Literature DB >> 32500207

The patient needs assessment in cancer care: identifying barriers and facilitators to implementation in the UK and Canada.

Susan Williamson1, Thomas F Hack2, Munirah Bangee3, Valerio Benedetto3, Kinta Beaver3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Personalised information and support can be provided to cancer survivors using a structured approach. Needs assessment tools such as the Holistic Needs Assessment (HNA) in the UK and the Comprehensive Problem and Symptom Screening (COMPASS) questionnaire in Canada are recommended for use in practice; however, they are not widely embedded into practice. The study aimed to determine the extent to which nurses working in cancer care in the UK and Manitoba value NA and identify any barriers and facilitators they experience.
METHOD: Oncology nurses involved in the care of cancer patients in the UK (n = 110) and Manitoba (n = 221) were emailed a link to an online survey by lead cancer nurses in the participating institutions. A snowball technique was used to increase participation across the UK resulting in 306 oncology nurses completing the survey in the UK and 116 in Canada.
RESULTS: Participants expressed concerns that these assessments were becoming bureaucratic "tick-box exercises" which did not meet patients' needs. Barriers to completion were time, staff shortages, lack of confidence, privacy, and resources. Facilitators were privacy for confidential discussions, training, confidence in knowledge and skills, and referral to resources.
CONCLUSION: Many busy oncology nurses completed this survey demonstrating the importance they attach to HNAs and COMPASS. The challenges faced with implementing these assessments into everyday practice require training, time, support services, and an appropriate environment. It is vital that the HNA and COMPASS are conducted at optimum times for patients to fully utilise time and resources.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COMPASS; Cancer; Cancer survivorship; Holistic needs assessment; Recovery package

Year:  2020        PMID: 32500207      PMCID: PMC7767902          DOI: 10.1007/s00520-020-05542-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Support Care Cancer        ISSN: 0941-4355            Impact factor:   3.603


  16 in total

1.  Telephone follow-up after treatment for breast cancer: views and experiences of patients and specialist breast care nurses.

Authors:  Kinta Beaver; Susan Williamson; Karen Chalmers
Journal:  J Clin Nurs       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.036

2.  Improving the care of cancer patients: holistic needs assessment.

Authors:  Jenny Young; Audrey Cund; Marian Renshaw; Angela Quigley; Austyn Snowden
Journal:  Br J Nurs       Date:  2015 Feb 26-Mar 11

3.  A commentary on 'effects of screening for psychological distress on patient outcomes in cancer: a systematic review'.

Authors:  Barry D Bultz; Linda E Carlson
Journal:  J Psychosom Res       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 3.006

4.  Psychosocial outcomes in active treatment through survivorship.

Authors:  Sarah C Reed; Janice F Bell; Robin Whitney; Rebecca Lash; Katherine K Kim; Richard J Bold; Jill G Joseph
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 3.894

5.  Implementing screening for distress, the 6th vital sign: a Canadian strategy for changing practice.

Authors:  Barry D Bultz; Shannon L Groff; Margaret Fitch; Marie Claude Blais; Janice Howes; Karen Levy; Carole Mayer
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 3.894

Review 6.  Screening for distress and unmet needs in patients with cancer: review and recommendations.

Authors:  Linda E Carlson; Amy Waller; Alex J Mitchell
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-03-12       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Cancer prevalence in the United Kingdom: estimates for 2008.

Authors:  J Maddams; D Brewster; A Gavin; J Steward; J Elliott; M Utley; H Møller
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-06-30       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  Distress, concerns and unmet needs in survivors of head and neck cancer: a cross-sectional survey.

Authors:  M Wells; M Cunningham; H Lang; S Swartzman; J Philp; L Taylor; J Thomson
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Care (Engl)       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 2.520

9.  Patient experiences of nurse-led telephone follow-up following treatment for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Susan Williamson; Karen Chalmers; Kinta Beaver
Journal:  Eur J Oncol Nurs       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 2.398

10.  Is seeing a specialist nurse associated with positive experiences of care? The role and value of specialist nurses in prostate cancer care.

Authors:  Carolyn Tarrant; Paul Sinfield; Shona Agarwal; Richard Baker
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2008-03-27       Impact factor: 2.655

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  What is the evidence behind cancer care reviews, a primary care cancer support tool? A scoping review.

Authors:  Dipesh P Gopal; Tahania Ahmad; Nikolaos Efstathiou; Ping Guo; Stephanie J C Taylor
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2022-09-06       Impact factor: 4.062

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.