Literature DB >> 32498802

Prognostic Value of Magnetic Resonance Phenotype in Patients With Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy.

Giovanni Donato Aquaro1, Antonio De Luca2, Chiara Cappelletto2, Francesca Raimondi3, Francesco Bianco4, Nicoletta Botto5, Pierluigi Lesizza2, Crysanthos Grigoratos5, Monia Minati6, Matteo Dell'Omodarme7, Alessandro Pingitore8, Davide Stolfo2, Matteo Dal Ferro2, Marco Merlo2, Gianluca Di Bella9, Gianfranco Sinagra2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) is widely used to assess tissue and functional abnormalities in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC). Recently, a ARVC risk score was proposed to predict the 5-year risk of malignant ventricular arrhythmias in patients with ARVC. However, CMR features such as fibrosis, fat infiltration, and left ventricular (LV) involvement were not considered.
OBJECTIVES: The authors sought to evaluate the prognostic role of CMR phenotype in patients with definite ARVC and to evaluate the effectiveness of the novel 5-year ARVC risk score to predict cardiac events in different CMR presentations.
METHODS: A total of 140 patients with definite ARVC were enrolled (mean age 42 ± 17 years, 97 males) in this multicenter prospective registry. As per study design, CMR was performed in all the patients at enrollment. The novel 5-year ARVC risk score was retrospectively calculated using the patient's characteristics at the time of enrollment. During a median follow-up of 5 years (2 to 8 years), the combined endpoint of sudden cardiac death, appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator intervention, and aborted cardiac arrest was considered.
RESULTS: CMR was completely negative in 14 patients (10%), isolated right ventricular (RV) involvement was found in 58 (41%), biventricular in 52 (37%), and LV dominant in 16 (12%). During the follow-up, 48 patients (34%) had major events, but none occurred in patients with negative CMR. At Kaplan-Meier analysis, patients with LV involvement (LV dominant and biventricular) had a worse prognosis than those with lone RV (p < 0.0001). At multivariate analysis, the LV involvement, a LV-dominant phenotype, and the 5-year ARVC risk score were independent predictors of major events. The estimated 5-year risk was able to predict the observed risk in patients with lone RV but underestimated the risk in those with LV involvement.
CONCLUSIONS: Different CMR presentations of ARVC are associated with different prognoses. The 5-year ARVC risk score is valid for the estimation of risk in patients with lone-RV presentation but underestimated the risk when LV is involved.
Copyright © 2020 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ARVC risk score; arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy; cardiac magnetic resonance; left dominant; prognosis

Year:  2020        PMID: 32498802     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.04.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  16 in total

Review 1.  Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging of arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy: evolving diagnostic perspectives.

Authors:  Alberto Cipriani; Giulia Mattesi; Riccardo Bariani; Annagrazia Cecere; Nicolò Martini; Laura De Michieli; Stefano Da Pozzo; Simone Corradin; Giorgio De Conti; Alessandro Zorzi; Raffaella Motta; Manuel De Lazzari; Barbara Bauce; Sabino Iliceto; Cristina Basso; Domenico Corrado; Martina Perazzolo Marra
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2022-07-05       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Prevalence and clinical correlates of exercise-induced ventricular arrhythmias in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Gherardo Finocchiaro; Barbara Barra; Silvia Molaro; Mattia Zampieri; Laura Monje-Garcia; Colin Evans; Andrea Ermolao; Georgios Georgiopoulos; Nabeel Sheikh; Rachel Bastiaenen; Leema Roberts; Pier-Giorgio Masci; Dan Sado; Amedeo Chiribiri; Gerald Carr-White
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2021-09-04       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 3.  Clinical application of CMR in cardiomyopathies: evolving concepts and techniques : A position paper of myocardial and pericardial diseases and cardiac magnetic resonance working groups of Italian society of cardiology.

Authors:  Marco Merlo; Giulia Gagno; Anna Baritussio; Barbara Bauce; Elena Biagini; Marco Canepa; Alberto Cipriani; Silvia Castelletti; Santo Dellegrottaglie; Andrea Igoren Guaricci; Massimo Imazio; Giuseppe Limongelli; Maria Beatrice Musumeci; Vanda Parisi; Silvia Pica; Gianluca Pontone; Giancarlo Todiere; Camilla Torlasco; Cristina Basso; Gianfranco Sinagra; Pasquale Perrone Filardi; Ciro Indolfi; Camillo Autore; Andrea Barison
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2022-05-10       Impact factor: 4.654

4.  Arrhythmogenic left ventricular cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Domenico Corrado; Cristina Basso
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2021-07-13       Impact factor: 5.994

5.  Left Ventricular Dysfunction in Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy (ARVC): Can We Separate ARVC From Other Arrhythmogenic Cardiomyopathies?

Authors:  Stephan Altmayer; Saman Nazarian; Yuchi Han
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2020-11-21       Impact factor: 5.501

Review 6.  Risk Stratification in Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Ryan Wallace; Hugh Calkins
Journal:  Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev       Date:  2021-04

7.  Ventricular arrhythmia management in patients with genetic cardiomyopathies.

Authors:  Zain I Sharif; Steven A Lubitz
Journal:  Heart Rhythm O2       Date:  2021-12-17

8.  Left Ventricular Longitudinal Dyssynchrony by CMR Feature Tracking Is Related to Adverse Prognosis in Advanced Arrhythmogenic Cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Yanyan Song; Lu Li; Xiuyu Chen; Keshan Ji; Minjie Lu; Richard Hauer; Liang Chen; Shihua Zhao
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2021-10-11

9.  Comparison of different prediction models for the indication of implanted cardioverter defibrillator in patients with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Giovanni Donato Aquaro; Antonio De Luca; Chiara Cappelletto; Francesca Raimondi; Francesco Bianco; Nicoletta Botto; Andrea Barison; Simona Romani; Pierluigi Lesizza; Enrico Fabris; Giancarlo Todiere; Crysanthos Grigoratos; Alessandro Pingitore; Davide Stolfo; Matteo Dal Ferro; Marco Merlo; Gianluca Di Bella; Gianfranco Sinagra
Journal:  ESC Heart Fail       Date:  2020-09-23

10.  Endomyocardial Biopsy: The Forgotten Piece in the Arrhythmogenic Cardiomyopathy Puzzle.

Authors:  Michela Casella; Marco Bergonti; Antonio Dello Russo; Riccardo Maragna; Alessio Gasperetti; Paolo Compagnucci; Valentina Catto; Filippo Trombara; Antonio Frappampina; Edoardo Conte; Marco Fogante; Elena Sommariva; Stefania Rizzo; Monica De Gaspari; Andrea Giovagnoni; Daniele Andreini; Giulio Pompilio; Luigi Di Biase; Andrea Natale; Cristina Basso; Claudio Tondo
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2021-09-25       Impact factor: 5.501

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.