Literature DB >> 32497385

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients with a history of cancer: Periprocedural and long-term outcomes.

Alexandra C Murphy1,2, Anoop N Koshy1,2, William Cameron1, Mark Horrigan1, Leighton Kearney1,2, Belinda Yeo3, Omar Farouque1,2, Matias B Yudi1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A history of cancer is incorporated into the surgical risk assessment of patients undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement through the Society for Thoracic Surgeons score. However, the prognostic significance of cancer in patients treated with transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is unclear. As the cancer survivorship population increases, it is imperative to establish the efficacy and safety of TAVR in patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis (AS) and a history of malignancy.
OBJECTIVES: The primary goal of this study was to assess the periprocedural outcomes and long-term mortality in patients with a history of cancer undergoing TAVR.
METHODS: A systematic review of PubMed, MEDLINE, and EMBASE was conducted to identify studies reporting outcomes in patients with a history of malignancy undergoing TAVR. A meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model with a primary outcome of all-cause mortality and cardiac mortality at the longest follow-up. On secondary analyses, procedural safety was assessed.
RESULTS: A total of 13 observational studies with 10,916 patients were identified in the systematic review. Seven studies including 6,323 patients were included in the quantitative analysis. Short-term mortality (relative risk [RR] 0.61, 95%CI 0.36-1.01; p = .06) and long-term all-cause mortality (RR 1.24, 95%CI 0.95-1.63; p = .11) were not significantly different when comparing patients with and without a history of cancer. No significant difference in the rate of periprocedural complications including stroke, bleeding, acute kidney injury, and pacemaker implantation was noted.
CONCLUSION: In patients with severe AS undergoing TAVR, a history of cancer was not associated with adverse short or long-term survival. Based on these findings, TAVR should be considered in all patients with severe symptomatic AS, irrespective of their history of malignancy.
© 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aortic valve disease; comparative effectiveness/patient-centered outcomes research; percutaneous intervention; transcatheter valve implantation

Year:  2020        PMID: 32497385     DOI: 10.1002/ccd.28969

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1522-1946            Impact factor:   2.692


  2 in total

1.  Mortality after transcatheter aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis among patients with malignancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Muhammad Umer Siddiqui; Omar Yacob; Joey Junarta; Ahmed K Pasha; Farouk Mookadam; Mamas A Mamas; David L Fischman
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2022-05-10       Impact factor: 2.298

2.  Impact of frailty on mortality and quality of life in patients with a history of cancer undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Nikitha Kosaraju; Perry Wu; Mei Leng; Marielle Bolano; Asim M Rafique; John Shen; Nancy Satou; Jeanne Huchting; Deena Goldwater; Olcay Aksoy; Eric H Yang
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2022-10-04       Impact factor: 3.287

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.