Literature DB >> 32499387

Updated Strategies for Pulse Oximetry Screening for Critical Congenital Heart Disease.

Gerard R Martin1, Andrew K Ewer2, Amy Gaviglio3, Lisa A Hom4, Annamarie Saarinen5, Marci Sontag6, Kristin M Burns4,2,7, Alex R Kemper8, Matthew E Oster9.   

Abstract

Seven years after its addition to the US Recommended Uniform Screening Panel, newborn screening for critical congenital heart disease (CCHD) using pulse oximetry became mandatory in the United States. Although CCHD newborn screening reduces morbidity and mortality, there remain important opportunities to improve. An expert panel convened for a 1-day meeting in September 2018, including subject matter experts and representatives from stakeholder organizations. Presentations on CCHD outcomes, variations in approach to screening, and data and quality improvement helped identify improvement opportunities. The expert panel concluded that sufficient evidence exists to recommend modifying the current American Academy of Pediatrics algorithm by (1) requiring an oxygen saturation of at least 95% in both (formerly either) the upper and lower extremities to pass and (2) requiring only 1 repeat screen instead of 2 for cases that neither pass nor fail initially. The panel underscored the importance of improving public health reporting by further specifying the targets of screening and criteria for reporting outcomes (false-negative and false-positive cases). The panel also highlighted the need to ensure sufficient public health funding for CCHD newborn screening and opportunities for education and global implementation. Newborn screening for CCHD using pulse oximetry has led to significant improvements in child health outcomes. However, further important work is required to understand and improve the effectiveness and efficiency of screening.
Copyright © 2019 by the American Academy of Pediatrics.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32499387     DOI: 10.1542/peds.2019-1650

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatrics        ISSN: 0031-4005            Impact factor:   7.124


  9 in total

1.  Enhanced Critical Congenital Cardiac Disease Screening by Combining Interpretable Machine Learning Algorithms.

Authors:  Zhengfeng Lai; Pranjali Vadlaputi; Daniel J Tancredi; Meena Garg; Robert I Koppel; Mera Goodman; Whitnee Hogan; Nicole Cresalia; Stephan Juergensen; Erlinda Manalo; Satyan Lakshminrusimha; Chen-Nee Chuah; Heather Siefkes
Journal:  Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2021-11

2.  Lessons Learned from Infants with Late Detection of Critical Congenital Heart Disease.

Authors:  Gerard R Martin; Bryanna N Schwartz; Lisa A Hom; Mary T Donofrio
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2021-10-28       Impact factor: 1.655

3.  Prevalence of critical congenital heart defects and selected co-occurring congenital anomalies, 2014-2018: A U.S. population-based study.

Authors:  Erin Bugenske Stallings; Jennifer L Isenburg; Deepa Aggarwal; Philip J Lupo; Matthew E Oster; Hanna Shephard; Rebecca F Liberman; Russell S Kirby; Eirini Nestoridi; Brenda Hansen; Xiaoyi Shan; Maria Luisa Navarro Sanchez; Aubree Boyce; Dominique Heinke
Journal:  Birth Defects Res       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 2.661

4.  Brain tissue development of neonates with Congenital Septal Defect: Study on MRI Image Evaluation of Deep Learning Algorithm.

Authors:  Jianfei Zhu; Jiaolei Chen; Yunhui Zhang; Jianwei Ji
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 1.088

5.  Effect of preoperative pulse oximeter oxygen saturation on postoperative prolonged mechanical ventilation in patients with tetralogy of Fallot.

Authors:  Xie Wu; Ran An; Qipeng Luo; Yinan Li; Hongbai Wang; Qiao Liu; Jiangshan Huang; Yuan Jia; Su Yuan; Fuxia Yan
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-08-22

6.  Population-Based Screening of Newborns: Findings From the NBS Expansion Study (Part One).

Authors:  Amy Brower; Kee Chan; Marc Williams; Susan Berry; Robert Currier; Piero Rinaldo; Michele Caggana; Amy Gaviglio; William Wilcox; Robert Steiner; Ingrid A Holm; Jennifer Taylor; Joseph J Orsini; Luca Brunelli; Joanne Adelberg; Olaf Bodamer; Sarah Viall; Curt Scharfe; Melissa Wasserstein; Jin Y Chen; Maria Escolar; Aaron Goldenberg; Kathryn Swoboda; Can Ficicioglu; Dieter Matern; Rachel Lee; Michael Watson
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 4.772

7.  Lower pass threshold (≥93%) for critical congenital heart disease screening at high altitude prevents repeat screening and reduces false positives.

Authors:  M Rhonda Sneeringer; Pranjali Vadlaputi; Satyan Lakshminrusimha; Heather Siefkes
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2022-08-17       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Automated identification of innocent Still's murmur using a convolutional neural network.

Authors:  Raj Shekhar; Ganesh Vanama; Titus John; James Issac; Youness Arjoune; Robin W Doroshow
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2022-09-21       Impact factor: 3.569

9.  Critical Congenital Heart Disease Detection in the Screening Era: Do Not Neglect the Examination!

Authors:  Deepika Sankaran; Heather Siefkes; Frank F Ing; Satyan Lakshminrusimha; Francis R Poulain
Journal:  AJP Rep       Date:  2021-06-16
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.