| Literature DB >> 32498470 |
Syed Tauseef Mohyud-Din1, Umar Khan2, Naveed Ahmed3, Ilyas Khan4, T Abdeljawad5,6,7, Kottakkaran Sooppy Nisar8.
Abstract
Currently, thermal investigation in hybrid colloidal liquids is noteworthy. It has applications in medical sciences, drug delivery, computer chips, electronics, the paint industry, mechanical engineering and to perceive the cancer cell in human body and many more. Therefore, the study is carried out for 3D magnetized hybrid nanofluid by plugging the novel Cattaneo-Christov model and thermal radiations. The dimensionless version of the model is successfully handled via an analytical technique. From the reported analysis, it is examined that Graphene Oxide-molybdenum disulfide/C2H6O2-H2O has better heat transport characteristics and is therefore reliable for industrial and technological purposes. The temperature of Graphene Oxide GO-molybdenum disulfide/C2H6O2-H2O enhances in the presence of thermal relaxation parameter and radiative effects. Also, it is noted that rotational velocity of the hybrid nanofluid rises for stronger magnetic parameter effects. Moreover, prevailed behavior of thermal conductivity of GO-molybdenum disulfide/C2H6O2-H2O is detected which shows that hybrid nanofluids are a better conductor as compared to that of a regular nanofluid.Entities:
Keywords: Cattaneo–Christov heat flux model; GO-MoS2/C2H6O2-H2O hybrid nanofluid; magnetic field; thermal radiations; thermal transport; thermophysical characteristics
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32498470 PMCID: PMC7321313 DOI: 10.3390/molecules25112592
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Behavior of (a) and (b) against A*.
Figure 2Behavior of (a) and (b) against
Figure 3Behavior of (a) and (b) against M.
Figure 4Behavior of for M.
Figure 5Behavior of for (a) and (b) A*.
Figure 6Behavior of for (a) and (b) .
Figure 7Behavior of for Rd.
Figure 8Shear stresses against suction (a) S = 0.5 and (b) S =0.5.
Figure 9Shear stresses against (a) S =0.5 and (b) S = 0.5.
Figure 10Shear stresses against (a) S = 0.5 and (b) S =0.5.
Figure 11Contours for (a) M=0.3 and (b) M = 0.9.
Figure 12Contours for (a) A = 0.5 and (b) A = 1.0.
Figure 13Dynamic viscosity for GO-molybdenum disulfide/H2O-C2H6O2 and MoS2/H2O-C2H6O2.
Figure 14Density for GO-molybdenum disulfide/H2O-C2H6O2 and MoS2/H2O-C2H6O2.
Figure 15Electrical and thermal conductivities for GO-molybdenum disulfide/H2O-C2H6O2 and MoS2/H2O-C2H6O2.
Comparative analysis of current results with existing scientific study,
|
| A* |
| Present Results | [ | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Figure 16Hybrid model flow scenario.
Effective models for conventional and hybrid nanofluids.
|
| Properties |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| Density |
|
|
|
| Dynamic viscosity |
|
|
|
| Electrical conductivity |
|
|
|
| Thermal conductivity |
|
|
|
| Heat capacity |
|
|
|
| Thermal expansion coefficient |
|
|
Different shapes of tiny particles.
| Bricks | Cylinders | Platelets |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| Shape Factor for Bricks | Shape Factor for Cylinders | Shape Factor for Platelets |
|
|
|
|
The values of the thermophysical characteristics.
| Thermophysical Characteristics | Unit | Hybrid Fluid Phase | Nanomaterials | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|