| Literature DB >> 32499305 |
Matteo Bonini1,2, Marcello Di Paolo1, Diego Bagnasco3, Ilaria Baiardini4, Fulvio Braido3, Marco Caminati5,6, Elisiana Carpagnano7, Marco Contoli8, Angelo Corsico9, Stefano Del Giacco10, Enrico Heffler11, Carlo Lombardi12, Ilaria Menichini13, Manlio Milanese14, Nicola Scichilone15, Gianenrico Senna5,6, Giorgio W Canonica11.
Abstract
Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) can be defined as the smallest change or difference in an outcome measure that is perceived as beneficial and would lead to a change in the patient's medical management.The aim of the current expert consensus report is to provide a "state-of-the-art" review of the currently available literature evidence about MCID for end-points to monitor asthma control, in order to facilitate optimal disease management and identify unmet needs in the field to guide future research.A series of MCID cut-offs are currently available in literature and validated among populations of asthmatic patients, with most of the evidence focusing on outcomes as patient reported outcomes, lung function and exercise tolerance. On the contrary, only scant and partial data are available for inflammatory biomarkers. These clearly represent the most interesting target for future development in diagnosis and clinical management of asthma, particularly in view of the several biologic drugs in the pipeline, for which regulatory agencies will soon require personalised proof of efficacy and treatment response predictors.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32499305 DOI: 10.1183/16000617.0137-2019
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur Respir Rev ISSN: 0905-9180