Sophie Y Wang1,2, Oliver Groene1,3. 1. OptiMedis AG, Hamburg, Germany. 2. Hamburg Center for Health Economics, Hamburg, Germany. 3. London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, England, United Kingdom.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Interventions informed by behavioral economics have the potential to change behaviors governed by underlying cognitive biases. This has been explored extensively for various use in healthcare including changing patient behavior and, more recently, physician behavior. We aimed to systematically review the literature on the use and effectiveness of behavioral economics-informed interventions in changing physician behavior. METHOD: We searched Medline, Cochrane Library, EBM Reviews, PsychINFO, EconLit, Business Source Complete and Web of Science for peer-reviewed studies published in English that examined the effectiveness of behavioral economics-informed interventions on physician behavioral change. We included studies of physicians in all care settings and specialties and all types of objectively measured behavioral outcomes. The reporting quality of included studies was appraised using the Effective Public Health Practice Project tool. RESULTS: We screened 6,439 studies and included 17 studies that met our criteria, involving at least 9,834 physicians. The majority of studies were conducted in the United States, published between 2014 and 2018, and were in the patient safety and quality domain. Reporting quality of included studies included strong (n = 7), moderate (n = 6) and weak (n = 4). Changing default settings and providing social reference points were the most widely studied interventions, with these studies consistently demonstrating their effectiveness in changing physician behavior despite differences in implementation methods among studies. Prescribing behavior was most frequently targeted in included studies, with consistent effectiveness of studied interventions. CONCLUSION: Changing default settings and providing social reference points were the most frequently studied and consistently effective interventions in changing physician behavior towards guideline-concordant practices. Additional theory-informed research is needed to better understand the mechanisms underlying the effectiveness of these interventions to guide implementation.
OBJECTIVE: Interventions informed by behavioral economics have the potential to change behaviors governed by underlying cognitive biases. This has been explored extensively for various use in healthcare including changing patient behavior and, more recently, physician behavior. We aimed to systematically review the literature on the use and effectiveness of behavioral economics-informed interventions in changing physician behavior. METHOD: We searched Medline, Cochrane Library, EBM Reviews, PsychINFO, EconLit, Business Source Complete and Web of Science for peer-reviewed studies published in English that examined the effectiveness of behavioral economics-informed interventions on physician behavioral change. We included studies of physicians in all care settings and specialties and all types of objectively measured behavioral outcomes. The reporting quality of included studies was appraised using the Effective Public Health Practice Project tool. RESULTS: We screened 6,439 studies and included 17 studies that met our criteria, involving at least 9,834 physicians. The majority of studies were conducted in the United States, published between 2014 and 2018, and were in the patient safety and quality domain. Reporting quality of included studies included strong (n = 7), moderate (n = 6) and weak (n = 4). Changing default settings and providing social reference points were the most widely studied interventions, with these studies consistently demonstrating their effectiveness in changing physician behavior despite differences in implementation methods among studies. Prescribing behavior was most frequently targeted in included studies, with consistent effectiveness of studied interventions. CONCLUSION: Changing default settings and providing social reference points were the most frequently studied and consistently effective interventions in changing physician behavior towards guideline-concordant practices. Additional theory-informed research is needed to better understand the mechanisms underlying the effectiveness of these interventions to guide implementation.
Authors: Eric J Keller; Kayla Nixon; Lola Oladini; Howard B Chrisman; Angela Chaudhari; Magdy P Milad; Robert L Vogelzang Journal: PLoS One Date: 2022-01-25 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Alast Ahmadi; Andrea Sorensen; Chad Wes A Villaflores; John N Mafi; Sitaram S Vangala; Ira S Hofer; John D Bartlett; Eric M Cheng; Victor F Duval; Cheryl Damberg; David Elashoff; Noah J Goldstein; Joseph A Ladapo; James M Moore; Antonio M Pessegueiro; Suzanne B Shu; Samuel A Skootsky; Ashley Turner; Catherine A Sarkisian Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2021-11-03 Impact factor: 3.006
Authors: Su-Ying Liang; Cheryl D Stults; Veena G Jones; Qiwen Huang; Jeremy Sutton; Guy Tennyson; Albert S Chan Journal: JMIR Hum Factors Date: 2022-03-30
Authors: Kevin L Kraemer; Andrew D Althouse; Melessa Salay; Adam J Gordon; Eric Wright; David Anisman; Gerald Cochran; Gary Fischer; Walid F Gellad; Megan Hamm; Melissa Kern; Ajay D Wasan Journal: JAMA Health Forum Date: 2022-07-29