; Julie R Brahmer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2015-09-27       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  EGFR Mutations and ALK Rearrangements Are Associated with Low Response Rates to PD-1 Pathway Blockade in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis.

Authors:  Justin F Gainor; Alice T Shaw; Lecia V Sequist; Xiujun Fu; Christopher G Azzoli; Zofia Piotrowska; Tiffany G Huynh; Ling Zhao; Linnea Fulton; Katherine R Schultz; Emily Howe; Anna F Farago; Ryan J Sullivan; James R Stone; Subba Digumarthy; Teresa Moran; Aaron N Hata; Yukako Yagi; Beow Y Yeap; Jeffrey A Engelman; Mari Mino-Kenudson
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2016-05-25       Impact factor: 12.531

8.  Prognostic value of PD-L1 expression in combination with CD8+ TILs density in patients with surgically resected non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Hui Yang; Jinpeng Shi; Dongmei Lin; Xuefei Li; Chao Zhao; Qi Wang; Limin Zhang; Tao Jiang; Sha Zhao; Xiaozhen Liu; Yijun Jia; Yajun Zhang; Weijing Cai; Caicun Zhou
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2017-11-23       Impact factor: 4.452

9.  Immune checkpoint inhibitors for patients with advanced lung cancer and oncogenic driver alterations: results from the IMMUNOTARGET registry.

Authors:  J Mazieres; A Drilon; A Lusque; L Mhanna; A B Cortot; L Mezquita; A A Thai; C Mascaux; S Couraud; R Veillon; M Van den Heuvel; J Neal; N Peled; M Früh; T L Ng; V Gounant; S Popat; J Diebold; J Sabari; V W Zhu; S I Rothschild; P Bironzo; A Martinez-Marti; A Curioni-Fontecedro; R Rosell; M Lattuca-Truc; M Wiesweg; B Besse; B Solomon; F Barlesi; R D Schouten; H Wakelee; D R Camidge; G Zalcman; S Novello; S I Ou; J Milia; O Gautschi
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 32.976

10.  Exosomal PD-L1 promotes tumor growth through immune escape in non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Jae Cheol Lee; Jin Kyung Rho; Dong Ha Kim; HyeongRyul Kim; Yun Jung Choi; Seon Ye Kim; Jung-Eun Lee; Ki Jung Sung; Young Hoon Sung; Chan-Gi Pack; Min-Kyo Jung; Buhm Han; Kunhee Kim; Woo Sung Kim; Soo Jeong Nam; Chang-Min Choi; Miyong Yun
Journal:  Exp Mol Med       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 8.718

View more
  5 in total

1.  Patients With Short PFS to EGFR-TKIs Predicted Better Response to Subsequent Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 Based Immunotherapy in EGFR Common Mutation NSCLC.

Authors:  Sangtian Liu; Fengying Wu; Xuefei Li; Chao Zhao; Yijun Jia; Keyi Jia; Ruoshuang Han; Meng Qiao; Wei Li; Jia Yu; Fei Zhou; Anwen Xiong; Bin Chen; Jue Fan; Shengxiang Ren; Caicun Zhou
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 6.244

2.  Multidimensional profiling depicts infiltrating immune cell heterogeneity in the tumor microenvironment of stage IA non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Jin Duan; Guoli Lv; Nanye Zhu; Xin Chen; Yang Shao; Yong Liu; Wei Zhao; Yunfei Shi
Journal:  Thorac Cancer       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 3.500

Review 3.  Immunotherapy for EGFR-mutant advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: Current status, possible mechanisms and application prospects.

Authors:  Chunyan Shi; Yan Wang; Jianxin Xue; Xiaojuan Zhou
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 8.786

4.  Targeting Glutamine Metabolism to Enhance Immunoprevention of EGFR-Driven Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Mofei Huang; Donghai Xiong; Jing Pan; Qi Zhang; Shizuko Sei; Robert H Shoemaker; Ronald A Lubet; Luis M Montuenga; Yian Wang; Barbara S Slusher; Ming You
Journal:  Adv Sci (Weinh)       Date:  2022-07-21       Impact factor: 17.521

5.  Qingfei Jiedu decoction inhibits PD-L1 expression in lung adenocarcinoma based on network pharmacology analysis, molecular docking and experimental verification.

Authors:  Junjie Pan; Hongkuan Yang; Lihong Zhu; Yafang Lou; Bo Jin
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-08-22       Impact factor: 5.988

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.