Anne W M Lee1,2, Roger K C Ngan2,3, Wai-Tong Ng4, Stewart Y Tung5, Ashley A C Cheng6, Dora L W Kwong2,7, Tai-Xiang Lu8, Anthony T C Chan9, Henry C K Sze4, Harry H Y Yiu3, Frank C S Wong5, Kam-Tong Yuen6, Rick Chappell10, Horace C W Choi2. 1. Department of Clinical Oncology, The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Guangdong, China. 2. Department of Clinical Oncology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong. 3. Department of Clinical Oncology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Hong Kong, Hong Kong. 4. Department of Clinical Oncology, Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital, Hong Kong, Hong Kong. 5. Department of Clinical Oncology, Tuen Mun Hospital, Hong Kong, Hong Kong. 6. Department of Clinical Oncology, Princess Margaret Hospital, Hong Kong, Hong Kong. 7. Department of Clinical Oncology, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong, Hong Kong. 8. Department of Clinical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China. 9. Department of Clinical Oncology, Prince of Wales Hospital, Hong Kong, Hong Kong. 10. Department of Biostatistics, University of Wisconsin Medical School, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: A current recommendation for the treatment of patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is conventional fractionated radiotherapy (RT) with concurrent cisplatin followed by adjuvant cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (PF). This randomized NPC-0501 trial evaluated the therapeutic effect of changing to an induction-concurrent sequence or accelerated-fractionation sequence, and/or replacing 5-fluorouracil with capecitabine (X). METHODS:Patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer/International Union Against Cancer stage III to stage IVB NPC initially were randomly allocated to 1 of 6 treatment arms (6-arm full-randomization cohort). The protocol was amended in 2009 to permit centers to opt out of randomization regarding fractionation (3-arm chemotherapy cohort). RESULTS:A total of 803 patients were accrued (1 of whom was nonevaluable) from 2006 to 2012. Based on the overall comparisons, neither changing the chemotherapy sequence nor accelerated fractionation improved treatment outcome. However, secondary analyses demonstrated that when adjusted for RT parameters and other significant factors, the induction-concurrent sequence, especially the induction-PX regimen, achieved significant improvements in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival. Efficacy varied among different RT groups: although no impact was observed in the accelerated-fractionation group and the 3-arm chemotherapy cohort, a comparison of the induction-concurrent versus concurrent-adjuvant sequence in the conventional-fractionation group demonstrated a significant benefit in PFS (78% vs 62% at 5 years; P = .015) and a marginal benefit in overall survival (84% vs 72%; P = .042) after adjusting for multiple comparisons. Comparison of the induction-PX versus the adjuvant-PF regimen demonstrated better PFS (78% vs 62%; P = .027) without an increase in overall late toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: For patients irradiated using conventional fractionation, changing the chemotherapy sequence from a concurrent-adjuvant to an induction-concurrent sequence, particularly using induction cisplatin and capecitabine, potentially could improve efficacy without an adverse impact on late toxicity. However, further validation is needed for confirmation of these findings.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: A current recommendation for the treatment of patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is conventional fractionated radiotherapy (RT) with concurrent cisplatin followed by adjuvant cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (PF). This randomized NPC-0501 trial evaluated the therapeutic effect of changing to an induction-concurrent sequence or accelerated-fractionation sequence, and/or replacing 5-fluorouracil with capecitabine (X). METHODS:Patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer/International Union Against Cancer stage III to stage IVB NPC initially were randomly allocated to 1 of 6 treatment arms (6-arm full-randomization cohort). The protocol was amended in 2009 to permit centers to opt out of randomization regarding fractionation (3-arm chemotherapy cohort). RESULTS: A total of 803 patients were accrued (1 of whom was nonevaluable) from 2006 to 2012. Based on the overall comparisons, neither changing the chemotherapy sequence nor accelerated fractionation improved treatment outcome. However, secondary analyses demonstrated that when adjusted for RT parameters and other significant factors, the induction-concurrent sequence, especially the induction-PX regimen, achieved significant improvements in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival. Efficacy varied among different RT groups: although no impact was observed in the accelerated-fractionation group and the 3-arm chemotherapy cohort, a comparison of the induction-concurrent versus concurrent-adjuvant sequence in the conventional-fractionation group demonstrated a significant benefit in PFS (78% vs 62% at 5 years; P = .015) and a marginal benefit in overall survival (84% vs 72%; P = .042) after adjusting for multiple comparisons. Comparison of the induction-PX versus the adjuvant-PF regimen demonstrated better PFS (78% vs 62%; P = .027) without an increase in overall late toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: For patients irradiated using conventional fractionation, changing the chemotherapy sequence from a concurrent-adjuvant to an induction-concurrent sequence, particularly using induction cisplatin and capecitabine, potentially could improve efficacy without an adverse impact on late toxicity. However, further validation is needed for confirmation of these findings.
Authors: Pierre Blanchard; Anne W M Lee; Alexandra Carmel; Ng Wai Tong; Jun Ma; Anthony T C Chan; Ruey Long Hong; Ming-Yuan Chen; Lei Chen; Wen-Fei Li; Pei-Yu Huang; Dora L W Kwong; Sharon S X Poh; Roger Ngan; Hai-Qiang Mai; Camille Ollivier; George Fountzilas; Li Zhang; Jean Bourhis; Anne Aupérin; Benjamin Lacas; Jean-Pierre Pignon Journal: Clin Transl Radiat Oncol Date: 2021-11-26
Authors: Zhiyuan Xu; Li Yang; Wai-Tong Ng; Aya El Helali; Victor Ho-Fun Lee; Lingyu Ma; Qin Liu; Jishi Li; Lin Shen; Jijie Huang; Jiandong Zha; Cheng Zhou; Anne W M Lee; Longhua Chen Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2022-04-27 Impact factor: 5.738
Authors: Kenneth C W Wong; Edwin P Hui; Kwok-Wai Lo; Wai Kei Jacky Lam; David Johnson; Lili Li; Qian Tao; Kwan Chee Allen Chan; Ka-Fai To; Ann D King; Brigette B Y Ma; Anthony T C Chan Journal: Nat Rev Clin Oncol Date: 2021-06-30 Impact factor: 66.675
Authors: Tan Tan; Xiangjie Fu; Jiaquan Qu; Miao Zhang; He Chen; Yaochun Wang; Bo Wang; Juan Li; Jie Liu; Peijun Liu Journal: Aging (Albany NY) Date: 2021-09-12 Impact factor: 5.682