Hiram Shaish1, Andrew Aukerman2, Rami Vanguri2, Antonino Spinelli3,4, Paul Armenta5, Sachin Jambawalikar6, Jasnit Makkar6, Stuart Bentley-Hibbert6, Armando Del Portillo2, Ravi Kiran7, Lara Monti4, Christiana Bonifacio8, Margarita Kirienko3, Kevin L Gardner2, Lawrence Schwartz6, Deborah Keller7. 1. Department of Radiology, Columbia University Medical Center, 630 West 168th Street, New York, NY, 10016, USA. hs2926@cumc.columbia.edu. 2. Department of Pathology, Columbia University Medical Center, 630 West 168th Street, New York, NY, 10016, USA. 3. Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Manzoni, 113 20089, Rozzano, Milano, Italy. 4. Division Colon and Rectal Surgery Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS -, Via Manzoni, 56 20089, Rozzano, Milano, Italy. 5. , New York, NY, USA. 6. Department of Radiology, Columbia University Medical Center, 630 West 168th Street, New York, NY, 10016, USA. 7. Department of Surgery, Columbia University Medical Center, 630 West 168th Street, New York, NY, 10016, USA. 8. Division of Radiology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Via Manzoni, 56 20089, Rozzano, Milano, Italy.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether pretreatment MRI-based radiomics of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) and/or the surrounding mesorectal compartment (MC) can predict pathologic complete response (pCR), neoadjuvant rectal (NAR) score, and tumor regression grade (TRG). METHODS: One hundred thirty-two consecutive patients with LARC who underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiation and total mesorectal excision (TME) were retrospectively collected from 2 centers in the USA and Italy. The primary tumor and surrounding MC were segmented on the best available T2-weighted sequence (axial, coronal, or sagittal). Three thousand one hundred ninety radiomic features were extracted using a python package. The most salient radiomic features as well as MRI parameter and clinical-based features were selected using recursive feature elimination. A logistic regression classifier was built to distinguish between any 2 binned categories in the considered endpoints: pCR, NAR, and TRG. Repeated k-fold validation was performed and AUCs calculated. RESULTS: There were 24, 87, and 21 T4, T3, and T2 LARCs, respectively (median age 63 years, 32 to 86). For NAR and TRG, the best classification performance was obtained using both the tumor and MC segmentations. The AUCs for classifying NAR 0 versus 2, pCR, and TRG 0/1 versus 2/3 were 0.66 (95% CI, 0.60-0.71), 0.80 (95% CI, 0.74-0.85), and 0.80 (95% CI, 0.77-0.82), respectively. CONCLUSION: Radiomics of pretreatment MRIs can predict pCR, TRG, and NAR score in patients with LARC undergoing neoadjuvant treatment and TME with moderate accuracy despite extremely heterogenous image data. Both the tumor and MC contain important prognostic information. KEY POINTS: • Machine learning of rectal cancer on images from the pretreatment MRI can predict important patient outcomes with moderate accuracy. • The tumor and the tissue around it both contain important prognostic information.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether pretreatment MRI-based radiomics of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) and/or the surrounding mesorectal compartment (MC) can predict pathologic complete response (pCR), neoadjuvant rectal (NAR) score, and tumor regression grade (TRG). METHODS: One hundred thirty-two consecutive patients with LARC who underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiation and total mesorectal excision (TME) were retrospectively collected from 2 centers in the USA and Italy. The primary tumor and surrounding MC were segmented on the best available T2-weighted sequence (axial, coronal, or sagittal). Three thousand one hundred ninety radiomic features were extracted using a python package. The most salient radiomic features as well as MRI parameter and clinical-based features were selected using recursive feature elimination. A logistic regression classifier was built to distinguish between any 2 binned categories in the considered endpoints: pCR, NAR, and TRG. Repeated k-fold validation was performed and AUCs calculated. RESULTS: There were 24, 87, and 21 T4, T3, and T2 LARCs, respectively (median age 63 years, 32 to 86). For NAR and TRG, the best classification performance was obtained using both the tumor and MC segmentations. The AUCs for classifying NAR 0 versus 2, pCR, and TRG 0/1 versus 2/3 were 0.66 (95% CI, 0.60-0.71), 0.80 (95% CI, 0.74-0.85), and 0.80 (95% CI, 0.77-0.82), respectively. CONCLUSION: Radiomics of pretreatment MRIs can predict pCR, TRG, and NAR score in patients with LARC undergoing neoadjuvant treatment and TME with moderate accuracy despite extremely heterogenous image data. Both the tumor and MC contain important prognostic information. KEY POINTS: • Machine learning of rectal cancer on images from the pretreatment MRI can predict important patient outcomes with moderate accuracy. • The tumor and the tissue around it both contain important prognostic information.
Entities:
Keywords:
Machine learning; Magnetic resonance imaging; Neoadjuvant therapy; Rectal cancer
Authors: Mustafa Bektaş; Jurriaan B Tuynman; Jaime Costa Pereira; George L Burchell; Donald L van der Peet Journal: World J Surg Date: 2022-09-15 Impact factor: 3.282
Authors: Iram Shahzadi; Alex Zwanenburg; Annika Lattermann; Annett Linge; Christian Baldus; Jan C Peeken; Stephanie E Combs; Markus Diefenhardt; Claus Rödel; Simon Kirste; Anca-Ligia Grosu; Michael Baumann; Mechthild Krause; Esther G C Troost; Steffen Löck Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2022-06-17 Impact factor: 4.996
Authors: Mustafa Bektaş; Beata M M Reiber; Jaime Costa Pereira; George L Burchell; Donald L van der Peet Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2022-06-17 Impact factor: 3.479
Authors: Joao Miranda; Gary Xia Vern Tan; Maria Clara Fernandes; Onur Yildirim; John A Sims; Jose de Arimateia Batista Araujo-Filho; Felipe Augusto de M Machado; Antonildes N Assuncao-Jr; Cesar Higa Nomura; Natally Horvat Journal: Clin Imaging Date: 2021-11-16 Impact factor: 2.420
Authors: Kent J Peterson; Matthew T Simpson; Melissa K Drezdzon; Aniko Szabo; Robin A Ausman; Andrew S Nencka; Paul M Knechtges; Carrie Y Peterson; Kirk A Ludwig; Timothy J Ridolfi Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2022-10-21 Impact factor: 3.267
Authors: Vetri Sudar Jayaprakasam; Viktoriya Paroder; Peter Gibbs; Raazi Bajwa; Natalie Gangai; Ramon E Sosa; Iva Petkovska; Jennifer S Golia Pernicka; James Louis Fuqua; David D B Bates; Martin R Weiser; Andrea Cercek; Marc J Gollub Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2021-07-29 Impact factor: 7.034
Authors: Andrea Delli Pizzi; Antonio Maria Chiarelli; Piero Chiacchiaretta; Martina d'Annibale; Pierpaolo Croce; Consuelo Rosa; Domenico Mastrodicasa; Stefano Trebeschi; Doenja Marina Johanna Lambregts; Daniele Caposiena; Francesco Lorenzo Serafini; Raffaella Basilico; Giulio Cocco; Pierluigi Di Sebastiano; Sebastiano Cinalli; Antonio Ferretti; Richard Geoffrey Wise; Domenico Genovesi; Regina G H Beets-Tan; Massimo Caulo Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-03-08 Impact factor: 4.996