Jiani Zheng1,2,3, Jingxun Wu1,2,3, Chunyue Wang1,2,3, Shiwen Zhuang1,2,3, Jianbo Chen1,2,3, Feng Ye1,2,3. 1. First Clinical Medical School, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China. 2. Department of Medical Oncology, Xiamen Cancer Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen, China. 3. Laboratory, Xiamen Cancer Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.
Abstract
PURPOSE: This meta-analysis aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitors plus endocrine therapy (ET) in hormonal receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer (ABC). METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, ClinicalTrials.gov., ASCO, ESMO and AACR databases from inception to October 10, 2019 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared CDK 4/6 inhibitors plus ET to single-agent ET with no treatment-line restriction. The main outcomes analyzed were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), clinical benefit rate (CBR), and adverse events (AEs). RESULTS: Of 938 identified studies, 9 RCTs with 5043 women were eligible and included. Compared with ET alone, CDK 4/6 inhibitors and ET combination improved in PFS (hazard ratio (HR) 0.54, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.50-0.59, p< 0.00001) and OS (HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.69-0.85, p< 0.00001), regardless of ET strategies (HR 0.54, 95% CI 0.50-0.59 in PFS; HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.69-0.85 in OS), treatment line of advanced disease (HR 0.52, 95% CI 0.46-0.59 in PFS; HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.66-0.85 in OS) and menopausal status (HR 0.54, 95% CI 0.50-0.58 in PFS; HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.68-0.84 in OS). Higher risk of grade 3/4 AEs (RR 2.66, 95% CI 2.44-2.90, p < 0.00001) were observed in the combination group than in the ET group. CONCLUSIONS: Combination therapy with CDK 4/6 inhibitors and ET prolongs survival in HR+/ HER2- ABC. This combination is a better therapeutic strategy than endocrine monotherapy in HR+/HER2- ABC, regardless of treatment line, menopausal status and other individual characteristics.
PURPOSE: This meta-analysis aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitors plus endocrine therapy (ET) in hormonal receptor-positive (HR+), humanepidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer (ABC). METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, ClinicalTrials.gov., ASCO, ESMO and AACR databases from inception to October 10, 2019 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared CDK 4/6 inhibitors plus ET to single-agent ET with no treatment-line restriction. The main outcomes analyzed were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), clinical benefit rate (CBR), and adverse events (AEs). RESULTS: Of 938 identified studies, 9 RCTs with 5043 women were eligible and included. Compared with ET alone, CDK 4/6 inhibitors and ET combination improved in PFS (hazard ratio (HR) 0.54, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.50-0.59, p< 0.00001) and OS (HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.69-0.85, p< 0.00001), regardless of ET strategies (HR 0.54, 95% CI 0.50-0.59 in PFS; HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.69-0.85 in OS), treatment line of advanced disease (HR 0.52, 95% CI 0.46-0.59 in PFS; HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.66-0.85 in OS) and menopausal status (HR 0.54, 95% CI 0.50-0.58 in PFS; HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.68-0.84 in OS). Higher risk of grade 3/4 AEs (RR 2.66, 95% CI 2.44-2.90, p < 0.00001) were observed in the combination group than in the ET group. CONCLUSIONS: Combination therapy with CDK 4/6 inhibitors and ET prolongs survival in HR+/ HER2- ABC. This combination is a better therapeutic strategy than endocrine monotherapy in HR+/HER2- ABC, regardless of treatment line, menopausal status and other individual characteristics.
Authors: Kathleen Beusterien; Martine C Maculaitis; Bernadette Hallissey; Michael M Gaschler; Mary Lou Smith; Ernest H Law Journal: Patient Prefer Adherence Date: 2021-03-18 Impact factor: 2.711
Authors: Harold J Burstein; Mark R Somerfield; Debra L Barton; Ali Dorris; Lesley J Fallowfield; Dharamvir Jain; Stephen R D Johnston; Larissa A Korde; Jennifer K Litton; Erin R Macrae; Lindsay L Peterson; Praveen Vikas; Rachel L Yung; Hope S Rugo Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2021-07-29 Impact factor: 44.544