| Literature DB >> 32500228 |
Mitsuhiro Yano1, Shinji Okazaki2, Ichiro Kawamura2, Shunichiro Ito2, Shintaro Nozu2, Yuya Ashitomi2, Takefumi Suzuki2, Yukinori Kamio2, Osamu Hachiya2.
Abstract
PURPOSE: In the present study, we focused on the accessory middle colic artery and aimed to increase the safety and curative value of colorectal cancer surgery by investigating the artery course and branching patterns.Entities:
Keywords: Colorectal cancer; Inferior mesenteric artery; Laparoscopic surgery; Middle colic artery; Splenic flexure; Transverse colon
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32500228 PMCID: PMC7644475 DOI: 10.1007/s00276-020-02511-w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Surg Radiol Anat ISSN: 0930-1038 Impact factor: 1.246
Patient background (n = 143)
| Parameter | |
|---|---|
| Agea (years) | 70.4 ± 11.2 |
| Sex | |
| Male/female | 86/57 |
| Tumor localization | |
| Vermiform appendix/cecum/ascending colon/transverse colon/descending colon | 1/16/29/17/4 |
| Sigmoid colon/rectosigmoid/upper rectum/lower rectum | 27/16/19/14 |
| Surgical procedure | |
| Ileocecal resection/right hemicolectomy/left hemicolectomy | 32/26/2 |
| Partial colectomy/sigmoid colectomy/high anterior resection | 6/20/13 |
| Low anterior resection/proctectomy/Hartmann’s procedure | 20/09/2012 |
| Radical large bowel resection/total pelvic exteneration | 01/2 |
| Method of attainment | |
| Laparotomy/laparoscope | 46/97 |
| Level of lymph node dissection | |
| D0b/D1c/D2d/D3e | 1/10/56/76 |
| Pathological diagnosis | |
| Malignant/benign | 138/5 |
| pStage | |
| Benign or 0/I/II/IIIa/IIIb/IV | 11/41/42/29/9/11 |
aMean value ± standard deviation
bD0: none
cD1: dissection of the peri-intestinal lymph nodes
dD2: dissection of the peri-intestinal lymph nodes and intermediate lymph nodes
eD3: dissection of the regional lymph nodes
Fig. 1Fusion images of the large intestine and blood vessels. a Anterior view. b Lateral view
Fig. 2Accessory middle colic artery (blue line), present in 48.9% of cases (70/143). a Arising from the superior mesenteric artery: 47 cases (67.1%; 32.9% of total). b Arising from the inferior mesenteric artery: 21 cases (30%; 14.9% of total). c Arising from the celiac artery: two cases (2.9%; 1.4% of total). SMA superior mesenteric artery, IMA inferior mesenteric artery, CA celiac artery
Fig. 3The inferior mesenteric vein and accompanying artery. a Type A-1 (accompanied by the left colic artery): 92 cases (81.4%; 64.3% of total). b Type A-2 (accompanied by the accessory middle colic artery): 11 cases (9.8%; 7.7% of total). c Type A-3 (accompanied by an artery which divides and becomes the left colic artery and accessory middle colic artery): 10 cases (8.8%; 7% of total). d Type B (no accompanying artery): 21.8% (31/143). IMA inferior mesenteric artery, IMV inferior mesenteric artery, LCA left colic artery, AMCA accessory middle colic artery