Literature DB >> 32500123

Cell adhesion and proliferation on common 3D printing materials used in stereolithography of microfluidic devices.

Kati Piironen1, Markus Haapala, Virpi Talman, Päivi Järvinen, Tiina Sikanen.   

Abstract

Three-dimensional (3D) printing has recently emerged as a cost-effective alternative for rapid prototyping of microfluidic devices. The feature resolution of stereolithography-based 3D printing is particularly well suited for manufacturing of continuous flow cell culture platforms. Poor cell adhesion or material-induced cell death may, however, limit the introduction of new materials to microfluidic cell culture. In this work, we characterized four commercially available materials commonly used in stereolithography-based 3D printing with respect to long-term (2 month) cell survival on native 3D printed surfaces. Cell proliferation rates, along with material-induced effects on apoptosis and cell survival, were examined in mouse embryonic fibroblasts. Additionally, the feasibility of Dental SG (material with the most favored properties) for culturing of human hepatocytes and human-induced pluripotent stem cells was evaluated. The strength of cell adhesion to Dental SG was further examined over a shear force gradient of 1-89 dyne per cm2 by using a custom-designed microfluidic shear force assay incorporating a 3D printed, tilted and tapered microchannel sealed with a polydimethylsiloxane lid. According to our results, autoclavation of the devices prior to cell seeding played the most important role in facilitating long-term cell survival on the native 3D printed surfaces with the shear force threshold in the range of 3-8 dyne per cm2.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32500123     DOI: 10.1039/d0lc00114g

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lab Chip        ISSN: 1473-0189            Impact factor:   6.799


  5 in total

Review 1.  Fabrication of Polymer Microfluidics: An Overview.

Authors:  Yi-Je Juang; Yu-Jui Chiu
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 4.967

2.  Automated calibration of 3D-printed microfluidic devices based on computer vision.

Authors:  Junchao Wang; Kaicong Liang; Naiyin Zhang; Hailong Yao; Tsung-Yi Ho; Lingling Sun
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 2.800

3.  PDMS Curing Inhibition on 3D-Printed Molds: Why? Also, How to Avoid It?

Authors:  Bastien Venzac; Shanliang Deng; Ziad Mahmoud; Aufried Lenferink; Aurélie Costa; Fabrice Bray; Cees Otto; Christian Rolando; Séverine Le Gac
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 6.986

Review 4.  Can 3D Printing Bring Droplet Microfluidics to Every Lab?-A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Nafisat Gyimah; Ott Scheler; Toomas Rang; Tamas Pardy
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 2.891

5.  Mechanical Properties, Cytotoxicity, and Fluoride Ion Release Capacity of Bioactive Glass-Modified Methacrylate Resin Used in Three-Dimensional Printing Technology.

Authors:  Zbigniew Raszewski; Julita Kulbacka; Agnieszka Nowakowska-Toporowska
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 3.623

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.