Literature DB >> 32497269

Signal quality and patient experience with wearable devices for epilepsy management.

Mona Nasseri1, Ewan Nurse2,3, Martin Glasstetter4, Sebastian Böttcher4, Nicholas M Gregg1, Aiswarya Laks Nandakumar5, Boney Joseph1, Tal Pal Attia1, Pedro F Viana6,7, Elisa Bruno6, Andrea Biondi6, Mark Cook3, Gregory A Worrell1, Andreas Schulze-Bonhage4, Matthias Dümpelmann4, Dean R Freestone2, Mark P Richardson6, Benjamin H Brinkmann1.   

Abstract

Noninvasive wearable devices have great potential to aid the management of epilepsy, but these devices must have robust signal quality, and patients must be willing to wear them for long periods of time. Automated machine learning classification of wearable biosensor signals requires quantitative measures of signal quality to automatically reject poor-quality or corrupt data segments. In this study, commercially available wearable sensors were placed on patients with epilepsy undergoing in-hospital or in-home electroencephalographic (EEG) monitoring, and healthy volunteers. Empatica E4 and Biovotion Everion were used to record accelerometry (ACC), photoplethysmography (PPG), and electrodermal activity (EDA). Byteflies Sensor Dots were used to record ACC and PPG, the Activinsights GENEActiv watch to record ACC, and Epitel Epilog to record EEG data. PPG and EDA signals were recorded for multiple days, then epochs of high-quality, marginal-quality, or poor-quality data were visually identified by reviewers, and reviewer annotations were compared to automated signal quality measures. For ACC, the ratio of spectral power from 0.8 to 5 Hz to broadband power was used to separate good-quality signals from noise. For EDA, the rate of amplitude change and prevalence of sharp peaks significantly differentiated between good-quality data and noise. Spectral entropy was used to assess PPG and showed significant differences between good-, marginal-, and poor-quality signals. EEG data were evaluated using methods to identify a spectral noise cutoff frequency. Patients were asked to rate the usability and comfort of each device in several categories. Patients showed a significant preference for the wrist-worn devices, and the Empatica E4 device was preferred most often. Current wearable devices can provide high-quality data and are acceptable for routine use, but continued development is needed to improve data quality, consistency, and management, as well as acceptability to patients.
© 2020 International League Against Epilepsy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  epilepsy; patient experience; signal quality; wearable devices

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32497269     DOI: 10.1111/epi.16527

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Epilepsia        ISSN: 0013-9580            Impact factor:   5.864


  10 in total

1.  Wearable Photoplethysmography for Cardiovascular Monitoring.

Authors:  Peter H Charlton; Panicos A Kyriaco; Jonathan Mant; Vaidotas Marozas; Phil Chowienczyk; Jordi Alastruey
Journal:  Proc IEEE Inst Electr Electron Eng       Date:  2022-03-11       Impact factor: 10.961

Review 2.  Autonomic manifestations of epilepsy: emerging pathways to sudden death?

Authors:  Roland D Thijs; Philippe Ryvlin; Rainer Surges
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2021-10-29       Impact factor: 42.937

Review 3.  The role of commercially available smartphone apps and wearable devices in monitoring patients after total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review.

Authors:  David Constantinescu; William Pavlis; Michael Rizzo; Dennis Vanden Berge; Spencer Barnhill; Victor Hugo Hernandez
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2022-07-05

4.  Intra- and Inter-Subject Perspectives on the Detection of Focal Onset Motor Seizures in Epilepsy Patients.

Authors:  Sebastian Böttcher; Elisa Bruno; Nino Epitashvili; Matthias Dümpelmann; Nicolas Zabler; Martin Glasstetter; Valentina Ticcinelli; Sarah Thorpe; Simon Lees; Kristof Van Laerhoven; Mark P Richardson; Andreas Schulze-Bonhage
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-26       Impact factor: 3.847

5.  Ambulatory seizure forecasting with a wrist-worn device using long-short term memory deep learning.

Authors:  Mona Nasseri; Tal Pal Attia; Boney Joseph; Nicholas M Gregg; Ewan S Nurse; Pedro F Viana; Gregory Worrell; Matthias Dümpelmann; Mark P Richardson; Dean R Freestone; Benjamin H Brinkmann
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-11-09       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Epilepsy Personal Assistant Device-A Mobile Platform for Brain State, Dense Behavioral and Physiology Tracking and Controlling Adaptive Stimulation.

Authors:  Tal Pal Attia; Daniel Crepeau; Vaclav Kremen; Mona Nasseri; Hari Guragain; Steven W Steele; Vladimir Sladky; Petr Nejedly; Filip Mivalt; Jeffrey A Herron; Matt Stead; Timothy Denison; Gregory A Worrell; Benjamin H Brinkmann
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2021-07-29       Impact factor: 4.003

7.  Interpretable EEG seizure prediction using a multiobjective evolutionary algorithm.

Authors:  Mauro Pinto; Tiago Coelho; Adriana Leal; Fábio Lopes; António Dourado; Pedro Martins; César Teixeira
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-15       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 8.  Modulation Spectral Signal Representation for Quality Measurement and Enhancement of Wearable Device Data: A Technical Note.

Authors:  Abhishek Tiwari; Raymundo Cassani; Shruti Kshirsagar; Diana P Tobon; Yi Zhu; Tiago H Falk
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 3.847

Review 9.  Cycles in epilepsy.

Authors:  Philippa J Karoly; Vikram R Rao; Maxime O Baud; Nicholas M Gregg; Gregory A Worrell; Christophe Bernard; Mark J Cook
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 42.937

10.  Remote Monitoring of Critically-Ill Post-Surgical Patients: Lessons from a Biosensor Implementation Trial.

Authors:  Mariana Restrepo; Ann Marie Huffenberger; C William Hanson; Michael Draugelis; Krzysztof Laudanski
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-18
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.