| Literature DB >> 32499268 |
Megan Doheny1, Janne Agerholm2, Nicola Orsini3, Pär Schön2, Bo Burström3.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the association between the implementation of an integrated care (IC) system in Norrtälje municipality and changes in trends of the rate of emergency department (ED) visits.Entities:
Keywords: Norrtälje model; emergency department visits; integrated care; time series analysis
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32499268 PMCID: PMC7279653 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036182
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMJ Open ISSN: 2044-6055 Impact factor: 2.692
Figure 1Overview of the timeline of the implementation of IC in Norrtälje. IC, integrated care; PHC, primary healthcare.
Figure 2The trend in the rate of ED visits among all inhabitants 65+ years in Norrtälje from 2000q1 to 2015q4. The circles represent the observed rate of ED visits per 10 000 persons, the vertical line represents the implementation of integrated care (IC) (postintervention trend from 2006q1). The solid line represents the temporal trend, and the step at the postintervention period is the estimated effect and the dashed red line represents the counterfactual trend if IC was not implemented in Norrtälje. ED, emergency department.
The trend changes in the rate of ED visits associated with the implementation of IC in Norrtälje between 2000 and 2015
| Rate of ED visits per quarter per 10 000 population | Age adjusted rate of ED visits per quarter per 10 000 population | Level change (immediately following the intervention) | Trend change | |||||
| Before | After | Before | After | IRR (95% CI) | P value | IRR (95% CI) | P value | |
| All inhabitants | 1503.5 | 1562.7 | 1478.84 | 1584.17 | 0.996 (0.971 to 1.022) | 0.793 | 0.997 (0.995 to 0.998) | 0.000 |
| Males | 1627.0 | 1620.4 | 1674.5 | 1728.0 | 0.959 (0.937 to 0.983) | 0.001 | 0.997 (0.995 to 0.998) | 0.000 |
| Females | 1499.5 | 1510.6 | 1336.6 | 1493.6 | 1.036 (1.009 to 1.064) | 0.008 | 0.995 (0.994 to 0.998) | 0.000 |
| 65–79 years | 1218.1 | 1287.5 | 822.7 | 891.5 | 1.037 (1.003 to 1.073) | 0.034 | 0.995 (0.993 to 0.997) | 0.000 |
| 80+ years | 2145.8 | 2298.3 | 660.05 | 700.57 | 0.946 (0.911 to 0.983) | 0.005 | 0.998 (0.996 to 1.00) | 0.323 |
| Lowest income | 1582.2 | 1593.0 | 1449.6 | 1553.1 | 0.941 (0.917 to 0.965) | 0.000 | 0.996 (0.994 to 0.997) | 0.000 |
| Living alone | 1650.3 | 1764.4 | 1538.2 | 1676.6 | 0.987 (0.963 to 1.011) | 0.301 | 0.996 (0.995 to 0.998) | 0.000 |
| Born outside of Sweden | 1452.4 | 1683.0 | 1591.5 | 1748.0 | 0.872 (0.852 to 0.894) | 0.000 | 0.991 (0.989 to 0.992) | 0.000 |
The step change the level change immediately after the implementation of IC.
The trend change in the rate of ED visits in the postintervention period.
ED, emergency department; IC, integrated care; IRR, incidence rate ratio.
Figure 3The trend in the rate of ED visits among the inhabitants 65+ years in the rest of Stockholm County from 2000q1 to 2015q4. The circles represent the observed rate of ED visits per 10 000 persons, the vertical line represents the point where integrated care (IC) was implemented in Norrtälje. The solid line represents the temporal trend, and the step at the postintervention period is the estimated effect and the dashed red line represents the counterfactual trend if IC was not implemented in Norrtälje. ED, emergency department.